Share

Lord Grade announces membership of Fundraising Regulator board

Lord Grade announces membership of Fundraising Regulator board
News

Lord Grade announces membership of Fundraising Regulator board

Fundraising | Hugh Radojev | 11 Feb 2016

Lord Grade, chair of the Fundraising Regulator, has today announced the eight people who will make up its board.

Lord Grade (pictured) confirmed the appointment of eight individuals to the board at Fundraising Live, Civil Society Media's annual conference for the fundraising sector.

He also promised to listen carefully to concerns about the Fundraising Preference Service - intended to allow donors to opt out of all charity communication - and suggested that it would take into account "the legitimate right of charities to raise funds from the public". 

He also said that 50 charities had been asked to provide start-up funding for the new regulator, in advance of a levy which will provide its long-term funding. He said that 28 had done so, and all were expected to contribute.

Board appointments

In his speech, Lord Grade said he was “delighted” at the appointments made so far but said that he was still looking to appoint two additional members.

“I am delighted that today we have been able to announce the members of our Board,” Lord Grade said. “You will notice that we have not yet struck the right balance between regulatory experience, fundraising expertise and wider knowledge of the charitable sector. We are in the process of recruiting two additional members with fundraising expertise”.

The eight members of the Fundraising Regulator’s board announced today are: George Kidd, chair of the Fundraising Preference Service working group; Suzanne McCarthy, chair of the Institute of Fundraising’s Standards Committee; Margaret Moore; a trustee of Sue Ryder; Sacha Deshmukh, chair of War Child and vice chair of Citizens Advice; Michael Smyth chair of Community Links; John Stoker, director general of the National Lottery and Jenny Williams, former chief executive of the Gambling Commission.

Theresa Shearer, chair of the Fundraising Working Group in Scotland will also attend board meetings “until such time as charities who raise funds in Scotland consider the options presented” to the group.

According to a statement from the regulator, the role will require board members “for at least one day per month and will be remunerated at £300 per day”. The appointments are for a fixed, two year term, with the “possibility of a further term subject to open competition”.

Grade said the next steps would see the creation of a standards committee and an adjudication and complaints committee.  An advisory group to represent the views of consumers will also be recruited.

Structure of the regulator

Grade also said that 28 of the 50 fundraising charities asked to provide start-up funding for the new Regulator, prior to the annual levy kicking in, have provided in-principle agreement for the funds. Grade said he expected all 50 to do so.

The regulator will be independent, own the Fundraising Code of Practice, and be funded by the levy on the larger fundraising charities, he said. It will work closely with the Charity Commission, the Information Commissioner, the Institute of Fundraising and the Public Fundraising Association. 

The regulator will be fully operational by early summer and would have a full complement of 15 to 20 staff.

Media frenzy

"We live in difficult and interesting times, our sector is being subjected to something of a media frenzy and I suspect there may well be more to come because as the narrative takes hold it is hard to shake off,” He said.

"Nobody can be in any doubt that the allegations of poor fundraising practice are damaging public confidence in the sector or risking damaging public confidence.

"Some will say that this is unfair and disproportionate when set against the wonderful work that charities do, that the media storm will blow over and that bad practice is confined to large and medium-sized charities anyway. I say that is a risky prescription for effective public relations. Charities cannot afford to sit on their hands."

Name and shame

Grade said the Etherington Review proposed three lines of defence against unacceptable fundraising practices: trustees, the Fundraising Regulator and the Charity Commission, "in that order". 

"It is time for trustees and senior managers to stand up and be counted and make an unequivocal commitment to best practice in fundraising and the new regulatory regime," he said.

"If they do so then many of the problems can be resolved without external intervention. That is my key message of today."

"We will be values-driven and support charities to do the right thing and make the necessary cultural changes. But in cases where best practice is not evident we will not hesitate to investigate and make recommendations and amend the Code as we go along in light of cases we see.

"Where a charity declines to accept our recommendations we will take steps to enforce compliance. Our sanctions will include naming and shaming, orders to cease and desist, and a requirement to improve future fundraising campaigns.

"The Charity Commission will provide the backstop to the Fundraising Regulator and if all else fails we will refer to them contentious cases....with all the implications that entails."

Grade accepted that regulators only succeed if they have the support of the sectors they regulate, and he was aware that his new organisation has to be "fair, transparent, proportionate and ready to listen to the genuine concerns of the sector as well as the concerns of the public".

"But if we are to play our part in rebuilding public trust in the sector, our first accountability must be to the public, to donors like Olive Cooke and Samuel Rae."

Fundraising Preference Service

Grade added that he recognised there was much concern, speculation and fear about the proposed Fundraising Preference Service, but he gave an assurance that those concerns would be listened to by the working party currently devising the FPS.

"I don't want to pre-empt the working group's deliberations but in examining how a simple opt-out might operate, we are conscious of the need to achieve a balance between on the one hand the legitimate right of charities to raise funds from the public and communicate with committed supporters and on the other hand the need to protect donors from undue pressure."

And the regulator will take careful account of the proposals on explicit and unambiguous consent on communications and data transfer that will be included in the General European Regulation on Data Protection. He said he welcomed the IoF's changes to the Code banning the selling of data and requiring explicit consent for data sharing.

Work through umbrella bodies

He told the audience that the conversations that the regulator will have with the sector over the coming weeks and months would be conducted through their representative bodies, as there is not enough time or resources to meet individual charities.

He is aware that the introduction of a stricter regulatory regime could create "unintended consequences" and "we do need to listen".

"The last thing we want to do is interfere with genuine ethical fundraising activities... It is imperative we get this right for the future health of the charitable sector."

But he concluded that the impact of the new regulation will be driven by the fundraising practices of the sector.

"If the sector takes this seriously, our interventions will be few and far between.  So my plea today, to the whole sector, is for you to give us a really quiet life."

In response to a question from the floor about who would decide how to proceed with the FPS working group's recommendations, Grade said that although Parliament would unquestionably take an interest, decisions would be made by the Regulator's board.

"We will be very transparent about the decisions we make, which recommendations are accepted or rejected and why," he said.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Tags

Charities must be central in government’s Brexit strategy, says CAF

26 Sep 2016

Charities must play a crucial role in supporting the government to deliver a Brexit strategy, a new report...

Foundations should have to spend a minimum amount, says charities committee Lord

26 Sep 2016

Lord Rooker has said that charitable trusts should not see their capital as “sacrosanct” and that...

Transforming Rehabilitation programme failed to make the most of charities

23 Sep 2016

The Transforming Rehabilitation programme did not realise the full potential of the third sector and squeezed...

MEP: Charities must make their voices heard during Brexit discussions

26 Sep 2016

A Labour MEP has said that charities have a “crucial” role to play as Britain redefines its relationship...

Aid agencies must stand up to DfID, says ActionAid’s director of programmes

26 Sep 2016

Aid agencies are becoming too dependent on the Department for International Development and instead should...

Charity sector criticises draft guidance on warnings power

23 Sep 2016

Charity representative bodies have told the Charity Commission that they have serious concerns about its...

Barnardo’s launches ten-year strategy with plans to double fundraising income

22 Sep 2016

Barnardo’s has announced a ten-year strategy which will aim to grow income by a third and change its...

Charities urge donors to give their first plastic £5 note to a good cause

19 Sep 2016

A social media campaign is urging people to donate their first plastic £5 note to charity, after the...

Pennies has now raised £7.5m through 32 million micro-donations

9 Sep 2016

Pennies, a micro-donation tool, has announced that it has now raised over £7.5m for some 200 charities...

Join the discussion

Twitter button

@CSFundraising