Why do people hate charities so much?

Why do people hate charities so much?

Why do people hate charities so much?

Fundraising | Reuben Turner | 1 Mar 2007

Why do people hate charities so much, asks Reuben Turner and Simon Frank.

You’re wonderful people, you lot. You work tirelessly to cure cancer, save the environment, end poverty… between you, you probably save the lives of thousands of people every day. Kids are eating. Puppies are being saved from canals. You get the picture.

In fact, we’d go so far as to say the collective readership of this magazine is a greater force for good than Mother Theresa and Santa Claus put together. Why then, does the British public appear to detest you so wholeheartedly? Why do they cross the road to avoid your chuggers?

Why do they open their newspapers over the bin to avoid even seeing your inserts? Why do they write angry letters to the Daily Mail because you’ve popped a perfectly nice leaflet through their door?

After all, people don’t react in the same way to commercial brands. There is the odd exception (Dasani – Coke’s tapwater in a bottle – caused such a backlash it was taken off the shelves). But generally, commercial organisations have been allowed to get away with the worst excesses of marketing imaginable (in fact, both of us have been responsible for some of them).

There is a difference, though. Even the worst advert for an international drinks company attempts to exhibit a modicum of wit, charm and intelligence. It tries to persuade people into buying its product, not bludgeon them. It doesn’t try and make them feel guilty for not consuming its fizzy, tartrazine-rich beverages. In fact, it tries to make them feel good for the positive act of purchase.

Most of all, it tries to be new and different. Because commercial organisations – successful ones, anyway – hold innovation in the highest esteem. New products, and new variations on old products, are being developed all the time. 

Take soap powder – you can now buy powder, liquid, tablets and even liquitabs from most manufacturers, in every size, shape, price and format imaginable. And all they do is wash clothes.

Forget the products for a moment, and think how many techniques have been employed to sell washing powder. Persil is now encouraging people to get dirty – an idea that would have been totally inconceivable 10 years ago. But the story’s the same. It’s just dirty clothes —clean clothes. 

How many interesting stories do we have? How many millions of lives do our organisations touch? How many different, new innovative ways of doing what we do, do we develop all the time?

So why does our creative all look and sound, basically, the same?

Take chuggers, for example. Hundreds of people will walk past them for every one who stops to chat. Of those few that stop, how many will be talked into signing up for a direct debit? And of those, how many stay long enough to justify the cost of recruiting them?

For every person who profitably signs up in this way, thousands of others have been exposed to your brand – in an almost entirely negative way. They haven’t just seen your logo. They’ve actually crossed the road to avoid it.

The reason most people walk past is that they’ve heard it all before. They know the drill. They know there will be a few shocking facts and pictures, then a well-crafted sales argument that will lead towards the setting up of a direct debit. They know they will be made to feel bad if they say ‘no’.

The causes vary enormously, but the methods don’t change one iota. It’s yesterday’s chugger in a different tabard. Often literally.

This isn’t an attack on chuggers. It’s an analogy. Think of them as just another recruitment medium – inserts or doordrops composed of flesh and blood, if you will.

As an industry, our creative is based on formula. We see what someone else has done, then we try to copy it. Because ‘it works’. No other industry thinks this way. Persil wouldn’t use the same approach as Ariel but would invest in innovation – product, marketing or both. They’d try to get one step ahead – either by using a slightly different, slightly better approach; or a radically different one.

Perhaps you should give it a try. Perhaps you’ll make a few more friends. After all, you deserve to.

Reuben Turner and Simon Frank are the creative directors at Cascaid


[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear


  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

The long and unhappy saga of the Local Sustainability Fund

29 Jun 2015

Last week the government announced a £20m pot of funding for charities. This sounds like good news, says...

'Frugging' undermines genuine research and harms the sector

10 Jun 2015

Is frugging the new chugging? Jane Frost rails against the practice of fundraising under the guise of...

Six tips on how to get your funding proposals noticed

9 Jun 2015

Struggling to get your funding proposal approved? Pauline Carnet unearths six tips on how to make your...

The long and unhappy saga of the Local Sustainability Fund

29 Jun 2015

Last week the government announced a £20m pot of funding for charities. This sounds like good news, says...

Government can't ask charities to compete for contracts while savaging council spending

15 Jun 2015

The government cannot tell charities they must compete for contracts in a market while slashing the spending...

'Northern Powerhouse'? Almost as clearly defined as the big society

4 Jun 2015

Ian Allsop talks tomatoes and why charities should look north for income growth opportunities under the...

Subscribe to Fundraising magazine
eNews sign-up

Join the discussion

Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn