Labour calls for £1m war legacy research fund
6 Feb 2012
Labour has called upon the government to provide a £1m research fund for charities to develop policy...
Female interim managers working in charities earned 15 per cent less than their male counterparts during the six months from June to December last year, new research shows.
Women charity interims earned an average of £466.50 a day compared with £537.50 per day for men.
The figures, released this week by recruitment agency Russam GMS, show that the disparity between men and women in the charity sector is twice as big as the difference between male and female interims generally.
Ian Joseph, head of the not-for-profit practice at Russam, said the scale of the disparity prompted the agency to investigate further, and it conducted a basic poll of a number of its charity interims.
“We wanted to find out if there was any difference in women’s and men’s attitudes to three different things – money, negotiation, and how prepared they were to reduce their rates in order to secure a job,” he said.
“But we found there was no difference between them at all in terms of the willingness to negotiate or be pragmatic and accept lower rates than they were used to.”
Therefore, the only explanation Joseph could fathom for the disparity is that the roles that tend to be higher-paid, such as chief executive or finance director jobs, also tend to attract more male applicants.
“In my years of experience as a recruiter, shortlists for FDs are generally all or predominantly male, whereas interim jobs in HR or fundraising, which are not quite as well-paid, generally attract more women.
“That’s the only explanation I can think of,” said Joseph. “Of course fundamentally it’s wrong, and even worse that there is more disparity in a sector that espouses diversity and equality.”
The inequality of opportunity and reward between the genders has been thrust into the spotlight this week in a number of ways following International Women’s Day on Monday. Channel 4 has released a report showing that women are outnumbered two to one by men on TV; Gordon Brown has threatened “serious action” to force companies to appoint more female directors, and a coalition of charities led by the Fawcett Society has launched a ‘What about women?’ campaign to encourage the political parties to pay more attention to women voters in the election campaign.
However, the gender disparity in pay for charity interims comes against a backdrop of better news generally - overall pay for charity interims rose by 4 per cent over the six months. The study showed that the average daily rate in the voluntary sector rose from £499 in June 2009 to £521 in December 2009.
6 Feb 2012
Labour has called upon the government to provide a £1m research fund for charities to develop policy...
6 Feb 2012
Tackling youth unemployment should be a priority for all sectors, says Acevo CEO Stephen Bubb, as a new...
3 Feb 2012
An independent investigation into alleged financial irregularities at Charity Business has revealed that...
6 Feb 2012
Tackling youth unemployment should be a priority for all sectors, says Acevo CEO Stephen Bubb, as a new...
6 Feb 2012
The Charity Commission’s head of large charities, Beryl Hobson, has quit the regulator to start up her...
2 Feb 2012
Staff at the Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator are more motivated than they were, have a greater...
6 Feb 2012
An East Sussex-based animal welfare charity has launched a new website in a bid to increase online donations...
31 Jan 2012
4Children has launched its new website to provide clearer information about its work and campaigns as...
31 Jan 2012
The European Commission has set out its proposal to reform data protection laws that would mean organisations,...
Rowena Lewis
Head of Fundraising and Development
The Fawcett Society
11 Mar 2010
Thanks for highlighting Tania.
So we now know that women interim managers are paid 15% less than men in the same role, that the pay gap between male and female fundraising directors stands at 11.5%, and that female CEOs are paid on average £7,550 less than their male counterparts.
The stark reality is that the sector that prides itself on championing social justice harbours its own unacceptable gender pay gap.
Can we afford the implication that women are worth 15% less than their male counterparts? Of course not. It's high time voluntary sector employers and key sector bodies united to identify where pay discrepancies lie, and to begin to address the gender pay gap.
Only then can we hold a mirror to the sector and boast that we not only champion social justice for our beneficiaries, but practice what we preach with our people.
[Reply]
Sue Donoghue
participant
women's mental health
13 Mar 2010
Response to [ Rowena Lewis]
Siiiiigh! It would be interesting to pull apart the statistics. What exactly was being compared? How are the benchmarks for the salaries of such posts created?
For example, were all the posts that were considerd part of national organisations or subject to local market forces?
Was it that where a post was advertised with a salary band, females disproportionately started at and stayed at,the lower end? How many of the posts had been long established and therefore had a historically rated remuneration? How many accepted the posts based on ethical factors, for example, knowing the post was slightly under remunerated, working for that particular organisatin/sector made the sacrifice worthwhile?
Having worked with a Local Authority in a Trade Union role as they addressed their pay inequality under Single Status... I know that to truly make a difference requires time, resources and committment, but doing nothing or leaving the sector to patchwork piecemeal action will make the mountain harder to climb and efforts expended will be swallowed by the bigger aniamal.
Onwards and upwards : )
[Reply]