Share

Northern Rock Foundation CEO calls for more data about foundation giving

Northern Rock Foundation CEO calls for more data about foundation giving
News

Northern Rock Foundation CEO calls for more data about foundation giving

Fundraising | Jenna Pudelek | 1 May 2014

Collecting and analysing more data about foundation giving at a local level is "imperative", the chief executive of the Northern Rock Foundation has said. 

Speaking at the launch of the Association of Charitable Foundation’s (ACF) report on foundation giving trends on Wednesday, Penny Wilkinson, chief executive of the Northern Rock Foundation, said there was a “crucial gap” in the data that needed to be filled.

The Northern Rock Foundation, which announced last week that it was being forced to close after failing to reach a funding agreement with Virgin Money, the new owner of Northern Rock bank, began carrying out local level research on the voluntary sector in the North East and Cumbria, the areas where it funds, in 2007.

Wilkinson said: “There is a set of data not yet available that is a crucial gap that needs to be filled – where foundations are spending their money.”

The ACF’s research includes country level analysis of the percentage of its members funding in England (93 per cent), Wales (40 per cent), Northern Ireland (35 per cent) and Scotland (42 per cent), but not regionally.

It also shows that foundations gave grants of £174m to arts and culture in 2011/12, up 16 per cent on the previous year.

“It is good news for the cultural sector but what does it mean?” Wilkinson said. “Is it good news for all cultural sector organisations or just some? Is it a trend across the UK or is it concentrated in certain parts of the country and in certain types of institutions?”

She said some foundations, including Esmée Fairbairn and Garfield Weston, did report on regional levels of spending, but it was not comprehensive across the sector.

“The funding landscape is so challenging,” she said. “It is imperative now, especially if the government sees the foundation sector as a means of achieving national policy objectives.
 
“If it is concentrated somewhere, people tend to think it is down south, but we might be wrong, it is important for the capacity and sustainability of the voluntary sector outside those areas, it is essential for foundations to report on where as well as what they fund.”

Wilkinson also made a case for the need to “drill down” into what is funded within wide categories such as ‘older people’ and ‘social welfare’.

Top causes are health and social welfare

The ACF’s report, which was produced with the Centre for Giving and Philanthropy at Cass Business School and supported by the Pears Foundation, shows the top funding areas are health and social welfare, which are funded by 38.5 per cent of ACF members.  

“I wanted to know more about the breakdown within those categories. How much is going to supporting the most vulnerable such as victims of domestic and sexual violence, refugees and asylum seekers,” she said.

As the report points out, foundations have the independence to fund neglected or unpopular causes, the projects that government agencies cannot or will not support and to challenge received wisdom. But Wilkinson questioned whether the sector knew that was happening.

Wilkinson said the individual experience of Northern Rock Foundation, which is number 48 in the top 300 UK foundations, giving £8.7m in the year to December 2012, was reflected in the trends revealed by the report.

The report shows grantmaking is up but total income has fallen. “We were faced a major reduction in income in 2011 and 2012 and decided it was important to spend capital to continue to make grants rather than reduce support,” she said. “Our trustees felt it was the right decision given the funding challenges faced by the voluntary sector and the rising need.”

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

HMRC assures charities of ‘soft landing’ approach in Common Reporting Standard guidance

26 Aug 2016

HMRC has published new Common Reporting Standard guidance, which assures charities that it will implement...

Access Foundation to invest endowment in social investment

24 Aug 2016

Access: the Foundation for Social Investment has announced it will put its endowment from the Cabinet...

Charity investigated after it did not know its own income

23 Aug 2016

The Charity Commission has opened an inquiry into a charity that underestimated its own annual income...

Commission appoints interim manager to dissolve charity being investigated over investment tactics

26 Aug 2016

The Charity Commission has appointed an interim manager to oversee the winding up of the Park Charitable...

Association of Charitable Foundations' chief executive will step down this year

25 Aug 2016

David Emerson is stepping down as chief executive of the Association of Charitable Foundations later this...

Charity Commission should ‘avoid the temptation to look tough’ when it starts disqualifying trustees

24 Aug 2016

Other infrastructure bodies have joined NCVO in raising concerns about how the Charity Commission might...

Free HR system to launch for charities

25 Aug 2016

A free human resources system designed for charities will launch next month and is currently being trialled...

RSPCA ranked fourth in global charity social media brand index

19 Aug 2016

A new social media index has said that the RSPCA has the fourth best digital charity brand globally, with...

Charity Commission retracts story which indicated it would no longer publish all accounts

18 Aug 2016

The Charity Commission has published a news story announcing it will no longer display documents received...

Join the discussion

Twitter button

@CSFundraising