Share

A Scottish charity sector take on Budget 2012

Calton Hill, Edinburgh
Blogs

A Scottish charity sector take on Budget 2012

Finance | Ruchir Shah | 26 Mar 2012

Budget 2012 does little to improve equality in the UK, according to Ruchir Shah.

Last Wednesday revealed a very tax neutral Budget. What it gives with one hand it takes with the other. But it is certainly not tax redistribution, as increases for lower and middle income groups appear to come from other lower and middle income groups. It’s not clear if the richest will really be forced to take their share of austerity. In the absence of redistributive tax measures, encouraging philanthropy becomes even more important.

From a Scottish charity perspective, the new 25 per cent cap on income tax reliefs is not good news. It means less tax efficiency which in part motivates wealthier people to give to charities. So much has been made about the impact this will have on philanthropic behaviour, but you can also look at it another way. Unless charity giving is excluded from this cap, the government will effectively be taking a slice of the largest donations to charities for the Treasury.

This will also interplay with another other key announcement on Wednesday, with the news that the Scottish government will back the provisions of the UK government’s Scotland Bill. The impact of the way the new tax powers for Scotland will work with gift aid for charities in Scotland will now need to be reviewed in light of the cap on tax relief for the wealthy. Will Scotland have a say over how the cap interacts with their new tax powers? Will Scotland be even more radical in its approach to stamp duty land tax, which the Chancellor has pushed up for wealthy property buyers, once the Bill comes into force? Will a Scottish approach be different?

Besides the Budget, welfare reform remains the biggest concern for many charities. The Chancellor has strongly suggested that he will be seeking a further £10bn in welfare cuts by 2016. This will hit some of the most vulnerable people and groups hard. Something tells me there will be even more pain in future Budgets once the public nerve has been tested with this. Expect more anti-benefits rhetoric over the course of the year.

Another important issue for the third sector is making the tax system easier to use for people. There has been a lot of rhetoric on simplifying the benefits and tax system. Yet the Budget has been marked by more means testing and increasing complexity for personal tax. Taking the pensioner allowance changes as an example - is the approach to simplification here about making it easier for the tax office or for the tax payer? The varying allowances for different pensioners will undoubtedly create confusion, as will the rules for child benefit tapers and eligibility for benefits that depend on take-home income. Expect calls to charity helplines to increase.

Most intriguingly there was a rumour whispered that the move to regional variation of public sector salaries might in the future be extended to benefits. If this were the case, then the existing support for the devolution of welfare and benefits in Scotland would become even stronger.

There were of course some specific tax measures for charities in the Budget, but most of them had either been announced previously or are simply tweaks to existing tax concessions; a tidying up job. For example, red tape for charity shops and community sports clubs will be streamlined while VAT burdens will be eased for charities sharing costs and those that transport goods for emergency relief.

The small donations scheme is more significant though. It is designed to make it easier for charities fundraising through smaller collections to benefit from a gift aid-like return on donations under £20. However this is not really a tax measure but a funding scheme. Scotland could push for using this new allocation differently in future if the system doesn’t work. For example, could Scotland create a more open funding scheme to support smaller charities and community groups?

Omissions prove interesting

Even more interesting for charities is what they didn’t get. Many of us were expecting significant announcements to improve payroll giving, an introduction of living legacies, and a move to tackle the £1bn subsidy charities give to the government through VAT lost on services. There has been a real missed opportunity here.

I was fascinated to hear an interview with a woman who was set to net gain from the tax proposals but was unhappy because of the net loss that would be suffered by her neighbours. It suggested a real sense of solidarity, something more akin to the real Big Society sentiment that Cameron has found so elusive. This doesn’t fit neatly into the theory of self-interested individualism that now seems to drive the government’s approach to taxation.

This has been a very constrained Budget, but marked by a philosophy which sees the poor and vulnerable as a burden to the economy. From a charity perspective, the UK's position as one of the most unequal countries in Europe seems secure.

Ruchir Shah is policy manager at the Scottish Council of Voluntary Organisations

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Ruchir Shah

Ruchir Shah is head of the policy department at the Scottish Council for Voluntary Organisations. He was also responsible for leading the Civil Society Index for Scotland and was editor of View magazine bringing policy insights from civil society to the big issues facing Scotland.

Tesse Akpeki (54) Martin Farrell (46) Robert Ashton (41) Tania Mason (23) Andrew Chaggar (23) David Ainsworth (15) David Philpott (14) Ian Allsop (12) Vibeka Mair (11) Niki May Young (11)
Celina Ribeiro (10) Gordon Hunter (9) Kirsty Weakley (9) Leon Ward (9) David Davison (8) John Tate (8) Making Good: The Future of the Voluntary Sector (8) Dorothy Dalton (7) Neal Green (5) Jeremy Swain (5) Rowena Lewis (5) Daniel Phelan (4) Andrew Hind CB (3) Suzi Leather (3) Stephen Lloyd (3) Pauline Broomhead (3) Rosie Chapman (3) Ingrid Marson (3) Alexander Swallow (3) Belinda Pratten (3) Sir Stuart Etherington (2) Adrian Beney (2) Joe Saxton (2) Jesper Christensen (2) Paul Gibson (2) Andrew Scadding (2) Anne Moynihan (2) Kevin Carey (2) Garreth Spillane (2) June O'Sullivan (2) Dan Corry (2) Paul Emery (2) Simon Steeden (2) Alice Sharman (2) Lesley-Anne Alexander CBE (1) Victoria Cook (1) Claris D'cruz (1) Peter Gotham (1) Sir Thomas Hughes-Hallett (1) Justin Davis Smith (1) Kate Sayer (1) Alison McKenna (1) Anne-Marie Piper (1) Jo Swinhoe (1) Karl Wilding (1) Richard Williams (1) Mike Hudson (1) Sir Christopher Kelly (1) Daniel Fletcher (1) Martin Brookes (1) Simon Hebditch (1) Lindsay Driscoll (1) Jo Coleman (1) Cedric Frederick (1) Jonathan Lewis (1) Dame Mary Marsh (1) Rosamund McCarthy (1) Jill Pitkeathley (1) Nick Brooks (1) Linda Laurance (1) Suzie Who (1) James Thompson (1) Stephen Hammersley (1) John May (1) Julian Blake (1) Malcolm Hurlston (1) Andy Gregg (1) Anne Owers (1) Beth Yorath (1) Paul Amadi (1) Caroline Beaumont (1) Judith Davey (1) Douglas Rouse (1) Jackie Turpin (1) Jonathan Last (1) Tom Flood (1) Dan Sutch (1) Jonathan Crown (1) Ruchir Shah (1) Katy Wing (1) George Ames (1) Jenny North (1) Sir David Varney (1) Liam Barrington-Bush (1) Mairéad O'Reilly (1) Tobin Aldrich (1) Michael O'Toole (1) Lisa Clavering (1) Ian Joseph (1) Jonathan Bruck (1) Rachel Short (1) Dr Debra Beck (1) Andy Rich (1) Ian Leggett (1) Leigh Daynes (1) Tim Willis (1) Richard Caulfield (1) Emma Callagher (1)
Less +++ More +++

Learning from history

3 Oct 2014

With the emergence of the cloud, the number of accounting software options is growing fast – just as...

Brooks Newmark: a knit wit?

2 Oct 2014

Ian Allsop returned from holiday to find many in the sector already needled by Brooks Newmark. This article...

It’s not the minister who counts

1 Oct 2014

Writing for Charity Finance magazine, which went to press before Brooks Newmark resigned as minister for...

Free eNews

Join the discussion

Twitter
 
Training

Attending our one day courses is a highly effective way of ensuring new and existing trustees fully understand their role, responsibilities and liabilities.

>> Find out more <<