Share

Fundraisers still frustrated by No Cold Calling Zones, despite Charities Act

Fundraisers still frustrated by No Cold Calling Zones, despite Charities Act
News

Fundraisers still frustrated by No Cold Calling Zones, despite Charities Act 2

Fundraising | 1 Jan 2007

Charities that fundraise door-to-door and abide by the Public Collections Regime in the new Charities Act, could still fall foul of No Cold Calling Zones, according to a top charity lawyer.

Anne-Marie Piper (pictured), a partner at law firm Farrer and Co and an expert on fundraising regulation, told PF that No Cold Calling Zones, the initiative that outlaws door-to-door sales and marketing within specific residential areas, will render ineffective the section of the Charities Act that deals with public collections.

"The regime is designed to regulate door-to-door fundraising," said Piper. "Fundraisers could go through all the processes required by law yet find that [the area] clashes with a No Cold Calling Zone."

The Public Collections Regime states that door-to-door collectors must inform the local authority that a collection is taking place, but do not need a permit. No Cold Calling Zones, however, forbid cold calling from taking place within specific boundaries, regardless of whether a fundraiser or salesperson is abiding by the law.

The situation is confused by a lack of clarity from Trading Standards as to what constitutes cold calling. "There is no common definition," said Piper. "In some parts of the country door-to-door fundraising would not be regarded as cold calling, while in other areas it is."

Further still, No Cold Calling Zones could be in breach of the European Unfair Commercial Practices Directive, which is due to come into force in December this year.

"This has clearly got very complicated and I will be watching the situation carefully. If we can't get rid of No Cold Calling Zones altogether then they need to be done logically," said Piper. 

The initiative falls under the remit of the Trading Standards Institute and was introduced to help reduce levels of doorstep crime. The Institute claims that only 2 per cent of UK homes are located in No Cold Calling Zones. However, in some parts of the country, such as Bedford, large areas encompassing thousands of homes fall under them.

A Cabinet Office spokesperson, said: "The government supports the aim of reducing door step crime but does agree that the Trading Standards Institute should work with the charity sector to ensure its reputation and legitimate right to fundraise is protected."

The Trading Standards Institute was unavailable for comment.

Sarah
20 Feb 2013

I think if you have a 'no cold calling sign' in your window or street it means you should have the right to sit in your living room in your mismatching pjs without fear of a fundraising knock on the door. I am all for charity but I do it in my own time, I help out at charity shops, donate my spare change from a coffee and buy little pin badges at the tills.. What I can't stand is these sob stories that get pushed on you whilst you politely show the world your holey socks and lack of bra support as some lady tells you how your neighbourhood has been amazing in their support (making you feel like you should too) and as you reach in your pocket for the change they explain you must set up a direct debit of a minimum of £5 a month!! This is all of a sudden a £60 a year commitment they want you to give and before you know it you've burnt your dinner and your dogs run out the front door under your legs!!! I understand its a tough old world for fundraising but come sell me a calendar or a pin badge, don't set me up a lifelong pain in the arse bank charge! Then you feel bad telling them to shh because they really are wasting everyone's time.. Pfftt!

Stephen Floyd
Antique Dealer
Antique Dealers
24 Oct 2010

I believe NO COLD CALLING ZONES are a breach of my human rights. I have been cold calling for over 20 years. Never done anything illegal, never done anything wrong. These zones are now springing up everywhere.

Police should target INDIVIDUAL law breakers and not target EVERYONE by introducing these zones.

You may as well ban CARS in order to target speeders! It's unfair, it's lazy policing and it's an infringement on my civil liberties.

It seems this country is becoming a very oppressive place to live.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Free eNews

RNIB chief executive criticises ‘arrogance’ of MPs who think charities must learn from private sector

21 Nov 2014

Lesley-Anne Alexander, chief executive of RNIB, yesterday said she had a “struggle with the arrogance”...

Property boom poses risk to charities' long-term survival, survey reports

20 Nov 2014

Nearly half of charities consider property the greatest risk to their long-term survival, according to...

A quarter of charities 'ignore Commission action plans'

19 Nov 2014

Around one in four charities that the Charity Commission issued action plans to last year either partially...

RNIB chief executive criticises ‘arrogance’ of MPs who think charities must learn from private sector

21 Nov 2014

Lesley-Anne Alexander, chief executive of RNIB, yesterday said she had a “struggle with the arrogance”...

Don't lecture us on impact when government has failed to measure its own, Wilson told

21 Nov 2014

The minister for civil society was criticised yesterday for telling charities to measure their impact...

Volunteer managers say they need a stronger representative body

21 Nov 2014

The volunteering sector needs a more powerful representative body, volunteer managers have said in response...

OSCR launches new website

20 Nov 2014

The Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator has launched a new website which includes a new search function.

Data from controversial Samaritans app to be deleted

17 Nov 2014

Samaritans has promised that all data collected by its Twitter monitoring app will be deleted and the...

Post Office enables Children in Need donations through Twitter

11 Nov 2014

The Post Office has become the first UK organisation to allow Twitter users to donate to charity through...

Join the discussion

Twitter button

@CSFundraising