Share

Preparing your charity for Olympic disruption

Preparing your charity for Olympic disruption
Blogs

Preparing your charity for Olympic disruption 1

Governance | 3 Jan 2012

Employers should prepare for disruption as well as the benefits of hosting the London Olympics in 2012, says lawyer Allison Grant.

With just a few months to go until the opening ceremony of the London 2012 Olympic Games, many businesses are looking forward to the new opportunities and prospect of increased revenue they have been assured the games will bring. However, it appears that many employers are failing to prepare for what is anticipated to be a largely disrupted summer for many businesses and their workforce.

With an expected 5.5 million visitors to the capital in the summer of 2012, and thousands of visitors anticipated to visit the other Olympic sites across Britain, many businesses and the government alike are excited about the prospects of new business opportunities and ‘escaping’ the recession, which is still casting a large shadow over the British economy.

However, it has emerged that many employers are failing to prepare for the impact the games will have on their workforce, the infrastructure and needs of their business. The games will be, for most people, a once in a lifetime event and understandably a large proportion of the UK’s workforce will want to watch the Olympic events. Employers should consider whether they need to put in place arrangements to deal with the increase in demand for time off, and the difficulties some employees, clients and suppliers may have in travelling to and from businesses.

Travel disruption

Employers may see an increase in requests to work remotely or flexibly during the period of the games – to enable them to watch coverage or perhaps, to avoid the potential travel disruption. Many employers will be wondering how to address this issue and whether they have to consider permitting flexible working during this unusual period.

The position on flexible working will largely come down to the employer’s own policy. In terms of legislation, there is only a duty on employers to consider requests for flexible working, where the request is made in connection with providing care for dependant adults or children. There is no such duty on employers to provide or consider flexible working for employees to attend ‘one off’ sporting events such as the Olympics, or World Cup for example.

However, ACAS has recently published guidance for employers who are struggling to decide how to deal with the difficulties that the Olympics will bring with regard to staffing levels and the provision of flexible working. The guide suggests that, where possible, employers should be flexible, for example permitting employees to work from home, alter their hours/break times or allowing employees access to a television during breaks.

With best intentions aside, where employees take unauthorised leave this may result in employers taking disciplinary action against them. Employers should also consider data protection, security and confidentiality aspects of allowing employees to work from home.

Although there are many types of work and roles where working from home or flexible working is simply not practical, for those where it is, there is an argument that in allowing flexibility, employers might boost morale amongst employees during this unusual time and perhaps increase productivity in the long run.

In addition, the ACAS guidance suggests that employers should communicate clearly with employees on how they are going to manage periods of leave and realistically set out what can and cannot be accommodated throughout the games. ACAS also specifies that all requests for time off throughout the period of the games should be dealt with fairly.

Think about suppliers and clients

Charities will have to bear in mind the additional logistical problems the games may impose, not only for staff, but suppliers and clients alike. Transport may cause problems particularly for those employers based in and around London (or other Olympic venues), and it is suggested that employers should perhaps make allowances for employees commuting to/from the most affected areas.

The games will quickly be upon us, however, in the meantime employers should use the remaining time running up to the games to ensure that they are properly prepared for the logistical difficulties that the games may pose, to ensure their businesses are as unaffected as possible. In doing so, it will mean employers are best prepared to take advantage of the many new business opportunities that the games may present.

Allison Grant is partner at Lester Aldridge LLP

 

Ben Wittenberg
DSC
9 Jan 2012

Of course the main disruption charities will be experiencing due to the Olympics is the absence of £425million of funding that would have been distributed to them by BIG if it hadn't been stolen by the government to pay for the games. www.biglotteryrefund.org.uk #biglotteryrefund

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Martin Farrell (36) Tesse Akpeki (31) Tania Mason (13) Andrew Chaggar (13) Robert Ashton (10) David Philpott (9) John Tate (8) Gordon Hunter (8) Celina Ribeiro (6) Ian Allsop (6) Less +++ More +++

Carrot and stick

21 May 2012

Community isn't led by government, so why wait for it to tell you what to do, protests Robert Ashton....

How to resolve your pensions problem

21 May 2012

How do you solve a problem like a pension deficit? David McHattie tackles the issue.

Pursue pension change together

15 May 2012

David Davison mounts his soapbox to call for pensions reform.

emailalert

Join the discussion

Twitter
 
Training

Attending our one day courses is a highly effective way of ensuring new and existing trustees fully understand their role, responsibilities and liabilities.

>> Find out more <<