Boost for RSPCA as it wins latest legacy appeal

Fundraising | Gareth Jones | 21 Dec 2010

The RSPCA has won its appeal over the legacy of George Mason, and will receive more than two-thirds of the £1m will.

The court found in favour of the RSPCA’s interpretation that Mason wished to leave just £300,000 to his brother John and two friends, Norman and Patricia, the maximum that could at the time be left while remaining exempt from inheritance tax.

The charity argued that it should receive the rest, worth £651,820, whereas Mason’s friends and family had argued they should receive his house on top of the £300,000, leaving the charity with just £370,153.

The decision is a welcome boost for the charity, which late last month lost its appeal over another legacy, a £2m farm left by university lecturer Dr Christine Gill.

Unanimous decision

The Court of Appeal unanimously found in favour of the charity. Lord Justice Patten said: “The will does not disclose a misunderstanding of inheritance tax nor does it permit the clause to be construed as [the barrister for the friends and brother] contends.”

It also found that the judge was wrong to penalise the charity on costs.

Paul Hewitt of Withers LLP, who represented the charity, said: "We believe it is clear that he wanted to benefit his friends, his brother and the charity and avoid anyone paying inheritance tax. His friends and brother still receive legacies totalling £300,000.”

He added: “"The RSPCA tried to resolve this matter including repeated offers of face-to-face meetings but these offers were refused.”

RSPCA chief executive Mark Watts said: “The RSPCA will continue to respect the wishes of its benefactors. It will not lightly surrender legacies left in good faith and in the belief that the funds will be used to combat cruelty to animals.

“We remain extremely grateful to Mr Mason for his generosity in remembering our work for animals which has continued since 1824.”

Directory: Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (RSPCA)
Who's Who: Mark Watts

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Name *

Email *

Organisation

Job Title

Comments *

Verification *

* Please read our Community Standards

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

Robust but respectful debate
Strongly held opinions
Intelligent relevant discussion
The sharing of relevant experiences
New participants

We will not publish:

Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
The posting of contact details for yourself or others
Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.