Share

BBC charities blame production teams for phone-in debacle

BBC charities blame production teams for phone-in debacle
News

BBC charities blame production teams for phone-in debacle

Fundraising | Gemma Ware | 1 Jul 2007

BBC Children in Need, Comic Relief and Sport Relief have sought to distance themselves from the recent revelation that television producers had deceived viewers by using fake competition winners for viewer phone-ins.

But the Charity Commission is looking at the cases to see if it needs to take further action.

The charity appeals were part of a group of six television and radio shows that were found to have duped the public. The wrongdoings came to light after Mark Thompson, director general of the BBC, ordered an inquiry after a trailer for a documentary wrongly implied the Queen had stormed out of a sitting with photographer Annie Leibovitz.

In the case of BBC Children in Need the competition was part of a live BBC Scotland broadcast that offered a location visit to the set of the children's programme Raven as a prize.

A spokeswoman for the charity said ten complaints had been received to date.  She added: "There was a communications breakdown between the call centre and the BBC Scotland programme-making team, followed by an error of editorial judgement on the part of the programme-makers, which led to a fictitious winner being read out on air. We would like to reassure our supporters that donations to Children in Need were not affected in any way.

"We hope that this indicates our supporters have understood the distinction between the BBC Scotland programming and the operations of the charity itself, which were not implicated in the findings of the BBC's initial report into breaches of editorial standards."

No one was available for interview from Comic Relief or Sport Relief, with communication staff directing Charity News Alert towards its website for a statement, which expressed the organisations' disappointment at the news.

"In both of the reported incidents relating to Comic Relief and Sport Relief, the BBC production teams were found to be at fault," said the statement. "Even though Comic Relief is being profiled in the current news agenda we hope that our supporters will continue to trust Comic Relief and understand that this story is about the internal workings of the BBC."

The Charity Commission said it was aware of the BBC's statement with regard to the charities and added:  "We are currently looking at the points that have been raised to determine if there is a role for the Charity Commission in relation to this."

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Free eNews

Nandy demands PM inquiry into Big Society Network grants

24 Jul 2014

Lisa Nandy, the shadow minister for civil society, has written to David Cameron demanding an inquiry into...

Nesta: ‘We were not forced to fund Big Society Network’

24 Jul 2014

Nesta has denied a claim by a former board member that it was “forced” to provide start-up funding...

Barnardo's launches retail gift aid appeal

23 Jul 2014

Barnardo’s has launched an appeal to raise awareness of retail gift aid and the extra £6.5m that could...

Nandy demands PM inquiry into Big Society Network grants

24 Jul 2014

Lisa Nandy, the shadow minister for civil society, has written to David Cameron demanding an inquiry into...

Workfare charities set to be named after Tribunal rules against DWP

23 Jul 2014

Charities that are involved in the workfare programme run by the Department for Work and Pensions look...

Dove Trust charities will be paid a third of what they are owed

23 Jul 2014

The charities and good causes owed money by the Dove Trust, owner of the suspended fundraising website...

Greenpeace video removed from YouTube following copyright claim

14 Jul 2014

A campaign video by Greenpeace against Lego’s relationship with Shell has been subject to a copyright...

Oxfam advert removed after appearing before extremist videos

10 Jul 2014

Oxfam has removed one of its adverts from YouTube after it was shown on channels showing content from...

Data protection proposals 'potentially catastrophic' for fundraising

8 Jul 2014

EU data protection proposals could have a “potentially catastrophic” impact on charity fundraising,...

Join the discussion

Twitter button

@CSFundraising