Share

Door-to-door complaints skyrocket as FRSB reports complaints up 67 per cent

Door-to-door complaints skyrocket as FRSB reports complaints up 67 per cent
News

Door-to-door complaints skyrocket as FRSB reports complaints up 67 per cent 3

Fundraising | Celina Ribeiro | 8 Jun 2010

Door-to-door fundraising recorded the biggest increase in complaints from the public last year, according to the Fundraising Standard’s Board annual report.

The fundraising mechanism drew 2,106 complaints in 2009, up 340 per cent from 2008 levels, against an increase in volume of only 78 per cent.

The FRSB’s annual report showed an overall increase in complaints of 67 per cent, to just under 13,000, but this is set against an expansion of the organisation’s membership and a dramatic improvement in the number of organisations reporting – up to 84 per cent last year as opposed to under two thirds the year before. Nineteen complaints reached stage two adjudication - one less than last year – and none made it to the more serious stage three. The 13,000 complaints arose from more than 2.7bn donor contacts.

But while door-to-door reported the most dramatic rise in complaint numbers, an increase the FRSB suggested could be put down to “more members, better reporting and higher response rates”, direct mail remains king of the fundraising complaints, attracting more than 5,000 complaints – 42 per cent of the total. Still, just direct mail attracts just three complaints in every 100,000 donor contacts.

Telephone fundraising pipped door-to-door to be the second most complained about fundraising mechanism, but with much lower volumes than reported in the latter approach.

While street fundraising last year gained its typically high level of public and media criticism, chuggers drew fewer complaints than raffle fundraising. However, charities appeared to dramatically reduce their street fundraising efforts last year, with member organisations reporting less than half the number of donor contacts in 2009 compared to 2008 - the most dramatic fall of any fundraising mechanism reported to the FRSB.

New media fared best of all in the complaint stakes, with dramatic year-on-years rises in donor contacts for both email (up 626 per cent) and online generally (825 per cent), but only mild increases in complaint levels of 11 per cent and 7 per cent respectively.

Alistair McLean, chief executive of the FRSB, said that the very low number of complaints that reached even stage two level adjudication proved that members have develop sound complaints handling procedures. “Member charities continue to fundraise at a very high standard across all disciplines and, on the while, complaints remain reassuringly low,” he added.

2009, it appears, was a good year for the FRSB itself, not only with the significant increase in members reporting complaints, but with the expansion of its membership base by an additional 272 members. The organisation’s push into Wales has also paid off, with a 65 per cent increase in members in the country.  

Method

2009 - Number of complaints

2009 - Number of contacts

2008 - Number of complaints

 2008 - Number of contacts

DIRECT MAIL

 5,081

200,392,580

 3,608

53,062,800

TELEPHONE

 2,147

4,719,957

 1,170

3,193,114

DOOR-TO-DOOR

 2,106

22,382,011

 479

12,582,340

DATA PROTECTION

 1,172

 

 238

 

OUTDOOR EVENTS

 530

957,245

 370

n/a

RAFFLES

 338

29,799,368

 117

11,167,990

STREET

 312

147,880

 227

403,370

EMAIL

 234

74,926,415

 211

10,324,126

DOOR DROPS

 224

131,296,211

 360

92,490,521

TV

 151

59,664,996

 58

1,564,369



Simon Buttenshaw
Fundraiser
Simon Buttenshaw
15 Jun 2010

The headline of the article is sensationalist and inaccurate. The number of complaints per 'donor contacts' for door to door is so low - 1 in 10,628 in 2009 - that expressing year on year increase in percentage terms is not really useful. If my organisation called on 10,000 households and we received 1 complaint I would be quite pleased at that figure. If we then called on 30,000 the following year and received 3 complaints, I would be equally pleased - even though our number of complaints had grown by 300%!!!!!

Peter Munro
Individual
None
9 Jun 2010

I am sceptical about the validity of these statistics in comparison to the number of contacts.

I'm phoned about once or twice a week by people seeking donations or more often regular support by direct debit for "charities". Often they start with "I'm not selling anything" or "We're doing a survey", and usually I just say goodbye. When I can spare the time to talk, I usually find that the person calling either doesn't know the correct name of the charity, can't tell me what they do, or knows their charity no - they might be genuine but I doubt it. It's occurred to me to complain to the charity but never to FRSB. In any case, even though I deal with many charities each week, I didn't hear about FRSB till May this year, and I think there will be many who are similarly ignorant. I suspect that if the FRSB advertised that one could complain to them, they might get inundated. Time is precious, and I think that most of the time most of us won't want to waste time complaining anyway.

PS Siu
Fundraiser
RNS
9 Jun 2010

It's interesting to read the complaint stats, I'd like the opportunity to read more and delve a little deeper into the complaints themselves to see if any trends emerge that point to an underlying problem eg 'over-enthusiastic' chugging, wrong £amount direct debited, irrelevent/gone-away DM etc.

The FRSB seems to be establishing its relevance to the market, it'd be interesting to track progress as its visibility continues to grow, perhaps to the stage where it'll issue its own best-practice guidance to members?

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

emailalert

Tribunal upholds Commission's merger decision but orders changes

24 May 2012

The Charity Tribunal has upheld the Charity Commission’s decision to allow two independent schools in...

Tender is issued for £200m National Citizen Service contracts

24 May 2012

The Department for Education has issued an invitation to tender for delivery of the National Citizen Service...

Trustees 'should be free to seek total return investments without approval'

24 May 2012

The Charity Law Association has recommended trustees are given the legal freedom to invest on a total...

Tribunal upholds Commission's merger decision but orders changes

24 May 2012

The Charity Tribunal has upheld the Charity Commission’s decision to allow two independent schools in...

BIS consultation on volunteer-led events criticised

24 May 2012

A consultation launched by the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills has been criticised for...

Missing People plans to use Twitter to find child runaways

24 May 2012

Missing People is hoping to track down missing children using Twitter.

Charities in Twitter storm over balloon releases

24 May 2012

Charities are being urged to abandon balloon releases in a Twitter a campaign.

Missing People plans to use Twitter to find child runaways

24 May 2012

Missing People is hoping to track down missing children using Twitter.

Marie Curie opens national support centre and adds 140 staff

21 May 2012

Marie Curie Cancer Care has officially opened its new national support centre in Pontypool, Wales, creating...

Join the discussion

Twitter button

@CSFundraising