Sector tells Treasury to start gift aid reform before Budget 2011

Fundraising | Celina Ribeiro | 13 Oct 2010

The government is under pressure from a consortium of sector bodies to implement gift aid reforms before the next Budget, with a new letter to the Treasury emphasising the need to move more processes online.

Umbrella organisations involved in the Gift Aid Forum, including the Institute of Fundraising, Charity Tax Group, CFDG and NCVO have today written a letter to Justine Greening, economic secretary to the Treasury, asking for a raft of reforms and commitments ahead of Budget 2011.

The first reform that the group say should be implemented before the government’s first proper budget is the introduction of a gift aid database and dispensing with the currently mandatory paper declarations.

The Treasury is also asked to review the possibility of enabling online gift aid claims, allowing gift aid to be claimed on text donations, and simplifying the procedures around claiming the tax relief on fundraising sponsorship and auction income.

The issue of higher-rate taxpayer reform has been put to one side, with the group suggesting that in the longer-term government establish a separate working group to re-examine how those in the top tax bracket are encouraged to claim back and donate the tax paid on their charitable donations.

While acknowledging there are differences of opinion between the signatories to the letter, the group were united in the need for reform: “The reforms are essential in modernising gift aid, enabling it to keep up with technological and philanthropic developments over the coming years,” the letter reads.

Read the letter here.

Directory: Charity Finance Directors' Group (CFDG) | Charity Tax Group | Institute of Fundraising | National Council of Voluntary Organisations (NCVO)

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Name *

Email *

Organisation

Job Title

Comments *

Verification *

* Please read our Community Standards

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

Robust but respectful debate
Strongly held opinions
Intelligent relevant discussion
The sharing of relevant experiences
New participants

We will not publish:

Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
The posting of contact details for yourself or others
Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.