Share

Compromise agreed on revised F2F code

Compromise agreed on revised F2F code
News

Compromise agreed on revised F2F code

Fundraising | 29 Oct 2008

The Public Fundraising Regulatory Association appears to have reached a compromise with the Institute of Fundraising on whether the new face-to-face code should contain a recommendation for practitioners to join the PFRA.

When the Institute published its first revision of the code in May, it had removed the stipulation that any of its members that carry out face-to-face fundraising “ought to” be members of the PFRA as well.

The PFRA was unhappy about this, and expressed its opposition in its response to the consultation and in meetings with the Institute.

Final recommendation changed slightly

Now the final code has been published with the recommendation reinstated, but slightly altered. It states that face-to-face operators “ought” to consult the PFRA before embarking on any kind of face-to-face activity, and “should” consider joining it in order to signal publicly that they are committed to best practice.

The PFRA issued a statement saying it “warmly welcomed” the new Face-to-Face Activity Code, which also covers prospecting as well as traditional street and door-to-door fundraising.

Parting shot across bows to Institute

But, in what could be interpreted as a parting shot across the bows to the IoF over the matter, the self-regulatory body made clear that it had garnered strong support from both the Association of Town Centre Management (ATCM) and the Charity Commission on the subject.

The ATCM is planning to publish new guidance shortly that will advise its members that they should engage with the PFRA on street fundraising, and the Commission’s forthcoming review of its Charities and Fundraising guidance is likely to emphasise that practitioners should join their relevant self-regulatory bodies.

Megan Pacey, the Institute’s policy and campaigns director, said the Institute was “pleased to have found a middle ground to benefit all those concerned”.

The PFRA added that it would now concentrate on fleshing out the bones of the new guidance around prospecting, which was why it asked the IoF to update the Code in the first place.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Free eNews

Society Network Foundation dismisses government's claim for grant refund

12 Sep 2014

The trustees of Society Network Foundation have rejected the Cabinet Office claim that the charity ought...

Dfid launches £150m fund for small and medium-sized charities

12 Sep 2014

The Department for International Development has launched a new fund, expected to be worth £150m over...

Shaw Trust income up 12 per cent but staff numbers down 11 per cent

12 Sep 2014

The Shaw Trust has seen a 12 per cent rise in its income, up to £107.8m, according to its 2013/14 annual...

Serco to end its involvement with the National Citizen Service

11 Sep 2014

Serco has not reapplied to deliver the volunteering programme the National Citizen Service, despite winning...

Electoral Commission's amendments to Lobbying Act guidelines 'a climbdown'

11 Sep 2014

The Electoral Commission has been forced into a climbdown over its guidance on the Lobbying Act, according...

Labour MPs are more supportive than Conservatives of charities challenging government policies

11 Sep 2014

Less than half of Conservative MPs believe charities should be able to challenge government policy, new...

Charities warned that digital campaigns can be 'counterproductive'

9 Sep 2014

Charity digital campaigns can be counterproductive and will need to change to keep the attention of those...

Twitter trials plans to allow users to donate to charity through its site

9 Sep 2014

Twitter has announced plans to allow users to donate to charity through the social media platform, as...

Fundraisers should engage more with older people online, new research shows

2 Sep 2014

Charities could be missing out on donations by not engaging with older people through online and mobile...

Join the discussion

Twitter button

@CSFundraising