ASA rules 'sponsor a child' adverts are legitimate 1

Fundraising | Celina Ribeiro | 17 Jun 2010

Charity child sponsorship advertisements were given the green light this week by the Advertising Standards Authority in a ruling on a complaint about the adverts which nearly went against charities.

The ASA investigations team at first recommended that a complaint against Plan International’s sponsor a child television advert be upheld. The complainant alleged that the scheme was misleading in suggesting that donors’ money would go to an individual child, rather than to support children worldwide.

The recommendation, if it had been upheld, would have meant that all such sponsorship schemes, which are worth around £115m a year, would have fallen foul of the advertising regulator.

But after receiving a rebuttal from Plan International and a consortium of other charities, the ASA Council yesterday decided to overturn the recommendation of its investigations team. Plan had argued that donors would understand that ‘child sponsorship’ related to a personal relationship with an individual child who was benefiting from the charity’s work, made possible by donations.

Razi Mireskandari, partner at the law firm Simons Muirhead & Burton which advised Plan, said that the decision is a relief to charities. “If the ASA had upheld the complaint, it would have harmed the reputation and income of child sponsorship charities in the UK,” he said.

Place a comment

Andrew Cates
SOS Children
7 Mar 2011

This article is a little misleading in saying that "all such sponsorship schemes, which are worth around £115m a year, would have fallen foul of the advertising regulator"

There are plenty amongst the UK child sponsorship schemes, all of which are listed at http://www.sponsorachild.org.uk/different-uk-child-sponsor-charities where the child does directly benefit from sponsorship

[Reply]

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Name *

Email *

Organisation

Job Title

Comments *

Verification *

* Please read our Community Standards

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

Robust but respectful debate
Strongly held opinions
Intelligent relevant discussion
The sharing of relevant experiences
New participants

We will not publish:

Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
The posting of contact details for yourself or others
Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.