Share

Details of FRSB and PFRA collaboration on face-to-face complaints emerge

Details of FRSB and PFRA collaboration on face-to-face complaints emerge
News

Details of FRSB and PFRA collaboration on face-to-face complaints emerge

Fundraising | Celina Ribeiro | 14 Jul 2010

More details have emerged about what a collaboration between the Public Fundraising Regulatory Association and the Fundraising Standards Board will mean for collating face-to-face fundraising complaints.

The two bodies are working together to develop a system which will give fundraisers a fuller, more accurate picture of the level of public complaints about the fundraising mechanism.

The idea that is being worked on would see PFRA encourage its members to funnel complaints data through themselves into the FRSB. FRSB chief executive Alistair McLean said that just under a third of agencies signed up to the PFRA are not currently members of the FRSB, and that the FRSB was keen to get the non-member data fed into its annual complaints report.

“Mick [Aldridge] has confirmed to me that the PFRA have every confidence in the FRSB’s underlying complaints figures, the issue was that not all PFRA members were FRSB members and therefore it was reasonable for us to assume that not all complaints would be getting captured and reported by the FRSB in our annual report.

"He and I have both recognised this and have since met to see if we could ensure more accurate reporting,” McLean said.

“There was no plan or commitment to run anything parallel to the work of the FRSB as quite clearly that would be confusing and unhelpful.

"I should of course make it clear that as a consequence of not being members of the FRSB, neither their complaints nor their activity are recorded for our annual report, so in reality, we are reporting accurately, we just don’t have the full picture. This is something that the PFRA are keen to assist us in achieving.“

McLean said there can be difficulty in assessing complaints accurately because it is still undefined what an ‘engagement’ is in terms of face-to-face fundraising, and because of possible issues of agencies and charities reporting the same complaint twice.  However, he said he was “sure there was not any double-counting” in the latest complaint data released by the FRSB.

He said he had faith that the collaboration would bear fruit: “I’ll be very optimistic that we’ll have an even more accurate record of the complaints received by suppliers in next year’s report.”

McLean also had words of praise for the PFRA. “I think the PFRA have done a great job with site management, working with Trading Standards and developing real awareness at the coalface of face-to-face,” he said.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

emailalert

Tribunal upholds Commission's merger decision but orders changes

24 May 2012

The Charity Tribunal has upheld the Charity Commission’s decision to allow two independent schools in...

Tender is issued for £200m National Citizen Service contracts

24 May 2012

The Department for Education has issued an invitation to tender for delivery of the National Citizen Service...

Trustees 'should be free to seek total return investments without approval'

24 May 2012

The Charity Law Association has recommended trustees are given the legal freedom to invest on a total...

Tribunal upholds Commission's merger decision but orders changes

24 May 2012

The Charity Tribunal has upheld the Charity Commission’s decision to allow two independent schools in...

BIS consultation on volunteer-led events criticised

24 May 2012

A consultation launched by the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills has been criticised for...

Missing People plans to use Twitter to find child runaways

24 May 2012

Missing People is hoping to track down missing children using Twitter.

Charities in Twitter storm over balloon releases

24 May 2012

Charities are being urged to abandon balloon releases in a Twitter a campaign.

Missing People plans to use Twitter to find child runaways

24 May 2012

Missing People is hoping to track down missing children using Twitter.

Marie Curie opens national support centre and adds 140 staff

21 May 2012

Marie Curie Cancer Care has officially opened its new national support centre in Pontypool, Wales, creating...

Join the discussion

Twitter button

@CSFundraising