Share

Two children's charities under fire from Charity Commission

Two children's charities under fire from Charity Commission
News

Two children's charities under fire from Charity Commission

Fundraising | Celina Ribeiro | 26 Feb 2009

The Charity Commission has released damning results of investigations into two so-called children’s welfare charities prompted by public complaints regarding their governance and behaviour.

A report published this week reveals that the Commission found a complete lack of charitable expenditure by the Children’s Welfare Foundation during their investigation, which began in January last year after complaints by various trading standards departments and members of the public about unauthorised and unlicensed clothing collections.

Inquiries discovered that the ‘charity’ hired a clothing collection company called Fortune which failed to comply with fundraising guidelines when requesting donations, and the Children’s Welfare Foundation, which received £600 from Fortune each month regardless of how may clothes were donated, failed to take any professional advice before entering the agreement or monitoring its progress.

The Commission also reports that trustees never produced accounts to the Commission and were unable to account for payments to themselves which they claimed had been for ‘expenses’. The regulator also reported that the trustees had been uncooperative during the investigation into their charity’s activities and accounts.

The foundation was removed from the charities register in October 2008 and given the Commission says its only recourse now is to monitor any activity taken out in the future on behalf of the defunct organisation.

Andrew Hind, chief executive of the Commission, said that members of the public “should notify their local police or trading standards” if they receive any material claiming to come from the Children’s Welfare Foundation.

World Children’s Fund


This latest report follows a separate inquiry into the World Children’s Fund, prompted by ongoing complaints about the emotive tone of its literature.

The investigation was re-opened last year after the charity failed to improve its fundraising materials and because of concerns over the fund’s relationship to a Swiss charity, the World Children’s Fund Europe, to which the UK-based fund was required to send money to without any control over how it is spent.

The Commission, which judged the charity’s messages as “emotive” and to contain either misleading or false statements, has now referred the case to the Advertising Standards Authority which is investigating.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

emailalert

Gift Aid Small Donations Scheme 'too complex to have real impact'

25 May 2012

The Gift Aid Small Donations Scheme is welcome, but will only be effective if it is made less complex...

Tribunal upholds Commission's merger decision but orders changes

24 May 2012

The Charity Tribunal has upheld the Charity Commission’s decision to allow two independent schools in...

Tender is issued for £200m National Citizen Service contracts

24 May 2012

The Department for Education has issued an invitation to tender for delivery of the National Citizen Service...

Tribunal upholds Commission's merger decision but orders changes

24 May 2012

The Charity Tribunal has upheld the Charity Commission’s decision to allow two independent schools in...

BIS consultation on volunteer-led events criticised

24 May 2012

A consultation launched by the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills has been criticised for...

Missing People plans to use Twitter to find child runaways

24 May 2012

Missing People is hoping to track down missing children using Twitter.

Charities in Twitter storm over balloon releases

24 May 2012

Charities are being urged to abandon balloon releases in a Twitter a campaign.

Missing People plans to use Twitter to find child runaways

24 May 2012

Missing People is hoping to track down missing children using Twitter.

Marie Curie opens national support centre and adds 140 staff

21 May 2012

Marie Curie Cancer Care has officially opened its new national support centre in Pontypool, Wales, creating...

Join the discussion

Twitter button

@CSFundraising