A third of trust applications wasted

Fundraising | Celina Ribeiro | 5 May 2010

Charities have been warned that their trust fundraising strategies could be a waste of time and money as research finds that more than a third of applications for funding to grantmakers are ineligible.

Research released today by the Directory of Social Change (DSC) found that 361,000 out of just under one million grant applications made last year failed at the first hurdle of eligibility.

The DSC estimates that if each application in the sample – taken from the results of 2,500 grantmakers – was posted first class, the cost of the ineligible applications in terms of stamps alone was £141,000 in 2009.

Ben Wittenberg, director of policy and research at the DSC, said that the high proportion of ineligible applications was both the result of opaque trusts and fundraisers who do not read guidelines.

“We think this is important because the fewer ineligible applications could mean quicker responses to the eligible ones, better engagement with applicants, and possibly more resources to allocate as grants,” said Wittenberg.

For more about the current and state of grantmaking in the UK, look out for the May issue of Fundraising magazine.

Directory: Directory of Social Change (DSC)
Who's Who: Ben Wittenberg

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Name *

Email *

Organisation

Job Title

Comments *

Verification *

* Please read our Community Standards

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

Robust but respectful debate
Strongly held opinions
Intelligent relevant discussion
The sharing of relevant experiences
New participants

We will not publish:

Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
The posting of contact details for yourself or others
Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.