OCS reviews procedure for door-to-door licence rejections1

Fundraising | Tania Mason | 17 Sep 2010

The Office for Civil Society is reviewing the way it considers appeals by charities against local authority refusals to grant house-to-house collections licences.

The OCS plans to draw up new policy guidance as to the new procedures it will follow in considering appeals, and will circulate this to the sector for consultation shortly.

Until now, the Cabinet Office’s role in considering appeals has been limited to looking at how the licensing authority went about reaching its decision. It did not consider the merits of the licence application.

But after a charity challenged this, the Cabinet Office took legal advice and decided to review its approach. Now it is believed to consider that in order for the minister for civil society to properly comply with his statutory function under the Act, he should be making decisions on the basis of all the evidence available.

Mick Aldridge, chief executive at the Public Fundraising Regulatory Association which regulates all face-to-face fundraising, said he welcomed the review but was puzzled as to why the OCS felt it necessary, given the “tiny number” of instances where charities are refused licences.

Directory: Office for Civil Society | Public Fundraising Regulatory Association (PFRA)
Who's Who: Mick Aldridge

Place a comment

Sarah Tirrell
Policy and Codes of Practice Manager
Institute of Fundraising
20 Sep 2010

The Institute of Fundraising welcomes the OCS review on door-to-door collection licence rejections.

Under the current system, if a charity is refused a licence by one local authority, it has to be declared on all future applications to any local authority and consequently, it can lead to further rejections, which could be hugely damaging to a charities income from this fundraising stream. As the current recourse includes judicial review, this can be a huge drain on charity resources and public money.

Any review that could lead to guidance or simplification of the rules would assist the charity sector in its efforts to work with the public .

[Reply]

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Name *

Email *

Organisation

Job Title

Comments *

Verification *

* Please read our Community Standards

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

Robust but respectful debate
Strongly held opinions
Intelligent relevant discussion
The sharing of relevant experiences
New participants

We will not publish:

Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
The posting of contact details for yourself or others
Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.