Share

Project Prevention or Project Eugenics - the campaign to sterilise addicts

Project Prevention or Project Eugenics - the campaign to sterilise addicts
Blogs

Project Prevention or Project Eugenics - the campaign to sterilise addicts

Governance | Suzie Who | 30 Apr 2010

Surely one of the most controversial stories of the month is the opening of a helpline for UK drug addicts by US based charity ‘Project Prevention’?

This charity offers cash incentives to female drug addicts who undergo sterilisation in order to prevent them bearing children they will not care for.

The charity themselves admit that the money it pays addicts will normally go to paying for more drugs – but claims that this is an efficient way of protecting the rights of the unborn children. Those rights, it claims, over-ride those of the addicts.

This is wrong in so many ways I hardly know where to begin; How can it be acceptable to write off all addicts as lost causes and take away their chances of ever having a family? How can charitable money be used to fund the purchase of drugs? How can incentivising desperate people - whose only thought at that point in time is how to get their next fix – to take actions of such significance be responsible?

Surely there is also a fundamental flaw in the rationale that the charity founders state underpins their actions - how can you base your rationale on the rights of a unborn child when the only help you offer that child is not to be born at all?

At one time in my career I worked in a charity helping adults with learning disabilities. I remember receiving a large donation from a supporter who gave this money on the condition that we used it to sterilise adults with Down’s Syndrome to prevent them having children they could not care for. Although the donor was well meaning, there was no way the charity would entertain the idea of accepting the money for this purpose and we entered into a candid conversation with the donor about why such action would never be something we would consider. Happily in this instance the donor did reconsider his view and allow the donation to be used for work to champion the rights of young adults with Down’s Syndrome.

I am not just shocked but also saddened that a charity with objectives and programmes such as those of Project Prevention can be allowed to operate even a phoneline within the UK. I am even more saddened that this organisation will be welcoming donations from UK residents. Drug addiction and children’s rights are emotive topics and as a sector we need to ensure that we educate the public about what kinds of responses are appropriate.

Sterilisation in my opinion is not a suitable response to drug addiction, any more than it is to learning disability. Project Prevention will just muddy the waters and allow greater confusion in the minds of donors. It could also draw vitally needed funding away from charities who are doing such valuable work helping addicts and their families deal with their addiction and make positive changes in their lives.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Tags

Martin Farrell (36) Tesse Akpeki (31) Tania Mason (13) Andrew Chaggar (13) Robert Ashton (10) David Philpott (9) John Tate (8) Gordon Hunter (8) Celina Ribeiro (6) Ian Allsop (6) Less +++ More +++

Carrot and stick

21 May 2012

Community isn't led by government, so why wait for it to tell you what to do, protests Robert Ashton....

How to resolve your pensions problem

21 May 2012

How do you solve a problem like a pension deficit? David McHattie tackles the issue.

Pursue pension change together

15 May 2012

David Davison mounts his soapbox to call for pensions reform.

emailalert

Join the discussion

Twitter
 
Training

Attending our one day courses is a highly effective way of ensuring new and existing trustees fully understand their role, responsibilities and liabilities.

>> Find out more <<