Share

Charities considered greenest, but opinion divided on ‘junk mail’

Charities considered greenest, but opinion divided on ‘junk mail’
News

Charities considered greenest, but opinion divided on ‘junk mail’

Fundraising | Stefan Marseglia | 4 Mar 2010

The civil society sector is perceived by consumers as being more environmentally friendly than any other market sector, new research has revealed.

The Sustainability Tracker Study, which monitors the attitudes of UK consumers on environmental issues, found that over a third of adults believe charities are environmentally friendly, with only 3 per cent arguing otherwise.

In terms of advertising mediums, while email is considered the greenest communication route, direct mail is not perceived as potentially environmentally-harmful, ranking seventh on a list of 12 “potential hazards”, according to the survey of more than 2,400 respondents.

There was, however, a distinct difference in reaction to unaddressed and personalised direct mail. Thirty per cent of respondents said that unpersonalised leaflets were “the most harmful to the environment”, in comparison to 17 per cent who viewed addressed mail as damaging. In both categories fewer consumers ranked direct mail the most environmentally harmful of a number of activities, which included discarded gadgetry and plastic bags, than when the same survey was conducted in autumn 2008.

Robert Keitch, chief of membership at the Direct Marketing Association which commissioned the research, said that the tide of public opinion has shifted. “The notion that the direct marketing industry needs to take greater responsibility for its environmental impact is no longer revolutionary, nor is it in dispute. The mounting threat of ever-tougher environmental legislation is a clear sign that it is now time for the industry to take decisive action to meet its environmental obligations.”

Luan Wise, marketing manager at ONEPOST, feels that more is needed to be done to overcome the ‘junk mail’ label associated with some direct mail sent by charities and other types of organisations.

“While this is good news, there is a clear difference in the response between unpersonalised leaflets and personally addressed direct mail,” said Wise. “The industry is working hard to overcome the 'junk mail' tag and these results are promising indicators of our efforts to achieve this.”

The study which took place between December 2009 and January 2010 was commissioned by ONEPOST and carried out by fast.MAP for the Direct Marketing Association.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

emailalert

Charities highlight financial risk of Work Programme to MPs

9 Feb 2012

Baroness Stedman-Scott, chief executive of Tomorrow’s People, has said her charity, which is sub-contracted on...

Perrin handed 18-month sentence for tax fraud through charity gift loophole

9 Feb 2012

Professional tax adviser David Perrin has been sentenced to 18-months imprisonment for trying to defraud...

Government sees active role for charities in new £1bn Youth Contract

9 Feb 2012

Employment minister Chris Grayling has said that he expects charities to be active in the delivery of...

London Mayor opens social enterprise support centre

9 Feb 2012

A new headquarters and hub for social enterprise support organisations has officially opened in London...

Christian Aid dumps head of fundraising role

8 Feb 2012

Christian Aid has “disestablished” its head of fundraising role as part of a new approach to fundraising...

Health committee recommends joined-up social care commissioning

8 Feb 2012

The key to securing better outcomes for older people and other vulnerable groups is joined-up services,...

Wellcome Trust to give employees more choice over IT devices

9 Feb 2012

The Wellcome Trust plans to give its employees more choice over the type of device they use for work.

Animal charity shifts fundraising priority from legacies to online

6 Feb 2012

An East Sussex-based animal welfare charity has launched a new website in a bid to increase online donations...

4Children reveals new website

31 Jan 2012

4Children has launched its new website to provide clearer information about its work and campaigns as...

Join the discussion

Twitter button

@CSFundraising