Charities highlight financial risk of Work Programme to MPs
9 Feb 2012
Baroness Stedman-Scott, chief executive of Tomorrow’s People, has said her charity, which is sub-contracted on...
The Scottish SPCA has accused the RSPCA of breaching Institute of Fundraising guidelines and launched a campaign alleging that the latter charity is “stealing” from Scottish animals in need.
A £100,000 web and newspaper advertising campaign has been launched by the SSPCA using the slogan ‘The RSPCA won’t save me’ and claiming that while the RSPCA wants Scottish donors’ money, it is unable to help any animals north of the border.
According to research referred to by the SSPCA, 70 per cent of Scots believe the RSPCA works with animals in Scotland.
SSPCA chief executive Stuart Earley said the RSPCA “intentionally” added to public confusion over its mission in order to increase its income.
“The RSPCA is in breach of the Institute of Fundraising guidelines it helped draw up which require charities to be explicitly clear about where they work. Occasionally using small print to tell the Scottish public it is registered in England and Wales is in no way explicit,” he said.
“It is impossible to quantify how much we have lost to the RSPCA but any loss is damaging because we receive no government or lottery funding and rely on public support.”
The Scottish charity has called on the RSPCA to be clearer in its advertising, particularly when it cannot be restricted to England and Wales.
“We did not want to have to campaign in this way and very much hope this brings about a change in RSPCA policy,” Earley added.
The RSPCA was not commenting on the campaign, but in a statement said that it was “extremely surprised” by the attack in light of the close working relationship the two organisations have on a “range of issues”.
The charity also said that it “makes every effort to exclude advertising messages reaching Scottish consumers” and redirects Scottish donors to the Scottish SPCA when they make contact.
“The RSPCA does not deliberately advertise in Scotland and goes to great lengths to ensure wherever possible that our adverts are not distributed outside of England and Wales,” it said.
Donors, suggested the RSPCA, may not respond well to the negative tone of the SSPCA’s campaign.
“The British public, whether in Scotland, England, Wales or Northern Ireland expects charities to collaborate and co-operate, and during these difficult economic times people will not look kindly on charities spending time, money and effort attacking each other.
“We want people in Scotland to support the Scottish SPCA, so the RSPCA will be doing whatever we can to resolve this dispute.”
The Institute of Fundraising has written to both organisations to facilitate a meeting in order to reach an understanding and promote positive messages.
A spokeswoman said that it was in the interests of both charities to resolve the issue. It has refused to comment on the issue of whether the RPSCA was in violation of Institute guidelines for fear it could prejudice the proposed meetings.
Simon Fearn
4 Feb 2009
The animals will be the losers in this spat. Why not amalgamate the two charities and by so doing save a heap of dosh and avoid the need for this squabble?
Helen
4 Feb 2009
I do hope that this squabble doesn't cost too much - the poor animals have enough problems with being dumped left right and centre and being hideously treated by callous owners
Ken Hughes
4 Feb 2009
The two charities should merge and register separately in Scotland and England. This campaign is a waste of money donated to help animals.
Chris Newman
4 Feb 2009
This is not a new issue, it is has been known for years the RSPCA have been deliberately targeting Scotland for funds in order to feed its addiction to Animal Rights campaigning. The RSPCA squander millions, perhaps as much as £30 million annually on its political animal rights agenda.
I sincerely hope the public revelations will see funds going to the right organisation, the SSPCA is a highly respected organisation that deserves public funding to do its sterling work for animal welfare. Sadly, today the same cannot be said of the RSPCA which places Animal Rights above that of Animal Welfare.
As far as I am aware Animal Rights is not a charitable aim, so perhaps one solution would be to remove the charitable status of the RSPCA thus resolving confusion!
Geoff
Executive Director
Aid 4 Africa
4 Feb 2009
How very sad that two such well established charities should be at each others throats. In fact it's really a case of the SPCA being at the RSPCA's throat.
Competition in the charity world is long overdue - BUT criticism of one charity by another should be carried on in private. SHAME ON YOU SPCA. If I was the director of the RSPCA I'd simply register in Scotland and then lets see who "wins". The only losers here are the unfortunate dumb animals.
9 Feb 2012
Baroness Stedman-Scott, chief executive of Tomorrow’s People, has said her charity, which is sub-contracted on...
9 Feb 2012
Professional tax adviser David Perrin has been sentenced to 18-months imprisonment for trying to defraud...
9 Feb 2012
Employment minister Chris Grayling has said that he expects charities to be active in the delivery of...
9 Feb 2012
A new headquarters and hub for social enterprise support organisations has officially opened in London...
8 Feb 2012
Christian Aid has “disestablished” its head of fundraising role as part of a new approach to fundraising...
8 Feb 2012
The key to securing better outcomes for older people and other vulnerable groups is joined-up services,...
9 Feb 2012
The Wellcome Trust plans to give its employees more choice over the type of device they use for work.
6 Feb 2012
An East Sussex-based animal welfare charity has launched a new website in a bid to increase online donations...
31 Jan 2012
4Children has launched its new website to provide clearer information about its work and campaigns as...
Carl Allen
9 Feb 2009
Both hold water but a lake is not a loch.
[Reply]