Share

Facebook Connect brings the world of Facebook to your website

Facebook Connect brings the world of Facebook to your website
Opinion

Facebook Connect brings the world of Facebook to your website 8

While Facebook can be a great way of helping charities engage with their supporters, one of the accusations typically thrown at it (and rightly so) is that it’s a walled garden and not very open with its data. You can include lots of information, like your personal details, photos and videos, but it’s usually very hard to get data back out.

One thing that Facebook has introduced to help open up its data is its Open Stream API. This is a way of pulling all the information out of a Facebook news feed or wall and manipulating or displaying it somewhere else in any way you want. You’ll need a good Facebook developer and a decent amount of time to build anything from that, but there is a slightly easier way of connecting your website with Facebook (if not back the other way).  It’s called, cunningly, Facebook Connect.

The basic premise is that, when on a website, a user can login to Facebook and share their activities  on that site with their Facebook network. So you might be leaving a comment on a blog, and by connecting with Facebook you can share that comment with your network – so they can read it and follow the link to that blog if they are interested. What’s more, the privacy settings set up in Facebook are used in Connect, so people will only share what they’ve previously allowed Facebook to share.

On a deeper level, that could be allowing people to login to a site using their Facebook details instead of creating a new account. But let’s not get too complicated to start with.

The reason I think this is important to charities is that it’s the first time you can get someone’s personal details out of Facebook and use them somewhere else. Thanks to Ross, I found a list of Facebook Connect implementations on the social media blog Mashable which will give you some great examples.

One implementation I thought was particularly good was Frenzied Waters, which uses  your details from Facebook to make a quite unsettling video of what would happen if you were attacked by a shark (to promote the Discovery Channel’s Shark Week). Try it out, by clicking on the 'my story' floating jar and see how it makes you feel. Scary, huh.

Also great was the Prototype Experience, a campaign to promote a computer game that pulls in your details from Facebook (photos, name, etc.) to create a hugely personal experience. In my case, the experience was more than a little surreal, as it pulled in photos from a fancy dress party I’d shared on Facebook, but hopefully you get the general idea.

But it’s this personalisation that’s the point I want to make. We all know from DM experience that the more personal a campaign, the better the response rate. And for many people, data doesn’t get much more personal than what they share with their friends on Facebook…

Imagine how you could use that data in a campaign. How could you use someone’s personal photos and make it relevant to your charity’s goals or a story for a new campaign?  Or, once someone is donating to you online, could you ask them to connect with Facebook so you could create a personalised thank-you video, including their name and address, showing how their donation has helped?

There is great scope for using this feature to create a rich, interactive experience and greater personalisation. The beauty is that you don’t have to ask people to enter any details, they just log in to Facebook, and you use things they’ve already shared.

The one charity I have seen using Facebook Connect so far is Amnesty UK, who use it on Protect the Human. Read their explanation to see how it’s being used, and for the more technically minded among you, here are the developer notes which explain the whole thing in more detail.

Anon
24 Aug 2009

I work for a very small charity that now has a national partnership for 2010 as a result of drumming up support soley on Facebook. 3 months agao our organisation has 2 facebook friends and now we have over 400 including celebrities. From Facebook we have been given free national advertising, free venues and gained over 100 volunteer community fundraisers. We are now going to be putting on an event in 2010 as a result of our facebook succsess. How can free communication with over 18% of the population not be worth the time investment? We are set to bring in over £20,000 this qtr as a result of online networking.

 

Hannah Jewkes
20 Aug 2009

I think you draw some very odd conclusions here! The point of the Frenzied Waters and Prototype campaigns is to scare people. Watching turbulant a shark attack on it's own isn't scary to our desensitized youth - but seeing our own data being flashed before our eyes is terrifying in our paranoid culture.


What we, as fundraisers, are doing when we personalise our communications, is to tell them that we remember who they are and care about them as an individual - but this can be done just by using their name, not by showing their own photos!


I think what Amnesty is doing is cool - it seems to be more about using people's Facebook connections to reach out to them and share what ways they are involved in Amnesty and what they care about, not about using their data.

 

Jonathan Waddingham
20 Aug 2009

Hi Hannah,

I have to disagree with you on the point of both those campaigns being just to scare people - in the case of the shark attack it was scary, yes, but only to make you think about it. But there wasn't anything scary about the Prototype experience. It was just involving you in the story, so the game revolved around *you*, instead of some generic made-up name. I agree with you on the Amnesty front - there are different degrees of integration you can use FB Connect for, and in the fairly light way they have implemented it, it's a great way to help spread the word and more people should use it.

Having said that, I'm sure that fundraisers can think of more interesting ways to use the data than just bring in the name, and not necessarily go as far as pulling in someone's photos - that will certainly put some people off. There's a lot of data in Facebook, and surely the more personalised, relevant we can be, the more effective our communications will become.

Jonathan Waddingham
18 Aug 2009

Hi Reb, Thanks for the comment, it formed the basis for my subsequent post where I wanted to find out if people share your view of Facebook. Read more here

 

Reb
14 Aug 2009

As donors cannot actually donate to a charity via Facebook, this just sounds like a waste of time for the charity itself in an era where resources are stretched.

John Carnell
13 Aug 2009

Privacy is a minor issue as a user has to create a trusted connection between their Facebook identity and the external site. The user will already be aware of what this means and knows they can revoke that access at any time via their Facebook settings. External sites also only have limited access to certain types of data and can only send a limited amount of stuff into a users account. So far most Facebook connect features on external sites are limited to messaging (wall post push) and pulling in pictures. The pictures element is an issue that FB need to address as usually photos are marked for friends only via the FB connect it seems the apps can pull those anyway as a trusted connection is assumed for those as well. (could at last code push) John

Jonathan Waddingham
12 Aug 2009

The privacy concerns are good ones - no one wants to be seen to be using data that they shouldn't. Maybe I wasn't clear enough above, but this feature would use the privacy settings someone has already set in Facebook, so it *should* cover that usage elsewhere and the user *should* be aware of that. Of course, whether the Facebook users have understood the nuances of its privacy settings, and how they can be used by services such as FB Connect, is another question...

 

Anonymous
12 Aug 2009

I'm very conflicted by this. On one hand, I think charities have a duty to their beneficiaries to take up every opportunity to make money from donors.

However, for me, this is a grey area of data protection. If charities are seen to pounce on private information - even if those individuals haven't actually protected that information - then it could do damage to trust in the organisation.

 

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Carrot and stick

21 May 2012

Community isn't led by government, so why wait for it to tell you what to do, protests Robert Ashton....

Timeline: Coalition government so far

14 May 2012

It’s two years since Britain voted in the previously unlikely coalition of the Conservatives and Liberal...

Where for art thou major donors?

14 May 2012

Philip Spedding invokes an anecdote about the Tate to lambast the government's proposed cap on tax relief...

Accelerating insurance change for volunteer drivers

25 May 2012

Dan Sumners outlines Volunteering England's efforts to turn insurance red tape into a green light for...

Carrot and stick

21 May 2012

Community isn't led by government, so why wait for it to tell you what to do, protests Robert Ashton....

How to resolve your pensions problem

21 May 2012

How do you solve a problem like a pension deficit? David McHattie tackles the issue.

Subscribe to Fundraising magazine
emailalert

Join the discussion

Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn