Britons deterred from international aid by fear of how donations are spent 1

Fundraising | Celina Ribeiro | 16 Jun 2011

Brits are being put off donating to international humanitarian charities by concerns about how their money is spent, according to a survey released today.

A third of people in Britain told a YouGov poll that they do not give to humanitarian charities in the course of a year, placing Britain below France, Belgium and Germany where a slightly larger portion of the population gives to such causes.

The majority of Britons said that they were deterred from donating because they were unsure of how their money would be spent by the charities they gave to. A third said they would be inclined to give more if they had a personal connection to the foreign event or disaster, and 20 per cent said they would be motivated to donate if they had visited a country which was the beneficiary of a humanitarian fundraising campaign.

While one in five Londoners gives more than £50 a year to humanitarian causes, this figure falls when the whole country is calculated, to one in seven.

When asked which of the recent international humanitarian disasters were most deserving of aid, the Haiti earthquake (pictured) topped the list, closely followed by the Japanese tsunami disaster, which 40 per cent of respondents said was deserving of aid.

Nicholas Rutherford, event director at AidEx, which commissioned the research, described the results as “worrying yet unsurprising”.

“There has always been a certain level of scepticism around the delivery of aid following humanitarian crises, but this has not often been directly linked to actual donations, or indeed lack of them.”

The research will be presented at the AidEx conference today.

Image copyright Peta de Aztlan.

Place a comment

Stephen Pidgeon
Partner
Pidgeon Sargeant
16 Jun 2011

This is a classic case of research proving the bloomin' obvious. Ask someone 'Are you concerned that gifts to emergencies don't always end up there?' you'll get a massive affirmative. Does such information have any relevance whatsoever to emergency fundraising? No, not at all. I don't know why they bother.

[Reply]

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Name *

Email *

Organisation

Job Title

Comments *

Verification *

* Please read our Community Standards

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

Robust but respectful debate
Strongly held opinions
Intelligent relevant discussion
The sharing of relevant experiences
New participants

We will not publish:

Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
The posting of contact details for yourself or others
Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.