Share

Ultra rich would give more with better information and tax breaks

Ultra rich would give more with better information and tax breaks
News

Ultra rich would give more with better information and tax breaks 3

Fundraising | Celina Ribeiro | 20 May 2011

Just 7 per cent of the ultra rich are happy with how much they give to charity, but many would be encouraged to give more with better tax incentives or better information about how their donations are spent, a new survey has found.

Of the ultra high net worth individuals surveyed by JP Morgan Private Bank, three quarters said they gave regularly and a further 21 per cent gave on occasion – but even including these, personal satisfaction with the amount they gave was low among these would-be philanthropists. Half of all donors said they gave at least 5 per cent of their net wealth away.

Somewhat predictably, most of those replying to the survey, the results of which were released yesterday, said they would be prompted to give more if they found they were “passionate about the cause”. But many respondents revealed a more strategic, self-interested side; 44 per cent would give more if they became more wealthy and 30 per cent would be inspired to dig deeper if the tax incentives were improved.

Information and evaluation about the impact of both their specific donation and the work of the charity in general were ranked highly for their ability to encourage the wealthy to give more, with 30 per cent responding that more information about the impact of their gift would inspire them to up their donation and a further 14 per cent saying that having a better understanding about the charity’s impact would be an incentive.

One third of those surveyed by the private bank said that they were motivated to give to their existing beneficiary charities as a result of its effectiveness.

Peer groups evidently hold a significant sway with this group of capable donor, with 29 per cent saying that they made a donation as a result of being asked to by a friend or business associate. The most popular motivations cited, however, were personal connection and passion for the cause.

JP Morgan head of EMEA philanthropy Rebecca Eastmond described the way in which her bank advises philanthropic clients. “Anyone who wants to use the money, energy and time they have set aside for philanthropy effectively, will want to make those resources work as hard as possible.  We would always advise that you agree clear benchmarks that will help you and your delivery partner measure what success will look like. Include both quantitative and qualitative measure and ensure that the quantitative and qualitative measures don’t simply measure activity – for example, the number of vaccines administered – but also measure success – for example, the percentage reduction in illnesses contracted,” she said.

“But remember, evaluation is a tool to help you refine and adapt your grant making. It’s not an end in itself."

The survey was completed by 78 of JP Morgan's 200 ultra high net worth clients, who combined have a net wealth of £6bn.

Ed
31 May 2011

I find it amazing that otherwise intelligent people take this rubbish at face value.

'Tax breaks' and 'needing more information' is just the Ultra Rich equivalent of normal people's objections to 'chugging' and 'admin costs' - examples in a long line of excuses created (often subconsciously) to avoid charitable giving without feeling guilty.

The rich have never given as much of their wealth to charity because they prefer to spend it on themselves - it really is that simple.

If you want to get more money from individuals - rich or poor - the only thing to do is get better at asking and ignore the findings of these tedious surveys.

Adrian
Partner
Iain More Associates
25 May 2011

Tax "breaks" don't make money for the donor. They simply mean the donor is "less worse off" than they would otherwise have been as a result of making their gift. But they still have to part with "after-tax" money they could otherwise have spent on themselves.

So even with 50% relief, it still costs a donor £500,000 to give away £1 million to a charity. Sure, tax reliefs make it cheaper to give away money, but the tax relief always, ultimately goes to the charity not the donor.

Yes, tax relief does mean that rich people can divert their tax pounds away from the Treasury and into their favorite cause. But that's no different from the £2.50 Gift Aid which is claimed on a gift of £10 given to the local hospice or whatever.

Either we have a system of reliefs on charitable giving or we don't. If we think we should, then we need to live with the fact that it's handing some of the control over what would otherwise be Treasury receipts to the charities we all support.

There is a philosophical argument to say that if we abolished Gift Aid, Payroll Giving etc etc then we could all pay less tax and the Treasury would have more money to put into health, social care, overseas aid, education etc etc. This is the argument used by some people who will not sign Gift Aid declarations.

But I don't think that anyone from a mainstream charity is going to be arguing for this soon.

So the answer to Ben's question, if we assume that any tax relief on giving is desirable, is that so long as the donor is not claiming more tax relief than they have actually paid (and no-one can do this) then it remains philanthropy all the way.

Ben Wittenberg
DSC
24 May 2011

How big does a tax break need to be before it stops being philanthropy and becomes the state (i.e. everybody) funding a narrow spectrum of interests held by an even narrower spectrum of donors?

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

emailalert

Gift Aid Small Donations Scheme 'too complex to have real impact'

25 May 2012

The Gift Aid Small Donations Scheme is welcome, but will only be effective if it is made less complex...

Tribunal upholds Commission's merger decision but orders changes

24 May 2012

The Charity Tribunal has upheld the Charity Commission’s decision to allow two independent schools in...

Tender is issued for £200m National Citizen Service contracts

24 May 2012

The Department for Education has issued an invitation to tender for delivery of the National Citizen Service...

Tribunal upholds Commission's merger decision but orders changes

24 May 2012

The Charity Tribunal has upheld the Charity Commission’s decision to allow two independent schools in...

BIS consultation on volunteer-led events criticised

24 May 2012

A consultation launched by the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills has been criticised for...

Missing People plans to use Twitter to find child runaways

24 May 2012

Missing People is hoping to track down missing children using Twitter.

Charities in Twitter storm over balloon releases

24 May 2012

Charities are being urged to abandon balloon releases in a Twitter a campaign.

Missing People plans to use Twitter to find child runaways

24 May 2012

Missing People is hoping to track down missing children using Twitter.

Marie Curie opens national support centre and adds 140 staff

21 May 2012

Marie Curie Cancer Care has officially opened its new national support centre in Pontypool, Wales, creating...

Join the discussion

Twitter button

@CSFundraising