Rape Crisis hopeful of funding lifeline

Fundraising | Tania Mason | 1 Nov 2007

The inclusion of sexual violence targets within the government’s new Public Service Agreements could be the catalyst for reversing the decline in funding to rape crisis centres, according to some voluntary sector groups.

The Women’s Resource Centre has joined forces with NAVCA and Rape Crisis Centres to produce a briefing paper calling on local infrastructure organisations, such as councils for voluntary action, to lobby local councils to allocate funds to rape crisis services in order to help meet the proposed targets.

The briefing provides practical advice that such organisations can use to get sexual violence on the agendas of local government agencies. It has been produced to coincide with the current renegotiation of Local Area Agreements.

Rape Crisis Centres have been sustaining funding cuts for some time and are now facing a crisis. In 1984 there were 68 centres in England and Wales but now there are just 38 affiliated groups. The organisation fears that up to half of these will close in the near future unless local partnerships step in to fund specialist services.

NAVCA chief executive Kevin Curley (pictured) said the “dire funding situation” for Rape Crisis Centres had come about because there were no local targets for reductions in sexual violence.

“The new Public Service Agreements and National Indicators provide the best opportunity yet to get sexual violence priorities in to Local Area Agreements,” he said.

Angie Conroy from Rape Crisis (England and Wales) said support from other infrastructure groups should help to address the “postcode lottery” of rape crisis service funding.

Directory: National Association of Voluntary and Community Action
Who's Who: Tania Mason | Kevin Curley

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Name *

Email *

Organisation

Job Title

Comments *

Verification *

* Please read our Community Standards

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

Robust but respectful debate
Strongly held opinions
Intelligent relevant discussion
The sharing of relevant experiences
New participants

We will not publish:

Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
The posting of contact details for yourself or others
Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.