Share

Face-to-face: the next act

Face-to-face: the next act
Blogs

Face-to-face: the next act1

Fundraising | Tania Mason | 29 Aug 2012

Roll up, roll up, for the next act of the fascinating spectacle that is face-to-face fundraising. By Tania Mason.

Face-to-face fundraising walks a tightrope; it always has and it probably always will.  As the PFRA’s new CEO, Sally de la Bedoyere, aptly puts it: it has to balance the rights of charities to ask for support with the rights of individuals not to feel unduly pressured into giving away their hard-earned money.

It’s still a relatively young fundraising technique, and it’s had to fight to get a seat at the table – even within the sector itself. Under the leadership of Mick Aldridge, the PFRA built a reputation as something of a pitbull – as one insider said recently, “he only had one mode and that was attack”. But that’s because that was what was needed at the time – the crusade against chugging by the right-wing media had taken hold and the lily-livered fundraising charities, despite cashing in by the bucketload on the street, always found something else to do whenever the Daily Mail or Telegraph journalists came a-calling.  It was left to Mick and his team to try to defend the technique – a situation that was a source of constant frustration for him.

But now there is a glimmer of hope that things might be changing. Since the infamous Newsnight debacle
of a couple of years ago, the PFRA has been working hard to convince its members that they do need to step up to the plate when chugging is challenged, and Sally de la Bedoyere is confident that in future, they will. As a former managing director of the Evening Standard, she understands intimately how the media works and that the portrayal of street fundraising is driven by the personal likes and dislikes of editors rather than any dispassionate analysis of the facts.  But crucially, she also understands that while the PFRA can work its socks off managing site agreements, improving compliance and generally driving up standards, all of that won’t be nearly as effective as the director of fundraising at a household-name cancer charity standing up on Newsnight and explaining from the heart that that annoying chugger outside Victoria Station has just helped to save the life of six-year-old leukaemia patient Rosie from Ealing.

Sally de la Bedoyere has plenty of relevant experience, clearly relishes a challenge and doesn’t seem the type to suffer fools. She also has a mature, intelligent approach to chuggers: “I’ve never donated to one but I’ve had plenty of conversations with them. Some days I have the time to stop and ask them about their charity, others days I’m too busy and so I smile and say no thanks and walk past.  And I think that’s what the public should do too.”

She’s a shrewd operator and after just three weeks in the job she can talk about the often-complex issues as if she’s been there three years. She confidently compartmentalises the challenges raised by Lord Hodgson in his report and has plans in place to address each of them. And she refuses to engage in any public jostling for position with the other fundraising umbrella bodies, while also firmly declaring that she only expects the PFRA’s role to grow.

For avid spectators of this particular tightrope act, it just got even more interesting.

Adrian Salmon
29 Aug 2012

Good luck to Sally and her team. They've got a tough job ahead of them, and it's only getting worse. As far as I can see they have the following major issues to overcome:

1) Preventing (or, more accurately, trying to reverse) a tragedy of the commons. There are only so many viable sites for street fundraising, and many charities who want to make use of them. So the monitoring of street fundraisers' conduct in these high-visibility places is crucial.

2) Personalised dislike of the fundraisers themselves. You can't read comments on articles about street fundraising in the press, without the words 'grinning dreadlocked youth', or similar, coming up somewhere in the first half dozen. People don't like the fundraisers first and foremost, it would seem, a) because they're young, b) because they're generally cheerful and c) because they seem to portray a counter culture in their style of dress that still offends social conservatives. See also the criticism directed at the Occupy London protesters, for much the same reason.

3) Accusations of 'parasitism'. Many commenters call street fundraisers 'parasites' and even go so far as to deny that their job has any validity whatsoever in British life. Verbal and physical abuse of them is condoned by many. Basically it would seem people don't like fundraising to have any whiff of professionalism about it at all - by and large we the public seem to prefer fundraising only to be done by well-meaning amateurs, even if this is much less effective.

So, fundraising charities could be much more open and honest about costs. A £70 cost to acquire a donor on the street still compares very favourably to the costs of acquiring donors by mail, but you can't expect the general public to understand this. Any charity that is paying a fee per donor to a street fundraising agency will have to be able to show how this is still a more effective use of their money than asking a volunteer to stand out there with a collecting tin.

Maybe there needs to be a campaign against the verbal and physical harassment of these, mostly young, people in the same way that railway companies and the NHS have had to run campaigns to protect their own staff?

But in the end, I've sadly come to the conclusion that I don't think public attitudes are going to change substantially in the short-term, unless a dramatic and visible change occurs in the way street fundraising campaigns are run. Even if this makes them temporarily, and maybe drastically, less effective.

Unfortunately the British public as a whole doesn't give two hoots about charities raising money effectively, they just don't want to have their preconceptions challenged.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Tania Mason

Tania Mason is group editor at Civil Society Media. She has been a journalist for 20-odd years and has specialised in the charity sector since 2003.

Follow Tania on Twitter @taniamason

Martin Farrell (43) Tesse Akpeki (40) Robert Ashton (26) Andrew Chaggar (21) Tania Mason (18) Ian Allsop (12) David Philpott (12) Celina Ribeiro (9) Niki May Young (9) David Davison (8)
John Tate (8) Gordon Hunter (8) Vibeka Mair (7) Neal Green (5) Dorothy Dalton (5) Jeremy Swain (5) Rowena Lewis (5) Kirsty Weakley (5) Gareth Jones (4) Daniel Phelan (4) Andrew Hind CB (3) Suzi Leather (3) Ingrid Marson (3) Alexander Swallow (3) Belinda Pratten (3) Sir Stuart Etherington (2) Stephen Lloyd (2) Adrian Beney (2) Jesper Christensen (2) Paul Gibson (2) Andrew Scadding (2) Anne Moynihan (2) Kevin Carey (2) Shirley Otto (2) Garreth Spillane (2) Rosie Chapman (2) June O'Sullivan (2) Paul Emery (2) Lesley-Anne Alexander CBE (1) Victoria Cook (1) Claris D'cruz (1) Peter Gotham (1) Sir Thomas Hughes-Hallett (1) Justin Davis Smith (1) Kate Sayer (1) Sally Kirby (1) Anne-Marie Piper (1) Peter Scott (1) Jo Swinhoe (1) Karl Wilding (1) Richard Williams (1) Joe Saxton (1) Pauline Broomhead (1) Mike Hudson (1) Sir Christopher Kelly (1) Daniel Fletcher (1) Martin Brookes (1) Simon Hebditch (1) Lindsay Driscoll (1) Jo Coleman (1) Cedric Frederick (1) Jonathan Lewis (1) Dame Mary Marsh (1) Rosamund McCarthy (1) Jill Pitkeathley (1) Hal Broadbent (1) Linda Laurance (1) Nadine Nohr (1) Suzie Who (1) Rob Dyson (1) James Thompson (1) Stephen Hammersley (1) John May (1) Julian Blake (1) Malcolm Hurlston (1) Anne Owers (1) Beth Yorath (1) Paul Amadi (1) Caroline Beaumont (1) Judith Davey (1) Dan Corry (1) Douglas Rouse (1) Jackie Turpin (1) Jonathan Last (1) Tom Flood (1) Dan Sutch (1) Jonathan Crown (1) Ruchir Shah (1) Katy Wing (1) George Ames (1) Sir David Varney (1) Liam Barrington-Bush (1) Mairéad O'Reilly (1) Lisa Clavering (1) Ian Joseph (1) Jonathan Bruck (1) Rachel Short (1)
Less +++ More +++

Pointless ministers?

9 May 2013

Ian Allsop muses on the unattractive political career prospects of a charities minister.

Tablets: the end of an era?

9 May 2013

John Tate asks whether the inexorable rise of the tablet will spell the end for the humble PC.

What charities should know about zero-hour contracts

8 May 2013

In straitened times, finding ways to cut staff costs can be all too tempting. But while zero-hour contracts...

Free eNews

Join the discussion

Twitter
 
Training

Attending our one day courses is a highly effective way of ensuring new and existing trustees fully understand their role, responsibilities and liabilities.

>> Find out more <<