Conservatives will expect even more of sector, admits Letwin

Finance | Vibeka Mair | 27 Jan 2010

Conservative MP Oliver Letwin has said the Tories will ask the voluntary sector to go beyond its current capacity if it wins the next election.

Letwin (pictured), speaking at the NCVO's Campaigns Conference yesterday, was responding to a delegate’s warning that the sector had “an abject terror” of a possible Tory leadership, especially after spending so many years forging links with the current government.

“The voluntary sector is the foundation step of what we want to achieve,” Letwin maintained. “The question is whether we are going to be demanding too much of the third sector and be too interested in working with it."

“We will ask you to go beyond your current capacity. Therefore we will build the capacity of big organisations and tiny ones."

Continuing with the theme of public service delivery, Letwin said the sector should be paid by results or grants, not "process-based, micro-managed contracts".

“You can’t build or replicate capital on the basis of full cost recovery or micro-management from government. You must bid on circumstances to make a reasonable profit and plough it back into growing services.”

Tory government would 'expect more for less'

However, Labour candidate Chuka Umunna challenged the Conservatives' plans for the voluntary sector, arguing charities would be expected to “step up” and fill the gap left by big government but without extra funds to do so effectively.

He said the role played by the state would be pivotal in this year’s election. He highlighted the government’s intervention to prevent a deeper banking crisis as an example of why state intervention was a “force for good”.

Directory: National Council of Voluntary Organisations (NCVO)

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Name *

Email *

Organisation

Job Title

Comments *

Verification *

* Please read our Community Standards

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

Robust but respectful debate
Strongly held opinions
Intelligent relevant discussion
The sharing of relevant experiences
New participants

We will not publish:

Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
The posting of contact details for yourself or others
Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.