Share

What’s all the fuss about the Forestry Commission?

Green burials could bring extra revenue
Blogs

What’s all the fuss about the Forestry Commission?2

Governance | Gordon Hunter | 2 Feb 2011

Gordon Hunter thinks the plans to sell off forests are 'pedestrian' and could go further.

The Forestry Commission is the largest government landowner in England with 620,000 acres of woods and heathland. The previous government agreed to shed 6.5 per cent of the estate. The latest consultation proposes offloading 13 per cent of the remainder.

The rationale is sensible: reduce the Commission’s operational deficit of £75m a year and revert to its regulatory role.

The process sounds reasonable: invite bids from businesses and charities for 150-year leases, attaching conditions and covenants to protect habitats and access.

The Opposition seems to be reflexive rather than reflective, almost saying: “If the government’s selling off green assets, it must be wrong whatever the safeguards”, or, “it’s privatisation as part of a political philosophy”.

I would argue that the Commission’s plans are pedestrian rather than political.  

There should be more focus on entrepreneurs, less on subsidies to charitable stewards and a creative rather than a protectionist approach.

What about?..

All buyers (commercial or otherwise) should contribute to a local community grant pot.

Lessees should submit business plans that demonstrate self-sustainability within ten years, otherwise the lease reverts to the local community. 

The Commission should encourage a range of business applications, for example “green burials” where 2,000 acres spread over the UK would reduce carbon footprint and maintenance costs whilst contributing £45m a year to grant making.

Green burial is precisely the sort of practical “product” that could fund Big Society at the local level. 

 

 

David Fitzpatrick
Chief Executive
Hertfordshire Community Foundation
3 Feb 2011

I am intrigued by the information coming out about this particular policy. Published yesterday (2 Feb 2011), some commentators are suggesting that it will cost more to sell of the government's wooded estate than it will bring in. If this be true, and if this had an economic basis for being suggested, who should now be fired?? If this had an environmental basis, will it make any improvement in the status quo? If neither and thus it is merely ideological, surely this must come out into the open and be properly debated?

Hannah Bourne
Consultant
Hannah Bourne Communications
2 Feb 2011

It's great to see someone thinking creatively about the FC sell-off. You may be interested in views of woodlands.co.uk who think private owners have a bigger part to play in the sell-off. You can see more here http://www.woodlands.co.uk/reports.php

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Gordon Hunter

Gordon Hunter is director of the Lincolnshire Community Foundation, which he started in 2002, and blogs for Civil Society on all things 'local'.  He has a background in HR and an ambition to expel all thoughtless jargon.

Tesse Akpeki (55) Martin Farrell (46) Robert Ashton (41) Tania Mason (23) Andrew Chaggar (23) David Ainsworth (16) David Philpott (14) Making Good: The Future of the Voluntary Sector (13) Ian Allsop (12) Vibeka Mair (11)
Niki May Young (11) Celina Ribeiro (10) Gordon Hunter (9) Kirsty Weakley (9) Leon Ward (9) David Davison (8) Dorothy Dalton (8) John Tate (8) Neal Green (5) Jeremy Swain (5) Rowena Lewis (5) Daniel Phelan (4) Andrew Hind CB (3) Suzi Leather (3) Stephen Lloyd (3) Pauline Broomhead (3) Rosie Chapman (3) Ingrid Marson (3) Alexander Swallow (3) Belinda Pratten (3) Sir Stuart Etherington (2) Adrian Beney (2) Joe Saxton (2) Jesper Christensen (2) Paul Gibson (2) Andrew Scadding (2) Anne Moynihan (2) Kevin Carey (2) Garreth Spillane (2) June O'Sullivan (2) Dan Corry (2) Paul Emery (2) Simon Steeden (2) Alice Sharman (2) Lesley-Anne Alexander CBE (1) Victoria Cook (1) Claris D'cruz (1) Peter Gotham (1) Sir Thomas Hughes-Hallett (1) Justin Davis Smith (1) Kate Sayer (1) Alison McKenna (1) Anne-Marie Piper (1) Jo Swinhoe (1) Karl Wilding (1) Richard Williams (1) Mike Hudson (1) Sir Christopher Kelly (1) Martin Brookes (1) Simon Hebditch (1) Lindsay Driscoll (1) Jo Coleman (1) Cedric Frederick (1) Jonathan Lewis (1) Dame Mary Marsh (1) Rosamund McCarthy (1) Jill Pitkeathley (1) Nick Brooks (1) Linda Laurance (1) Suzie Who (1) James Thompson (1) Stephen Hammersley (1) John May (1) Julian Blake (1) Malcolm Hurlston (1) Andy Gregg (1) Anne Owers (1) Beth Yorath (1) Paul Amadi (1) Caroline Beaumont (1) Judith Davey (1) Douglas Rouse (1) Jackie Turpin (1) Jonathan Last (1) Tom Flood (1) Dan Sutch (1) Jonathan Crown (1) Ruchir Shah (1) Katy Wing (1) George Ames (1) Jenny North (1) Sir David Varney (1) Liam Barrington-Bush (1) Mairéad O'Reilly (1) Tobin Aldrich (1) Michael O'Toole (1) Lisa Clavering (1) Ian Joseph (1) Jonathan Bruck (1) Rachel Short (1) Dr Debra Beck (1) Andy Rich (1) Ian Leggett (1) Leigh Daynes (1) Tim Willis (1) Richard Caulfield (1) Emma Callagher (1)
Less +++ More +++

Defending the right

7 Nov 2014

Ian Allsop calls for a charity to be set up to campaign on behalf of oppressed right-wing politicians.

Fiery rocket or damp squib?

4 Nov 2014

As bonfire night approaches, John Tate is cautious about the pace of the new developments setting the...

The social investment arguments are not black and white

3 Nov 2014

Social finance is not wrong for the voluntary sector - but we must learn lessons from history, says Ashley...

Free eNews

Join the discussion

Twitter
 
Training

Attending our one day courses is a highly effective way of ensuring new and existing trustees fully understand their role, responsibilities and liabilities.

>> Find out more <<