Share

CAF disappointed by payroll giving review

CAF disappointed by payroll giving review
News

CAF disappointed by payroll giving review

Fundraising | Celina Ribeiro | 12 Sep 2008

The Charities Aid Foundation (CAF) says it is “disappointed” with the Institute of Fundraising-commissioned review of payroll giving released in June this year, and is preparing to carry out its own research into why some companies have embraced the mechanism.

In a statement released by the organisation today, the last day for submission of responses to the review, CAF claims that some of the recommendations in it were “broad, undeveloped and untested as a consequence of the limited evidence base and analysis”.

“We welcome the review and recognise it as a valid contribution to the debate about increasing payroll giving. But what was promised as a ‘root and branch review’ has not given us the full picture, or suggested a clear way forward,” said CAF chief executive John Low (pictured).

Low’s disappointment was shared by numerous other industry leaders who spoke to Professional Fundraising magazine for this month’s analysis of reaction to the review. When speaking to PF earlier, Low said that the review was “coming from a very specific perspective” in that it represented the views of charities more than those of other organisations involved in payroll giving.

Today he reiterated his concern that donors and business had not been adequately consulted for the review, which was carried out by Strategy Complete on behalf of the Institute.

“Some companies are very successful at encouraging employees to give, and we need to understand what stands in the way of others.

"For this reason, we are offering to undertake robust research into the take-up and success of the scheme amongst donors and companies,” Low said.

CAF's head of PR Mandy Pursey added that CAF would now seek input from other sector organisations, including the Institute, about how this study should be shaped. She expected it would be a mix of quantitative and qualitative research with companies and donors, and would be conducted in the new year.

In his interview with PF magazine, Low also indicated that he would like to develop an online mechanism whereby charities could access all the details of their payroll donors, but that at present the scheme would be cost-prohibitive.

Better understanding of initiatives that have worked in the past, and better communication of the benefits of the mechanism, are key to driving payroll giving forward, Low said.

See Celina Ribeiro's blog on the payroll giving review and the sector's propensity to gaze at its own navel.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

emailalert

Tribunal upholds Commission's merger decision but orders changes

24 May 2012

The Charity Tribunal has upheld the Charity Commission’s decision to allow two independent schools in...

Tender is issued for £200m National Citizen Service contracts

24 May 2012

The Department for Education has issued an invitation to tender for delivery of the National Citizen Service...

Trustees 'should be free to seek total return investments without approval'

24 May 2012

The Charity Law Association has recommended trustees are given the legal freedom to invest on a total...

Tribunal upholds Commission's merger decision but orders changes

24 May 2012

The Charity Tribunal has upheld the Charity Commission’s decision to allow two independent schools in...

BIS consultation on volunteer-led events criticised

24 May 2012

A consultation launched by the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills has been criticised for...

Missing People plans to use Twitter to find child runaways

24 May 2012

Missing People is hoping to track down missing children using Twitter.

Charities in Twitter storm over balloon releases

24 May 2012

Charities are being urged to abandon balloon releases in a Twitter a campaign.

Missing People plans to use Twitter to find child runaways

24 May 2012

Missing People is hoping to track down missing children using Twitter.

Marie Curie opens national support centre and adds 140 staff

21 May 2012

Marie Curie Cancer Care has officially opened its new national support centre in Pontypool, Wales, creating...

Join the discussion

Twitter button

@CSFundraising