Share

The best performing companies are those who take governance seriously

The best performing companies are those who take governance seriously
Blogs

The best performing companies are those who take governance seriously

Governance | Tesse Akpeki | 12 Sep 2011

Tesse Akpeki highlights a new report which links good governance and a healthy gender balance to better performance and profits on corporate boards.

The value of good leadership is without question and needs to be assessed over a period of years. Often the question is asked about the impact of good governance on the performance of an organisation and the evidence that investing in governance makes a difference. 

A new report by Opus Executive Partners, a specialist advisory and executive search firm examined the financial and governance performance of 130 AIM listed oil and gas companies in the sector between 2006 and 2011.

The study links corporate governance to performance.  The comparator against the UK Corporate Code study was with the company’s financial performance. Demonstrated is a positive link between corporate governance performance and compliance with the June 2010 UK Corporate Governance Code.

Companies with better corporate governance produced a better return for shareholders. While the overall compliance with corporate governance requirements was poor, interestingly ten companies that topped the corporate governance tables had an average governance score of  90 per cent and delivered a growth in shareholder value of 49 per cent -  above-average shareholder returns.  Companies that performed poorly in the governance tables had a financial performance well below average. The bottom ten companies had an average corporate governance score of only 13 per cent and decreased share value by 55 per cent.

Other findings were that how a company structures itself to address those challenges can help to reduce risks.  Board composition also matters.  In poorly performing organisations, the representation of women at board level was virtually non-existent. Despite most of the companies studied stating their commitment to good governance, there was uncertainty as to what these standards actually are.  

The bottom line? Strengthening governance allows for changes in the board and gauging the team’s effectiveness. 

The welcome news?  Good governance can help to mitigate risk and deliver better shareholder value.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Tesse Akpeki

Tesse Akpeki is a lawyer, chartered secretary, coach, facilitator and accredited Centre for Effective Dispute Resolution mediator.

Follow Tesse on Twitter @tesseakpeki

Martin Farrell (36) Tesse Akpeki (31) Tania Mason (13) Andrew Chaggar (13) Robert Ashton (10) David Philpott (9) John Tate (8) Gordon Hunter (8) Celina Ribeiro (6) Ian Allsop (6) Less +++ More +++

Carrot and stick

21 May 2012

Community isn't led by government, so why wait for it to tell you what to do, protests Robert Ashton....

How to resolve your pensions problem

21 May 2012

How do you solve a problem like a pension deficit? David McHattie tackles the issue.

Pursue pension change together

15 May 2012

David Davison mounts his soapbox to call for pensions reform.

emailalert

Join the discussion

Twitter
 
Training

Attending our one day courses is a highly effective way of ensuring new and existing trustees fully understand their role, responsibilities and liabilities.

>> Find out more <<