Care: The good, the bad and the ugly

Care: The good, the bad and the ugly

Care: The good, the bad and the ugly

Governance | George Ames | 6 Jul 2012

George Ames is sick of care getting a bad name. It's time charities and other service providers worked together to show the public the full picture.

The word 'care' has some very ugly connotations. The strong link to illness, death, disability and vulnerability and the idea of losing control and independence makes it an emotive subject. The recent coverage around the BBC season ‘When I’m 65’ has led to dramatic headlines like: “I'd rather take my own life than face illness in old age”. Even with the inclusion of more upbeat stories like the positive ageing programme for Radio 4, the vast majority of the media discussion around care and old age paints a bleak picture.

This isn’t just a recent phenomenon either, if you take a look at the last six months' coverage revolving around scandal, failures, underfunding, lack of dignity and unnecessary death. Even this week after the BBC coverage has died down; the papers have reminded us of the fragility of the financial situation – questioning how on earth Great Britain PLC can foot the growing care bill.

While no-one can deny there are serious issues to be discussed and tough questions to be answered, I don’t think the media is reflecting the full story of care in the UK today. Where are the good narratives? Care is a catch-all term covering an array of support services to help people live lives they want to for as long as possible. Care homes, in-home care, respite services for exhausted family and carers… through to dog walking, helping with the gardening, good neighbourliness and being engaged with the community in which you live. They are all forms of care and all contribute to better lives for people who use them.

The question organisations working in this area must be asking themselves is how do we redress this balance in the public eye, to give a more rounded view of care?

There is a real need to reframe the issue so care is not seen as a life sentence. A wider variety of voices must be heard including providers, carers and the end users themselves. Confusion and fear must be addressed by highlighting the opportunities to prepare for a better end of life. Fostering better understanding of the financial responsibilities involved, what solution works best for the individual’s needs and what assistance is available in their local community.

There are too many invisible parties within the care debate. This is a huge issue that is going to affect all of us directly or indirectly in the very near future, so it is vital to engage everyone in this debate now to ensure better care for all – now and in the future.

Driving awareness to the positive aspects of care and fostering a broader discussion is essential, if we are going to get to grips with this issue. Service providers and charities working in this area must find a way to show that the issue of care isn’t something to hide from, it’s something to find out as much as possible about before a crisis hits and people are forced into making decisions under stress. This will only happen if organisations act now to create better communication and engagement on care.

The debate must reflect the good, as well as the bad and the ugly.  

George Ames is a director at Forster Communications



[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear


  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

George Ames is a director at communications agency Forster. His clients include Age UK, Nokia and the Department of Health.

Tesse Akpeki (55) Martin Farrell (46) Robert Ashton (41) Tania Mason (23) Andrew Chaggar (23) David Ainsworth (16) David Philpott (14) Making Good: The Future of the Voluntary Sector (13) Ian Allsop (12) Vibeka Mair (11)
Niki May Young (11) Celina Ribeiro (10) Dorothy Dalton (9) Gordon Hunter (9) Kirsty Weakley (9) Leon Ward (9) David Davison (8) John Tate (8) Neal Green (5) Jeremy Swain (5) Rowena Lewis (5) Daniel Phelan (4) Andrew Hind CB (3) Suzi Leather (3) Stephen Lloyd (3) Pauline Broomhead (3) Rosie Chapman (3) Ingrid Marson (3) Alexander Swallow (3) Belinda Pratten (3) Alice Sharman (3) Sir Stuart Etherington (2) Adrian Beney (2) Joe Saxton (2) Jesper Christensen (2) Paul Gibson (2) Andrew Scadding (2) Anne Moynihan (2) Kevin Carey (2) Garreth Spillane (2) June O'Sullivan (2) Dan Corry (2) Paul Emery (2) Simon Steeden (2) Lesley-Anne Alexander CBE (1) Victoria Cook (1) Claris D'cruz (1) Peter Gotham (1) Sir Thomas Hughes-Hallett (1) Justin Davis Smith (1) Kate Sayer (1) Alison McKenna (1) Anne-Marie Piper (1) Jo Swinhoe (1) Karl Wilding (1) Richard Williams (1) Mike Hudson (1) Sir Christopher Kelly (1) Martin Brookes (1) Simon Hebditch (1) Lindsay Driscoll (1) Jo Coleman (1) Cedric Frederick (1) Jonathan Lewis (1) Dame Mary Marsh (1) Rosamund McCarthy (1) Jill Pitkeathley (1) Nick Brooks (1) Linda Laurance (1) Suzie Who (1) James Thompson (1) Stephen Hammersley (1) John May (1) Julian Blake (1) Malcolm Hurlston (1) Andy Gregg (1) Anne Owers (1) Beth Yorath (1) Paul Amadi (1) Caroline Beaumont (1) Judith Davey (1) Douglas Rouse (1) Jackie Turpin (1) Jonathan Last (1) Tom Flood (1) Dan Sutch (1) Jonathan Crown (1) Ruchir Shah (1) Katy Wing (1) George Ames (1) Jenny North (1) Sir David Varney (1) Liam Barrington-Bush (1) Mairéad O'Reilly (1) Tobin Aldrich (1) Michael O'Toole (1) Lisa Clavering (1) Ian Joseph (1) Jonathan Bruck (1) Rachel Short (1) Dr Debra Beck (1) Andy Rich (1) Ian Leggett (1) Leigh Daynes (1) Tim Willis (1) Richard Caulfield (1) Emma Callagher (1)
Less +++ More +++

A chance to get your voice heard – ‘speak up or pay up’

6 Jan 2015

David Davison urges charities that participate in local government pension schemes to respond to the Department...

Regulation rules

3 Dec 2014

NCVO and Acevo are both reviewing the Charity Commission, but there’s no suggestion of one-upmanship,...

Asserting our real value

2 Dec 2014

The sector is selling itself short in allowing money to dominate everything we do, believes Kathy Evans.

Free eNews

Join the discussion


Attending our one day courses is a highly effective way of ensuring new and existing trustees fully understand their role, responsibilities and liabilities.

>> Find out more <<