Share

Majority of public thinks government spends too much on international aid

Majority of public thinks government spends too much on international aid
News

Majority of public thinks government spends too much on international aid 3

Fundraising | Vibeka Mair | 4 Mar 2013

Over 70 per cent of the public think that Britain spends too much on international aid, but only 38 per cent think that spending money from the UK’s aid budget on peacekeeping and other defence-related projects is right.

Some 2011 people were quizzed by ComRes on the news that Prime Minister David Cameron was considering reassigning funding from the Department of International Development to defence.

Around 71 per cent of respondents said that the government spent too much on international aid – Britain currently spends £10bn a year on foreign aid, which amounts to 0.6 per cent of the national income.

Further, 64 per cent said that the UK should no longer give international aid to India.

However, only 38 per cent of those quizzed think that the government is right to consider spending money from the UK’s aid budget on peacekeeping and other defence-related projects. But almost the same amount of people – 35 per cent – think that the government is right to consider spending some of the aid budget on defence.

Over half (57 per cent) think that international aid money should be spent on projects related to education, poverty and fighting disease rather than defence.

Responding to the findings, Carolyn Miller, chief executive at Merlin, said the NGO community had to focus its efforts on showing that aid money is well spent:

Merlin is well known and loved by our supporters who, because they know how wisely we spend UK aid money, do not, I think make up the majority of those who want to see investment significantly reduced or changed. The more people know about the long term benefits of our work and that of other NGOs supported so generously by governments, the more they will see that this tiny proportion of national income is making a huge difference. The NGO community must continue to focus efforts showing aid money is well spent. The success stories are there, they just need more oxygen and attention.”

Alice Allan, head of advocacy at international development charity Care International added:

“The international community recommended that countries should spend a minimum of 0.7 per cent GNP on aid 40 years ago. The UK, whilst committed, still hasn’t met this target. There are 170 million people around the world suffering from malnutrition, and more than one billion people live on less than a dollar a day, so even though we are experiencing tough times in Britain, it is right that we meet our aid commitments.”

 civilsociety.co.uk

Want access to all civilsociety.co.uk content?

Subscribers gain access to all expert advice, analysis, surveys, special reports and the full archive of content from as little as £43.20 per year. Find out more... 

Anon
Trustee
7 Mar 2013

In answer to Simon Whitehouse's comment the details survey report are available http://www.comres.co.uk/polls/ITV_News_Index_25_February_2013.pdf
and the specific question was "Do you agree or disagree with each of the following statements? ... The Government spends too much money on international aid"
The over 55's were the worst age group, along with those on state pension and those in the East Midlands!
ComRes interviewed 2011 British adults online from 22nd to 24th February 2013.
It is a depressing view but I think that that question was always likely to lead to the view that the government spends too much on aid and would probably have led to the same result if you substitute benefits, immigrants or any of a host of topics for aid.

Adrian Beney
Partner
More Partnership
6 Mar 2013

This survey simply tells us how unwise it is to ask the public certain questions! If a country, government, charity or other body believes in something which appears to be just and right, then just because the "general public" don't agree is a very bad reason to stop doing things which are right and just.

Simon Whitehouse
4 Mar 2013

The article doesn't tell us what the actual questions were that were asked, how people were selected or whether they were asked over the phone, in the street or indeed, while walking out of Conservative Central Office.

I'm really not sure there's anything useful to be learnt from this.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Charities are not doing enough to defend themselves over pay, conference hears

1 Jul 2015

Charities are not doing enough in response to attacks on chief executive pay, a Directory of Social Change...

VAT tribunal judgment on investment management fees worth tens of millions to the sector

30 Jun 2015

Charities should be able to reclaim VAT on investment management fees, a tribunal has ruled, in a move...

St John Ambulance records first operating surplus in seven years

30 Jun 2015

First-aid charity St John Ambulance has recorded its first operating surplus in seven years, as its income...

Breast Cancer Now loses a quarter of its staff after merger

30 Jun 2015

Breast Cancer Now has reduced staff numbers by a quarter since the merger, through a mix of redundancy...

Charity ordered to seek advice on reclaiming £130,000 missing funds from former trustee

30 Jun 2015

A charity has been ordered to seek independent advice on reclaiming £130,000 of missing income after...

Trustees must answer to the public over high chief executive pay, says minister for civil society

29 Jun 2015

Trustees must do more to give the public confidence in charities, and must make sure charitable donations...

Contactless donations set to soar, CAF study suggests

24 Jun 2015

There is a “massive future” for charity donations using contactless payment technology, according...

RBG Kew denies pressuring TripAdvisor into deleting hundreds of negative reviews

22 Jun 2015

Kew Gardens has denied claims that it pressured travel site TripAdvisor into deleting negative reviews...

JK Rowling charity scoops top prize at Charity Awards 2015

19 Jun 2015

A charity set up by JK Rowling ten years ago to close children’s institutions and orphanages in developing...

Join the discussion

Twitter button

@CSFundraising