Legacy income falls not as drastic as predicted

Fundraising | Celina Ribeiro | 16 Dec 2009

The legacy market is unlikely to fall as drastically as economists first predicted, according to the latest report.

In the spring Legacy Foresight predicted that the value of legacies could fall by as much as 12 per cent from its height in the third quarter of 2007, but the group has been forced to revise its prediction down to a 5 per cent drop.

Meg Abdy, director of Legacy Foresight, told Civil Society that the revision is the result of economists becoming more optimistic about the trajectory of the recession. “The general consensus is that the economy is picking up more than had been predicted, although it’s still going to be quite a slow and painstaking recovery, even though the recession hasn’t been quite as deep as it was thought six months ago.”

However, she warned that the near future is not all bright for legacies.

The Legacy Market Monitor released this week by Legacy Foresight reported a combined legacy income of £864m for the year ending September 2009 for its 38 consortium members, just 1.2 per cent below the previous year.

The report authors warn, however, that this “better-than-feared performance” is due to a bounce back in share and house prices, and predict that prices of both are likely to fall again next year. On the back of this bounce, residual bequests, which account for 85 per cent of the total legacy income earned, came in at an average of £53,000 – just slightly under highs recorded in the first quarter of 2008.

“It’s too early to say that it’s all over and just going to be rosy from now on," she said. "It’s likely next year that house prices and share prices will fall back a bit. So this could be a quite a short-term uplift, and then it will fall back a bit, but it won’t be as bad as we originally predicted.”

Directory: Legacy Foresight

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Name *

Email *

Organisation

Job Title

Comments *

Verification *

* Please read our Community Standards

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

Robust but respectful debate
Strongly held opinions
Intelligent relevant discussion
The sharing of relevant experiences
New participants

We will not publish:

Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
The posting of contact details for yourself or others
Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.