Share

The advantages of a hung parliament

The advantages of a hung parliament
Blogs

The advantages of a hung parliament

Governance | Garreth Spillane | 10 May 2010

A hung parliament may not necessarily spell disaster for the sector, says Garreth Spillane. Just look at New Zealand.

What a week! The election has produced a hung parliament and  no coalition deal as yet. Some commentators and industry leaders are warning of the potential calamitous outcomes of this situation. In the mainstream and sector press, contributors have been clambering over one another to paint the picture of dysfunction.

A lot of these pundits are going to be disappointed. Whatever you think of the voting system and wherever you sit on the political spectrum, it is highly likely that we will see a better policy environment as a result of this inconclusive election result.

Being a New Zealander and having worked in the Civil Service there, I have a fairly good understanding of far-flung outpost of Westminster democracy. Since the 1996 election, the first under the MMP voting system, no party has enjoyed an outright majority, leading to coalition negotiations commencing as results are announced. Each parliament under this system has resulted in a different coalition composition, with each of these parliaments having a different dynamic in terms of the legislative programme; the second term of the Fifth Labour Government (2002-2005) was significantly focussed on social legislation.

I read a great quote from Professor Jonathan Boston, Director of the Institute of Policy Studies at Victoria University (Wellington, New Zealand), who said of the MMP (Mixed Member Proportional) voting system and the coalitions that result:

“The new [MMP] system has generated a better policy process, a more representative parliament and probably better policy outcomes.”

The three major UK parliamentary parties are fairly centrist on most key issues and therefore enjoy a commonality that is not as prevalent in many European countries where coalition politics tends to play out at the extremes of the political spectrum.  These policies and the parties’ ability to negotiate them will be the basis of the longevity of the next Government.

As the talks continue at Westminster, my hope is that we as charities can make a greater impact on the public policy process.  Coalition politics will change the way policy is formed – more voices will be heard in developing legislation that is agreeable to coalition partners, and this presents an opportunity for all of us to contribute to our democracy.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Tags

Martin Farrell (36) Tesse Akpeki (31) Tania Mason (13) Andrew Chaggar (13) Robert Ashton (10) David Philpott (9) John Tate (8) Gordon Hunter (8) Celina Ribeiro (6) Ian Allsop (6) Less +++ More +++

Carrot and stick

21 May 2012

Community isn't led by government, so why wait for it to tell you what to do, protests Robert Ashton....

How to resolve your pensions problem

21 May 2012

How do you solve a problem like a pension deficit? David McHattie tackles the issue.

Pursue pension change together

15 May 2012

David Davison mounts his soapbox to call for pensions reform.

emailalert

Join the discussion

Twitter
 
Training

Attending our one day courses is a highly effective way of ensuring new and existing trustees fully understand their role, responsibilities and liabilities.

>> Find out more <<