Funding search begins for Institute's think tank website 1

Fundraising | Celina Ribeiro | 8 Jun 2010

The Institute of Fundraising is seeking the funding for its “demand-led” think tank, which it plans to launch first as a website collating existing fundraising research.

In a document circulated by the Institute, the fundraising umbrella body estimates that the first phase of the project will cost £100,000 and last two years. It will involve the creation of a website signposting users to, and allowing user reviews of, existing research.

The cost will cover the salaries of a project manager and web developer over the two years, with marketing costs being absorbed by the Institute itself.

Lindsay Boswell, chief executive of the Institute, said that the organisation “will look anywhere” for funding, but has not yet started making grant applications.

The Institute is not yet sure how much funding it would need when the think tank begins commissioning, in year three, Boswell said, adding that first it will conduct a needs analysis.

Boswell said that the Institute has always been clear that setting up the centre is not one of its core funding priorities and that the think tank will never take any money out of Institute coffers. “We will only drive this forward once and if we’ve got funding,” he said.

He was, however, very confident that funding would be secured.

There is no firm time frame for the commencement of the building of the site or the appointment of individuals to the board which will oversee research, Boswell said.

Think tank priorities

While the first stage of the research centre will focus on bringing together existing research, after that the Institute will focus on commissioning research on general market data, donor behaviour, the external environment and stewardship and retention.

The Institute hopes that the centre will reduce duplication of research, plug gaps in the current literature and provide a one-stop-shop for fundraisers looking for research in the future.

The Institute embarked on plans to develop its own research centre after Boswell resigned from the board of the Centre for Charitable Giving and Philanthropy in December, complaining of a lack of relevance to and consultation with the profession.

Directory: Institute of Fundraising
Who's Who: Celina Ribeiro

Place a comment

Rarry Revan
Ranter
Rantingrules
8 Jun 2010

Demand led? Has Lindsay asked anyone apart from his Board whether they want this website set up?

The institute will need to look anywhere for the money cos there ain't much of it around. Bearing mind they don't really have a plan it may be too soon to approach grant makers cos in my humble experience they like to have a bit of meat on the bone if you know what I mean.

Rarry

[Reply]

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Name *

Email *

Organisation

Job Title

Comments *

Verification *

* Please read our Community Standards

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

Robust but respectful debate
Strongly held opinions
Intelligent relevant discussion
The sharing of relevant experiences
New participants

We will not publish:

Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
The posting of contact details for yourself or others
Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.