Share

Compromise agreed on revised F2F code

Compromise agreed on revised F2F code
News

Compromise agreed on revised F2F code

Fundraising | 29 Oct 2008

The Public Fundraising Regulatory Association appears to have reached a compromise with the Institute of Fundraising on whether the new face-to-face code should contain a recommendation for practitioners to join the PFRA.

When the Institute published its first revision of the code in May, it had removed the stipulation that any of its members that carry out face-to-face fundraising “ought to” be members of the PFRA as well.

The PFRA was unhappy about this, and expressed its opposition in its response to the consultation and in meetings with the Institute.

Final recommendation changed slightly

Now the final code has been published with the recommendation reinstated, but slightly altered. It states that face-to-face operators “ought” to consult the PFRA before embarking on any kind of face-to-face activity, and “should” consider joining it in order to signal publicly that they are committed to best practice.

The PFRA issued a statement saying it “warmly welcomed” the new Face-to-Face Activity Code, which also covers prospecting as well as traditional street and door-to-door fundraising.

Parting shot across bows to Institute

But, in what could be interpreted as a parting shot across the bows to the IoF over the matter, the self-regulatory body made clear that it had garnered strong support from both the Association of Town Centre Management (ATCM) and the Charity Commission on the subject.

The ATCM is planning to publish new guidance shortly that will advise its members that they should engage with the PFRA on street fundraising, and the Commission’s forthcoming review of its Charities and Fundraising guidance is likely to emphasise that practitioners should join their relevant self-regulatory bodies.

Megan Pacey, the Institute’s policy and campaigns director, said the Institute was “pleased to have found a middle ground to benefit all those concerned”.

The PFRA added that it would now concentrate on fleshing out the bones of the new guidance around prospecting, which was why it asked the IoF to update the Code in the first place.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Free eNews

RNIB chief executive criticises ‘arrogance’ of MPs who think charities must learn from private sector

21 Nov 2014

Lesley-Anne Alexander, chief executive of RNIB, yesterday said she had a “struggle with the arrogance”...

Property boom poses risk to charities' long-term survival, survey reports

20 Nov 2014

Nearly half of charities consider property the greatest risk to their long-term survival, according to...

A quarter of charities 'ignore Commission action plans'

19 Nov 2014

Around one in four charities that the Charity Commission issued action plans to last year either partially...

RNIB chief executive criticises ‘arrogance’ of MPs who think charities must learn from private sector

21 Nov 2014

Lesley-Anne Alexander, chief executive of RNIB, yesterday said she had a “struggle with the arrogance”...

Don't lecture us on impact when government has failed to measure its own, Wilson told

21 Nov 2014

The minister for civil society was criticised yesterday for telling charities to measure their impact...

Volunteer managers say they need a stronger representative body

21 Nov 2014

The volunteering sector needs a more powerful representative body, volunteer managers have said in response...

OSCR launches new website

20 Nov 2014

The Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator has launched a new website which includes a new search function.

Data from controversial Samaritans app to be deleted

17 Nov 2014

Samaritans has promised that all data collected by its Twitter monitoring app will be deleted and the...

Post Office enables Children in Need donations through Twitter

11 Nov 2014

The Post Office has become the first UK organisation to allow Twitter users to donate to charity through...

Join the discussion

Twitter button

@CSFundraising