Share

Payroll giving should be opened up to private sector, says Treasury

Sajid Javid, Economic Secretary to the Treasury
News

Payroll giving should be opened up to private sector, says Treasury2

Fundraising | Tania Mason | 24 Jan 2013

The Treasury wants to scrap the requirement that all payroll giving agencies must be charities, saying that opening up the marketplace to commercial players would drive down costs and promote innovation and investment.

The change is proposed in the government’s long-awaited consultation on how to reform payroll giving, to make it easier to administer and drive up the amounts raised for charity through the scheme.

Published this morning, the document also suggests introducing standardised sign-up forms for all donors, employers and agencies; reducing the time it takes for a donation to reach a charity from 60 days to 30, and forcing agencies to be transparent to donors about the fees they charge to process donations.

And it recommends creating “exit packs” for donors that stop giving through the scheme, to help them continue their relationship with the charity.

However, it stops short of recommending that offering payroll giving should become mandatory for all employers. “It should instead be a choice for employers, taking into account the demands from their employees and the costs associated with enrolling in the system.”

The government recognises though, that as one of the UK’s largest employers, it has a responsibility to lead by example and promises to “follow best practice in the operation and take-up of payroll giving”.

At present, just 2 per cent of employers offer payroll giving and 3 per cent of employees donate through the scheme.  Donations are deducted from gross pay, meaning that a £1 donation to charity costs a basic-rate taxpayer 80p and a higher-rate taxpayer 60p.

Last year, £118m was given through payroll giving by 738,000 people.

Commercial payroll giving agencies

There are currently 12 active payroll giving agencies (PGAs) operating in the market.

The consultation said it is “not clear that the requirement for PGAs to have charitable status is necessary”, and pointed to the emergence over the last decade of new commercial outfits that have “changed the landscape of giving whilst safeguarding the interests of charities and donors”.

It went on: “It is essential that the next decade of payroll giving is characterised by PGAs that embrace new technologies, to ensure that payroll giving is made as dynamic, appealing and as cost-effective as possible to donors, employers and charities. This is unlikely to occur under a single monopolistic provider.

“Opening up the supply of payroll giving services to new operators, including commercial operators, has the potential to drive down costs, result in technological change and innovation that leads to better services for donors, employers and ultimately charities.”

Transparency about fees

In order to improve transparency, the government added: “We are minded to introduce a requirement for all PGAs, including charities, to tell donors and potential donors how much they charge to operate payroll giving including any costs to charities. This will ensure a level playing field between providers.”

Regulation of the market

The document also touches on regulation of the market and invites views on whether any activities of PGAs might be suitable for self-regulation or statutory regulation.  It also asks if HMRC, the current regulator, needs a broader range of powers to ensure compliance with the regulations.  At present, the only penalty available is a complete removal of the agency’s status.

Announcing the consultation, Economic Secretary to the Treasury, Sajid Javid MP (pictured), said payroll giving has “real untapped potential, not just for raising money for charity directly, but also for starting a giving culture among those that do not normally donate”.

The deadline for submissions is 19 April 2013.

Jeremy Colwill
Director
Payroll Giving in Action
25 Jan 2013

The consultation document is welcome but some of the facts are “behind the curve”
Competition is good and speeding up the process and transfer of funds is definitely desirable.
Payroll Giving in Action has been at the forefront of speeding up the flow and quality of data from the donor to the charity with online and mobile Payroll Giving. We are the only organisation to have a paperless system for fundraisers that also includes address validation at the point of sign up.
Payroll Giving has changed in the last few years.
In the introduction of the Consultation document it says “online and joined up solutions to digitise the process do not appear to be widely available” This is incorrect and we have worked with all the PGA’s to digitise the process for donors, payroll departments and charities.
The main equation we should now overcome is:-
Encouraging employers to take up the scheme + encouraging employees to donate = donors and income for charities.

Peter Maple
Director for postgraduate fundraising courses
LSBU
24 Jan 2013

Interesting, having read the consultation document, it is clear that after all this time the Government (and perhaps some of the leading players) still don't get it.

Payroll giving works when applied in one of two ways.

Firstly when the the employer allows a canvass to happen (on behalf of and paid for by a syndicate of charities, but of course accepting any nominated charities). Cathy Sullivan and other agencies were doing this successfully in the 1990s and I understand Royal Mail sign ups were over 10% of the workforce.

Secondly, when the company champions the idea, the board and senior managers all sign up to the most tax efficient way of giving and employees are actively encouraged to follow suite with both specific, charity of the year, nominations and the ability to give to personal favourites.

Simples

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Free eNews

Commission contacts Bradley Wiggins' charity over concerns about how it has spent donations

29 Aug 2014

The Charity Commission has contacted the trustees of the Bradley Wiggins Foundation after the charity...

Royal Institution rules out selling Mayfair HQ after reducing its debt

27 Aug 2014

The Royal Institution, the science communication charity, has said it will not have to sell its London...

Action for Blind People makes redundancies

27 Aug 2014

Action for Blind People has said it made nine redundancies in the year ending March 2014, following an...

Lawyers call for animal charity to have greater crime-fighting powers

29 Aug 2014

Lawyers in Scotland have called for a Scottish animal charity to be granted greater powers to investigate...

Commission contacts Bradley Wiggins' charity over concerns about how it has spent donations

29 Aug 2014

The Charity Commission has contacted the trustees of the Bradley Wiggins Foundation after the charity...

Bubb responds to attack on charity campaigning in The Times

28 Aug 2014

Sir Stephen Bubb has written to The Times criticising an article which attacks charities for lacking transparency...

EU data protection proposals would kill fundraisers’ mailing lists, says report

28 Aug 2014

Proposed EU data protection rules could destroy mailing lists relied on by charity fundraisers, and would...

Macmillan: We did not hijack #icebucketchallenge

21 Aug 2014

Macmillan has hit back against accusations on social media that it has hijacked #icebucketchallenge, saying...

Smart wristbands aim to increase charity giving

20 Aug 2014

A new wristband that will enable people to make faster donations with just a tap of a smartphone, is...

Join the discussion

Twitter button

@CSFundraising