Royal British Legion says Blair donation publicity is "no win" 1

Fundraising | Celina Ribeiro | 23 Aug 2010

The Royal British Legion’s chief has defended the charity’s acceptance of a sizeable donation from former Prime Minister Tony Blair, saying that rejecting the gift would have brought at least as much controversy as accepting it.

Chris Simpkins, director-general of the Royal British Legion, told The Times newspaper that acceptance of the gift - the proceeds and advance from Blair’s soon-to-be published memoirs - did not indicate that the charity endorsed the former PM’s politics.

The announcement last week that Blair would be directing the proceeds and advance from the book 'A Journey' (the advance said to be £4.6m) to the building of a new rehabilitation facility by veterans’ charity has prompted debate, but Simpkins said that the charity was in an “almost no win situation”.

“To have rejected it, I think, was likely to have stimulated equally adverse publicity,” he told the newspaper.

“What drives us in accepting this donation – aware obviously of the concerns which widows and the families of those who have been seriously wounded, indeed the wounded themselves might have – is, well, given that we need to support that group of people, wouldn’t it be a bit churlish of us to look a gift horse in the mouth?”

Simpkins also reiterated the charity’s non-partisan stance. “We don’t take a view on the political decisions which put our people in harm’s way,” he said.

Directory: Royal British Legion

Place a comment

Andrew Scadding
Thai Children's Trust
25 Aug 2010

The RBL has taken the only possible decision. Its first responsibility is to those left widowed, wounded or orphaned, and there is no doubt that this substantial donation leaves the RBL better placed to treat them generously. No-one who seriously cares for the welfare of the beneficiaries will withdraw support from the RBL as a result of their accepting Mr Blair's money, so there is no balance to be struck. Put that another way. Would the critics guarantee to find £4 million plus to compensate the beneficiaries if RBL returned the donation. No? Thought not!

[Reply]

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Name *

Email *

Organisation

Job Title

Comments *

Verification *

* Please read our Community Standards

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

Robust but respectful debate
Strongly held opinions
Intelligent relevant discussion
The sharing of relevant experiences
New participants

We will not publish:

Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
The posting of contact details for yourself or others
Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.