Help donors choose which charities to support, says Saxton

Fundraising | Gemma Ware | 16 Jun 2008

Charities are not doing enough to help their donors choose between them, according to Joe Saxton, driver of ideas at nfpSynergy.

In the opening plenary of the PF Conference on 21 May, Saxton said that compared to the multitude of choices consumers are offered in their everyday lives between brands of chocolate, mobile phones or cleaning products, charities rarely offer their donors anything to make it easy to choose between them.

He used five bottles of cleaning product to illustrate his point. While he said it was simple for a shopper to tell what ‘Hob Brite’ did compared to ‘Mr Muscle Bathroom Cleaner’, when he labelled each of the bottles as a major children’s charity and asked the audience to explain the difference between what they did, the majority could not.

“I think one of the difficulties is we have not provided for most people, in most situations, mechanisms for choosing between charities,” he said. “I think punters need and want to choose between charities, and when they say ‘I think there are too many charities in the sector’, that is code for ‘I don’t know how to choose between them’.”

Saxton went on to say that charities increasingly looked like an “out-of-date part of society” that had not changed at a fast enough pace. “One of the dangers is we have left people thinking what charities do is much the same as it was 20 years ago,” he said.

Charities should intertwine giving with living, he said. “The best fundraising is where people are not sure whether their motivation is for their benefit or for charities’ benefit,” he said, but added that fundraisers should create products that allowed people to know exactly how they should give and what they would get.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Name *

Email *

Organisation

Job Title

Comments *

Verification *

* Please read our Community Standards

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

Robust but respectful debate
Strongly held opinions
Intelligent relevant discussion
The sharing of relevant experiences
New participants

We will not publish:

Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
The posting of contact details for yourself or others
Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.