Share

Philanthropy Review fails to acknowledge role of fundraising, says IoF

Louise Richards, director of policy and campaigns at the Institute of Fundraising
News

Philanthropy Review fails to acknowledge role of fundraising, says IoF

Fundraising | Gareth Jones | 22 Jun 2011

Organisations have queued up to point out areas that the Philanthropy Review has not addressed, with the Institute of Fundraising leading the way.

In a press statement, the Institute said the Review “fails to reference the central role of fundraising in generating income for charities”.

It said that while the Review makes recommendations on how giving should be simplified and encouraged, it “lacks practical detail on how the roles of fundraisers can help to affect this change”.

Louise Richards, director of policy and campaigns at the Institute, added: “Without considered and careful investment in professional fundraising techniques, supported by the necessary joined up thinking from government, charities will never benefit fully from the effects of the culture of encouraging philanthropy in the UK.”

The Institute did however say that it agrees on the need for more evidence-based research in the sector, and supports the call for the government to increase the cap on reclaiming gift aid on small cash donations from £5,000 to £50,000.

Broad range of altruism

Meanwhile, Henny Braund, chief executive of the stem cell donation charity Anthony Nolan, welcomed the report but said it did not take a broad enough view of altruism.

“There is something missing from the forms of altruism addressed by both the government and the Philanthropy Review. The hole in the plan is that giving is perceived in only terms of time and money.

“Good causes need a broad range of altruistic activity to succeed.  For Anthony Nolan, people willing to donate blood stem cells are imperative to the successful achievement of our goal to find a matching donor for every blood cancer patient who need a stem cell transplant.”

Elsewhere, Polly Gowers, CEO of Everyclick, argued that technology and innovation have been bypassed by the report.

“This Philanthropy Review report is great and the initiatives outlined, such as increasing education in schools and simplifying payroll giving, are great steps in the right direction.

“But I feel it bypasses social entrepreneurship and technological factors that could make a world of difference. For example, online shopping provides an opportunity to create new revenue streams for charities.”

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Free eNews

Man admits stealing £300,000 from collections for Help for Heroes

29 Jul 2014

A man has admitted pocketing £300,000 donated by members of the public who believed it would go to Help...

Up to 144 jobs could go at Royal Voluntary Service as part of restructure

29 Jul 2014

Royal Voluntary Service is planning to make up to 144 redundancies in both its operations and support...

Children's charities call for an end to 'price-driven competition' in public service provision

28 Jul 2014

A coalition of 29 children’s charities and trade unions including Barnardo's and Action for Children...

Commission investigates charity over concerns it was used for private benefit

29 Jul 2014

The Charity Commission has opened a statutory inquiry into grant-giver the Catalyst Trust over concerns...

PTA-UK: Big Society Network chief was confident of funding

28 Jul 2014

PTA-UK has revealed that it turned down an invitation from Big Society Network to be a partner in its...

Big Society Network chair’s company gave £64k to Conservative Party

28 Jul 2014

A company owned by the chair of Big Society Network donated services totalling more than £54,000 to the...

Online donations forms are too long and cost charities donations, finds report

28 Jul 2014

One third of leading charity websites require potential donors to complete more than 20 actions before...

Greenpeace video removed from YouTube following copyright claim

14 Jul 2014

A campaign video by Greenpeace against Lego’s relationship with Shell has been subject to a copyright...

Oxfam advert removed after appearing before extremist videos

10 Jul 2014

Oxfam has removed one of its adverts from YouTube after it was shown on channels showing content from...

Join the discussion

Twitter button

@CSFundraising