Share

Times chugger story riddled with mistakes, claims NPC

Times chugger story riddled with mistakes, claims NPC
News

Times chugger story riddled with mistakes, claims NPC

Fundraising | Celina Ribeiro | 24 Mar 2010

A Times article last weekend that encouraged the public not to give money to face-to-face fundraisers based its story on two-year-old Intelligent Giving blog entries and significantly misrepresented a senior figure from New Philanthropy Capital (NPC), the organisation claims.

In the article, journalist Lauren Thompson quotes “Heather Walker, of Intelligent Giving”, who left the organisation before Intelligent Giving moved under the control of NPC last year. It appears that Walker’s blog entries from 2008 have been represented by Thompson as a recent interview.

Thompson also quotes NPC head of strategy Tris Lumley (pictured) as saying “all chuggers care about is getting that £10 monthly direct debit… We believe that charities should inspire people through a connection with a cause, instead of targeting those who do not want to be approached on the street”. Lumley, however, claims he has been both misquoted and misrepresented.

NPC has demanded a retraction of the “factual mistakes” made in the article, headlined Beware the High Street fundraiser and published last Saturday. The organisation is expecting that a piece correcting the inaccuracies will be published next Saturday.

Civil Society
understands that the Public Fundraising Regulatory Authority and directors of fundraising at leading charities were angered by the piece, but have been reassured that the NPC and Lumley were inaccurately represented.

In an interview with Fundraising magazine (to be published in April’s issue), NPC chief executive Martin Brookes said that under NPC’s guidance Intelligent Giving would move away from the "confrontational and ascerbic" tone that some of the site’s past blogs and statements to the press possessed.

Following the release of the Times story, Brookes said: “NPC does not take a position on particular ways of fundraising, face-to-face, ‘chugging’, mailshot or whatever. In our opinion, fundraising should be done in whatever ways maximise income, increase the number of donors as well as their engagement with charities and, in particular, emphasises the impact charities have of people's lives.

“We think donors should look at a range of things when giving to a charity, including its leadership, and its results. Focusing on just fundraising costs is foolish in the extreme.”

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

emailalert

Gift Aid Small Donations Scheme 'too complex to have real impact'

25 May 2012

The Gift Aid Small Donations Scheme is welcome, but will only be effective if it is made less complex...

Tribunal upholds Commission's merger decision but orders changes

24 May 2012

The Charity Tribunal has upheld the Charity Commission’s decision to allow two independent schools in...

Tender is issued for £200m National Citizen Service contracts

24 May 2012

The Department for Education has issued an invitation to tender for delivery of the National Citizen Service...

Tribunal upholds Commission's merger decision but orders changes

24 May 2012

The Charity Tribunal has upheld the Charity Commission’s decision to allow two independent schools in...

BIS consultation on volunteer-led events criticised

24 May 2012

A consultation launched by the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills has been criticised for...

Missing People plans to use Twitter to find child runaways

24 May 2012

Missing People is hoping to track down missing children using Twitter.

Charities in Twitter storm over balloon releases

24 May 2012

Charities are being urged to abandon balloon releases in a Twitter a campaign.

Missing People plans to use Twitter to find child runaways

24 May 2012

Missing People is hoping to track down missing children using Twitter.

Marie Curie opens national support centre and adds 140 staff

21 May 2012

Marie Curie Cancer Care has officially opened its new national support centre in Pontypool, Wales, creating...

Join the discussion

Twitter button

@CSFundraising