Share

British public want right of reply on fundraising, says Lord Hodgson

Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts, MP
News

British public want right of reply on fundraising, says Lord Hodgson2

Fundraising | Jonathan Last | 1 May 2013

Lord Hodgson has said that he still receives regular feedback from a public frustrated about both the charitable sector’s fundraising practices and the lack of an outlet to express its dissatisfaction.

Speaking at the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Civil Society and Volunteering yesterday, Hodgson revealed that he gets emails every week long after he conducted his review of the Charities Act 2006.

“When I started my review, I didn’t expect to find the degree of unhappiness about how funds are raised,” he said. “Fundraising remains an issue, and the public doesn’t feel the sector has responded to its disquiet in a cohesive and coherent way. People feel it ‘passes the parcel’.”

Hodgson said that members of the public feel overwhelmed by all the fundraising methods charities use, from ‘chuggers’ to direct mailing and phone calls.

He suggested that people would welcome a straightforward method of venting their complaints: “I still get three or four emails a week months after I finished my review, people saying ‘Have you heard about this? Do you know about that?’ The public want one number, one email they can go to with their complaints where they know they will be answered.

“The sector needs to get together to get a coherent process the public can understand is working, and [make it aware] how the public can receive advice.”

The remuneration issue

Hogdson said he feels this would be essential for maintaining public confidence in the sector, and also brought up the oft-raised issue of the public’s trepidation about remuneration in charities. “There must be education if the sector is to have public trust and affection,” he warned.

Rhodri Davies, head of policy and campaigns at the Charities Aid Foundation (CAF), was one of three speakers at the meeting, and he agreed with Lord Hodgson that anything that could endanger public trust is a concern.

He said: “I think there is a conversation that needs to be had about the balance between the potential short-term gains of some fundraising methods – and there is evidence that they do work, they do bring money in – and if that in the long-term they damage the public’s trust. What is the cost to benefit analysis of that?”

Davies also stressed that there is an education issue about explaining to the public where its money goes and why that is an appropriate use: “People often raise the issue of administration costs, as if that is a great way to tell the difference between a ‘good’ and a ‘bad’ charity. I’m very concerned about that.

“It fails to make the distinction between a charity that does very good work and spends a reasonable proportion on necessary admin, and a poor charity that has little or no impact and spends very little on admin.”

Impact reporting is key

Davies concluded that this was all a symptom of charities not always being able to demonstrate their impact tangibly, which he said would make the public happier that charity money was being well spent.

The other two speakers at the APPG meeting agreed that demonstrating impact was at the core of the issue. Lily Caprani, director of communications and policy at the Children’s Society, said that the sector “needs to take responsibility for not being especially good at reporting impact in a meaningful way”.

And chief executive of Catch22 Chris Wright backed up the idea that charities need to educate and inform the public about exactly what they do. He pointed out that people have a right to know where their tax money is being spent, especially in the case of charities delivering public services.

Michael1974
25 May 2013

Sadly the charities never resolve the issue. The public want proper regulation not fobbing off with some nonsense from "supporter care teams". Charities never advise complainants to contact the FRSB if they're dis-satisifed, the PFRA still refuses to publish its compliance data and it's been nearly two months since I submitted a complaint to Friends of the Earth about their chuggers (who claimed they were regulated by the council despite the absence of any legislation and site management agreement) and I still haven't had a response.

Hodgson still gets e-mails because the fundraising sector isn't listening and because the Charities Commission won't prosecute private fundraising firms who break charity law.

You can't trust chuggers, and you can't trust the charities that use them.

Ian Clark
Director
fundraising strategy
1 May 2013

I do hope Lord Hodgson responds to all these complaints that go straight to him, telling them that the right way to raise an issue is directly with the charity concerned. Only if dis-satisfied with the response should you approach the relevant national regulator for resolution.

Every other sector (banks, shops etc), exhausting the organisation's complaints process before venturing to the national adjudicator. The charity sector follows the same model.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Free eNews

VSO's income increased by £11.6m in 2013/14

30 Jul 2014

Voluntary Services Overseas saw its income increase by 20 per cent to £68.7m in 2013/14, according to...

Syria and Haiyan appeals boost Oxfam income by 6 per cent

30 Jul 2014

Oxfam’s total income rose by more than £21m to £389m in the year to March 2014, according to its annual...

Man admits stealing £300,000 from collections for Help for Heroes

29 Jul 2014

A man has admitted pocketing £300,000 donated by members of the public who believed it would go to Help...

Commission investigates charity over concerns it was used for private benefit

29 Jul 2014

The Charity Commission has opened a statutory inquiry into grant-giver the Catalyst Trust over concerns...

PTA-UK: Big Society Network chief was confident of funding

28 Jul 2014

PTA-UK has revealed that it turned down an invitation from Big Society Network to be a partner in its...

Big Society Network chair’s company gave £64k to Conservative Party

28 Jul 2014

A company owned by the chair of Big Society Network donated services totalling more than £54,000 to the...

Online donations forms are too long and cost charities donations, finds report

28 Jul 2014

One third of leading charity websites require potential donors to complete more than 20 actions before...

Greenpeace video removed from YouTube following copyright claim

14 Jul 2014

A campaign video by Greenpeace against Lego’s relationship with Shell has been subject to a copyright...

Oxfam advert removed after appearing before extremist videos

10 Jul 2014

Oxfam has removed one of its adverts from YouTube after it was shown on channels showing content from...

Join the discussion

Twitter button

@CSFundraising