Share

Local authority three-card trick

Local authority three-card trick
Blogs

Local authority three-card trick 1

Governance | David Davison | 20 Aug 2010

David Davison exposes the costly implications of dabbling with local authorities as they deliver the three-card pensions trick.

We’ve all seen and marvelled at the skill and dexterity of magicians and con-men as they perform myriad variations of the three-card trick. The one common feature is that, no matter how hard we look to follow the queen or the ace, when we pick a card it’s never the one we think and we just have to keep handing over more and more money to the smiling trickster.

Unfortunately many charities and not-for-profit organisations are recognising that some similar sleight of hand has been performed by local authorities when they outsourced many of their services.

In the same way that a con-man might let a mark win a few hands to encourage them to take a final big gamble, many organisations that thought they had “won” a contract don’t see the pay-off coming until it’s much too late.

What numerous organisations failed to spot was that when they took on staff from the local authority, and retained membership for those staff in the local government pension scheme, they took on responsibility not only for pension liabilities for the future service period of those staff but also for all the service built up prior to their transfer.

I’ve seen recently one organisation where 70 to 80 per cent of the pension liabilities allocated to them had built up prior to their establishment. In other cases I’ve seen pension liabilities many times the value of the organisation for exactly the same reason. That’s one way for local authorities to help sort out their pension liabilities, but whilst not exactly a con trick, it’s not particularly fair or reasonable either.

Ownership of these liabilities exposes organisations to considerable additional risk as final salary pension liabilities are by their very nature unknown. Actual returns below those assumed or major changes in staffing numbers can result in a request for the payment of increased contributions out of a fixed budget which will reduce the amount available for front-line services. The termination of a contract can trigger a request for a lump sum payment which is considerably beyond the ability of the organisation to meet with inevitable results.

The terms of any out-sourcing agreement are established at outset as part of the transfer terms document and any pension scheme admission agreement and it is vital that organisations seek independent professional advice over the terms included here if they are not to fall victim to a very expensive three-card trick.

David Davison is a director of Spence & Partners Actuaries and Dalriada Trustees

Carl Allen
none
none
20 Aug 2010

No sleigh of hand occurs in most instances.

It is simply that few not-for-private-profit organisations are industrious enough to do the homework required for such ventures.

Failed to prepare and unprepared for failure.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

David  Davison

David is also director of Dalriada Trustees and Civil Society Media's dedicated pensions blogger.

Martin Farrell (36) Tesse Akpeki (31) Tania Mason (13) Andrew Chaggar (13) Robert Ashton (10) David Philpott (9) John Tate (8) Gordon Hunter (8) Celina Ribeiro (6) Ian Allsop (6) Less +++ More +++

Carrot and stick

21 May 2012

Community isn't led by government, so why wait for it to tell you what to do, protests Robert Ashton....

How to resolve your pensions problem

21 May 2012

How do you solve a problem like a pension deficit? David McHattie tackles the issue.

Pursue pension change together

15 May 2012

David Davison mounts his soapbox to call for pensions reform.

emailalert

Join the discussion

Twitter
 
Training

Attending our one day courses is a highly effective way of ensuring new and existing trustees fully understand their role, responsibilities and liabilities.

>> Find out more <<