Share

Small charities priced out of online ads around London marathon

Small charities priced out of online ads around London marathon
News

Small charities priced out of online ads around London marathon

Fundraising | Gemma Ware | 1 Jan 2008

Early December saw over 90,000 people waiting eagerly to see which magazine the postman would bring, Accepted or Rejected – the Flora London Marathon’s way of notifying runners who had got through its entry ballot. At the same time, event fundraisers were springing into action, either trying to persuade successful entrants to run for their charity or offering any of their own remaining places to the unlucky ones.

Next year, things will be different. Following the runaway success of a trial entry system for the 2008 race which saw 10,000 ballot places being filled within five days, the whole application process will go online for the 2009 race. It is also being moved forward, with applications now opening on race day in April.

The changes will allow runners to both apply and confirm their place online. This means advertising around the entry ballot on the marathon’s website will be at a premium for charities, especially as the marathon will also do away with the magazine that previously held the postal entry form – a key tool alongside the Accepted and Rejected magazines where charities advertise for potential runners keen to sidestep the ballot and guarantee entry, often in exchange for around £1,500 in sponsorship.

However, advertising online for runners is not cheap. All sales are handled by a company called Realbuzz.com, a running website which is the marathon’s online partner. Realbuzz offers a number of advertising packages to charities, the more expensive of which come with guaranteed places in the Flora London Marathon.

For the 2009 race, a £9,995 package of banner adverts on the marathon’s site comes with three marathon places for 2009; while for £22,250 charities can buy a gold package of skyscraper adverts on the homepage and online entry section complete with eight marathon places. Other lower profile packages, such as £950 for a place in an alphabetical list of charities, do not come with marathon places.

In addition, some of RealBuzz’s advertising packages on other races run by the Flora London Marathon, such as the Hydro Active Women’s Challenge runs in London, Birmingham and Liverpool, also come with marathon places.

Dave Bedford, race director of the Flora London Marathon, said Realbuzz paid the marathon £300 for each of the places handed out as incentives. This is the same amount charged per place to charities that have golden bonds – the marathon’s system guaranteeing permanent places in the race. Bedford said there were a set number of places given to Realbuzz to use as incentives, but refused to reveal how many.

The money made during the sale of the advertising is split between Realbuzz and the London Marathon Charitable Trust, which organises the marathon and gives any profits out in grants to community and recreation projects. “There is an agreed split between us. [Realbuzz] have to cover their costs and they have to make a profit,” said Bedford. However, he refused to reveal what the split was and Realbuzz refused to comment.

Many of the charities that buy the larger online advertising packages, such as Cancer Research UK and Children with Leukaemia, are those known to already have a high number of golden bond places in the race. Other charities without golden bond places are forced to pay the high advertising price to get any places, meaning that some ask runners to raise large amounts to cover costs.

However, Bedford disagreed that the places given as part of Realbuzz’s advertising packages should instead be given to the 500 charities on the waiting list for golden bond places in the marathon. “No, because we have a responsibility to maximise the income for the London Marathon Charitable Trust and that is what this does.”

Bedford denied that the system was unfair on charities without golden bond places that could not afford the high cost of online advertising. “There are something like 80,000 charities out there that don’t have places in the marathon,” he said. “Our opportunity is to work with our partners. We’re now working with more than 2,000 charities across a year, but clearly cannot work with them all. Those charities that find this and other opportunities that we put forward as effective from a fundraising point of view will take part in them, and those that do not, will not.”

Some of the disgruntled may soon turn elsewhere. Talk of a second marathon for charity runners have developed and PF has learnt that one events organiser is well underway with plans to launch a new half-marathon in London in October 2008.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

emailalert

Tribunal upholds Commission's merger decision but orders changes

24 May 2012

The Charity Tribunal has upheld the Charity Commission’s decision to allow two independent schools in...

Tender is issued for £200m National Citizen Service contracts

24 May 2012

The Department for Education has issued an invitation to tender for delivery of the National Citizen Service...

Trustees 'should be free to seek total return investments without approval'

24 May 2012

The Charity Law Association has recommended trustees are given the legal freedom to invest on a total...

Tribunal upholds Commission's merger decision but orders changes

24 May 2012

The Charity Tribunal has upheld the Charity Commission’s decision to allow two independent schools in...

BIS consultation on volunteer-led events criticised

24 May 2012

A consultation launched by the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills has been criticised for...

Missing People plans to use Twitter to find child runaways

24 May 2012

Missing People is hoping to track down missing children using Twitter.

Charities in Twitter storm over balloon releases

24 May 2012

Charities are being urged to abandon balloon releases in a Twitter a campaign.

Missing People plans to use Twitter to find child runaways

24 May 2012

Missing People is hoping to track down missing children using Twitter.

Marie Curie opens national support centre and adds 140 staff

21 May 2012

Marie Curie Cancer Care has officially opened its new national support centre in Pontypool, Wales, creating...

Join the discussion

Twitter button

@CSFundraising