Share

Voluntary sector leaders must fight homelessness together

Voluntary sector leaders must fight homelessness together
Blogs

Voluntary sector leaders must fight homelessness together 2

Governance | Tania Mason | 9 Nov 2010

Tania Mason warns the achievements in tackling homelessness in the 80s could unravel if the charity sector does not rally together.

Senior voluntary sector figures who worked on the frontline to influence government policy on homelessness in the 1980s speak with pride about the successes they had and with respect about their opposite numbers in government who implemented the policies that they campaigned for.

Gerald Oppenheim, for instance, who until recently was head of policy at BIG, recalls how even when the Greater London Council (where he was a grants officer) was locked in battle with the government over its abolition, both sides put aside their differences to implement new measures to get people off the streets. The government gave the GLC powers to make grants to organisations like Shelter and Centrepoint, and Oppenheim says this programme was one of the only things the two sides were able to talk to each other about without taking positions.

“They were stirring times,” he recalls. “That was real partnership working.”

Julia Unwin, now CEO of the Joseph Rowntree Foundation has similar memories of her tenure as director of Homeless Link from 1986 to1992, when she led a campaign to badger the government to tackle the growing problem of street homelessness in London.

Out of this came the Rough Sleepers Initiative: new funding that went directly to voluntary groups, the opening of new hostels, and the expansion of private sector leasing.

When I interviewed Julia after she won the Outstanding Leadership Award at this year’s Charity Awards she told me that the achievements of Homeless Link and other groups were not short-lived, that getting people off the streets remains a central government policy to this day.

Unfortunately, this may not be the case for much longer. Navca chief executive Kevin Curley used his closing speech at the Navca conference this week to warn that: “The government in recent times has made it more likely that people will become homeless.”

The lethal cocktail of public spending cuts, new caps on housing benefits and the un-ring-fencing of grants for the provision of local housing advice will put thousands more people at risk of homelessness, Curley said.

He advised local support groups to “put this issue in your in-tray”.

It’s a salutary warning and Curley is right to highlight the issue. A big increase in levels of homelessness would reverberate throughout the entire sector. As Curley said: “How can a local voluntary organisation provide training to a young person with a drug problem, if he is moving from bedsit to shared room, sleeping on the floors of friends? How can a local organisation do effective rehabilitation work with an offender in his late 20s – fresh out of prison – if he is threatened with homelessness?”

Two decades ago, a significant pool of our sector’s brightest talent mustered their energies and skills and applied effective pressure to the powers-that-be to tackle the very problem that now threatens to blight society again. The good work that was done then and has endured pretty well to this day must not be allowed to unravel. Maybe a co-ordinated effort by the sector’s next wave of outstanding leaders is required to stop the scourge of widespread homelessness seeping back in.

Tania Mason is group editor at Civil Society Media

Carole Jones
Service Director
CAN
16 Nov 2010

The issue isn't in respect of frontline agencies taking their foot off the pedal, the voluntary sector will always work with dedication and compassion to do all that it can for people in need of our services.

But this creditable work is at risk because local authorities will cut funding to the voluntary sector services providing outreach to rough sleepers and housing option /homelessness prevention advice, using the money to fund its own in-house services.

The voluntary sector isn't very good at showcasing the positive impact of services on peoples lives, and there is a real need to collaborate for the sake of the vulnerable and disadvantaged who are in danger of being overlooked and ignored should frontline voluntary sector housing service disappear.

Jeremy Swain
Chief Exectutive
Thames Reach
16 Nov 2010

Tania - I was a bit bewildered by your piece. It suggests that not much collaborative work is going on amongst homelessness organisations at present. This is far from being the case.

In London the drive to end rough sleeping by the end of 2012 is being overseen by the Mayor's Delivery Board. Chaired by the Mayor's Director of Housing, this group includes senior representatives from NHS London the key central London local authorities, probation service, DWP, Ministry of Justice, Department for Communities and Local Government, Metropolitan Police and homelessness charities - Thames Reach, Crisis, Homeless Link, Broadway and St Mungo's.

The reason why the numbers of rough sleepers in London is around an eighth of the number in New York is because we have never taken our foot off of the pedal. Numbers are creeping up, but we have a new initiative in place called No Second Night Out to address this. This issue has not - nor ever will - leave my in-tray!

Thanks.

Jeremy Swain

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Tania Mason

Tania Mason is group editor at Civil Society Media. She has been a journalist for 20-odd years and has specialised in the charity sector since 2003.

Follow Tania on Twitter @taniamason

Martin Farrell (36) Tesse Akpeki (31) Tania Mason (13) Andrew Chaggar (13) Robert Ashton (10) David Philpott (9) John Tate (8) Gordon Hunter (8) Celina Ribeiro (6) Ian Allsop (6) Less +++ More +++

Carrot and stick

21 May 2012

Community isn't led by government, so why wait for it to tell you what to do, protests Robert Ashton....

How to resolve your pensions problem

21 May 2012

How do you solve a problem like a pension deficit? David McHattie tackles the issue.

Pursue pension change together

15 May 2012

David Davison mounts his soapbox to call for pensions reform.

emailalert

Join the discussion

Twitter
 
Training

Attending our one day courses is a highly effective way of ensuring new and existing trustees fully understand their role, responsibilities and liabilities.

>> Find out more <<