Small charity representatives claim they could be unfairly hit by FPS

Small charity representatives claim they could be unfairly hit by FPS

Small charity representatives claim they could be unfairly hit by FPS

Fundraising | Hugh Radojev | 10 Feb 2016

Small charities could be cut off from their supporters because people will use the Fundraising Preference Service without thinking of local organisations, according to a document handed to the chair of the FPS working group.

The Institute of Fundraising and Small Charities Coalition jointly hosted a forum on the ongoing changes to fundraising regulation in London last week. After presentations by both Stephen Dunmore, interim chief executive of the Fundraising Regulator (pictured) and George Kidd chair of the FPS working group, representatives went off into breakout groups to discuss the proposed changes.

The key issues which came out of those sessions have now been published and distributed to both Dunmore and Kidd, as well as to the wider small and medium charity sector.

Amongst the most pressing issues raised, relate to the ongoing “confusion” surrounding the proposed Fundraising Preference Service. Representatives have called upon the working group and the regulator to continue to “engage” and to give small and medium sized organisations “opportunities to feed in views”.

A summary document issued by the IoF and SCC said that the term “reset”, first set out in relation to the FPS in the original Etherington Review, is “concerning” as the vast majority of existing and would-be donors “only think of large ‘brand’ charities and don’t immediately think of smaller, local charities.

“A ‘reset’ will happen because of one piece of direct mail from a large charity without understanding the relationships will stop,” the document said.

There was also fears expressed that an FPS might mean that larger charities will “do more street or door to door fundraising” which in the process might make “other forms of fundraising more expensive”, in effect pricing smaller organisations out of fundraising all together.

Concerns were also expressed about the proposed ‘fundraising levy’ which will pay for the existence of the Fundraising Regulator. The setting of the levy amount “must be proportionate and not overburdensome,” said representatives and the regulator should “consider phasing in or different payment options for charities to manage costs”.

Small charities also called upon Stephen Dunmore and the Fundraising Regulator as a whole to take a more active role in “engaging with the public and with press/media/politicians” on behalf of fundraising organisations. Many representatives wondered whether the Fundraising Regulator would be more proactive in explaining “why charities need to ask for support” or would instead only speak publicly about “bad practice and complaints”.


[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear


  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

HMRC assures charities of ‘soft landing’ approach in Common Reporting Standard guidance

26 Aug 2016

HMRC has published new Common Reporting Standard guidance, which assures charities that it will implement...

Access Foundation to invest endowment in social investment

24 Aug 2016

Access: the Foundation for Social Investment has announced it will put its endowment from the Cabinet...

Charity investigated after it did not know its own income

23 Aug 2016

The Charity Commission has opened an inquiry into a charity that underestimated its own annual income...

Commission appoints interim manager to dissolve charity being investigated over investment tactics

26 Aug 2016

The Charity Commission has appointed an interim manager to oversee the winding up of the Park Charitable...

Association of Charitable Foundations' chief executive will step down this year

25 Aug 2016

David Emerson is stepping down as chief executive of the Association of Charitable Foundations later this...

Charity Commission should ‘avoid the temptation to look tough’ when it starts disqualifying trustees

24 Aug 2016

Other infrastructure bodies have joined NCVO in raising concerns about how the Charity Commission might...

Free HR system to launch for charities

25 Aug 2016

A free human resources system designed for charities will launch next month and is currently being trialled...

RSPCA ranked fourth in global charity social media brand index

19 Aug 2016

A new social media index has said that the RSPCA has the fourth best digital charity brand globally, with...

Charity Commission retracts story which indicated it would no longer publish all accounts

18 Aug 2016

The Charity Commission has published a news story announcing it will no longer display documents received...

Join the discussion

Twitter button