Share

Olympic Games will cost £377m less than anticipated

Olympic Games will cost £377m less than anticipated
News

Olympic Games will cost £377m less than anticipated

Fundraising | Niki May Young | 23 Oct 2012

The cost of the 2012 Olympic Games is forecast at £377m under its original budget, the Department for Culture, Media and Sport announced this morning, a sum that would cover almost 90 per cent of the lottery funding borrowed from its good causes fund to pay for the Games.

£2.175bn of funding in total was provided by the Lottery to help pay for the Olympics, £638m of this originated from the Big Lottery Fund (BIG), £425m of which would have been earmarked for good causes. 

The total cost of the Games is now forecast as £8.931bn, £377m less than the £9.298bn budget. Some £480m of "uncommitted contingency" remains within the budget, the DCMS advises, however "£103m of contingency is being held to cover the remaining risks in the programme, such as retrofit of the Olympic Village for legacy use and closing out around 2,000 Olympic Delivery Authority and LOCOG contracts".

'Money is clearly there to pay back BIG'

Ahead of the Games the Directory of Social Change launched the Big Lottery Refund campaign to apply pressure to ensure the return of the £425m of good causes funds. The government had promised the funds back to the lottery pot before the end of the games, the campaign argues, but failed to commit to this and the funding has yet to be returned. 

Ben Wittenberg, director of policy and research at DSC, said today's announcement was proof that it was not necessary to take the additional funding from BIG in the first place:

"Charities have been effectively underpinning the contingency. It's bad enough that the money was taken from charities in the first place to contribute to the Olympics, but to then find out that it was only taken as contingency is not a good use of funds that could otherwise have supported tens of thousands of voluntary organisations. It's even more reason for them to pay it back immediately," he said.

"I can't see anything about how they're going to allocate it but the main thing is they've clearly got the money to be able to pay back what they took from BIG," he added.

In the DCMS's final quarterly report on the Olympics, it advised: "The centrally-held contingency funding remaining in the £9.3bn Public Sector Funding Package (PSFP), currently forecast at £377m, is largely the remainder of the government’s contribution to the PSFP. This will be retained by HM Treasury, though any monies remaining at the conclusion of the programme in the Olympic Lottery Distribution Fund will be transferred to the National Lottery Distribution Fund for the benefit of the Lottery good causes."

However no date is advised for when this will happen.  Lottery minister John Penrose has previously indicated that this will not be paid back until at least the mid-2020s and potentially not until 2030/31. "This timeframe is simply not acceptable. A repayment schedule lasting several decades is not credible or reliable and we will continue to press for a much clearer commitment from Government to refund the Lottery immediately after the Olympics conclude," the DCS has said.

The National Lottery is also to benefit from the sale of the Olympic Village in March 2014. Half of these funds will go into the Big Lottery Fund pot and in September it announced that it would set up an Olympics legacy trust with the proceeds. The DCMS reports the total sum paid to lottery distributors as £69m, meaning BIG will receive £34.5m.

An additional £675m will be paid back to the National Lottery from the sale of land in the Olympic Park in response to its £675m contribution to the PSFP when it was increased in March 2007.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Free eNews

Crime prevention charity will challenge rate relief decision

17 May 2013

The Public Safety Charitable Trust plans to appeal this week’s High Court ruling that it cannot claim...

Centre for Social Impact Bonds launches new tools

17 May 2013

The Cabinet Office’s Centre for Social Impact Bonds has developed two new tools to assist the development...

New Sorp cleared for sector consultation

17 May 2013

The Financial Reporting Council, which oversees financial reporting in the UK and Ireland, yesterday agreed...

Charity governance is stuck in the past, finds leadership review

16 May 2013

While management in the charity sector has changed significantly in the past few decades, a reluctance...

Charities urged to end unpaid internships

15 May 2013

The union Unite and Intern Aware have called on charities to stop unpaid internships, saying it...

Roald Dahl charity seeks sector's views on new strategy

15 May 2013

As Roald Dahl's Marvellous Children's Charity seeks to expand its remit to provide support to any child...

Sector needs a 'data manifesto', says leadership review

17 May 2013

The voluntary sector should create a “data manifesto” that identifies who holds data about the sector...

Charity governance is stuck in the past, finds leadership review

16 May 2013

While management in the charity sector has changed significantly in the past few decades, a reluctance...

Your picks of the week

13 May 2013

Your CivilSociety rounds-up the most read stories from the previous week.

Join the discussion

Twitter button

@CSFundraising