Crime prevention charity will challenge rate relief decision
17 May 2013
The Public Safety Charitable Trust plans to appeal this week’s High Court ruling that it cannot claim...
Sorry for interrupting, but there is something we need to tell you...
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.
If you wish to restrict or block web browser cookies which are set on your device then you can do this through your browser settings, the Help function within your browser will tell you how.
The Fundraising Standards Board has ruled that the WRVS broke the ‘Fundraising Promise’ by failing to provide a complainant with “clear and definitive” information about the costs of a prize draw fundraising appeal.
The FRSB adjudication, released this morning, found that the WRVS campaign was not in breach of the Institute of Fundraising’s codes of practice on either direct mail or lotteries and raffles, but nevertheless breached the ‘Fundraising Promise’ – the agreement to which FRSB members sign up.
While dismissing a host of other issues raised by the single complainant, the FRSB did find that WRVS had not been clear enough in its explanation of the costs of the campaign. WRVS has since, at the FRSB board’s request, responded to the complainant’s question about the campaign costs more clearly.
The FRSB also had concern that the charity did not refer the complainant to the FRSB as a regulator of fundraising complaints and has recommended that WRVS make clear the FRSB’s role when facing complaints in the future.
The WRVS said it was disappointed with the ruling, but that it was always working to improve its processes.
WRVS chief executive David McCullough said that the FRSB adjudication followed “a long process during which the charity repeatedly attempted to resolve the matter with the complainant through written communication and with offers to meet in person”.
He said: “The charity prides itself on its high standards of fundraising and in being open and honest and has since undertaken a thorough review of its complaints procedure to ensure full compliancy with FRSB guidelines. In addition, a FAQ for members of the public providing clarification on the prize draw appeal has been developed and is available on request as well as on our website.”
The FRSB has also now written to the Institute of Fundraising recommending an addition to its codes of practice on raffles and lotteries. The Institute, which is presently rolling all its codes of fundraising into one document, should make it a requirement of the raffles code that charities comply with the British Code of Advertising, Sales, Promotion and Direct Marketing.
17 May 2013
The Public Safety Charitable Trust plans to appeal this week’s High Court ruling that it cannot claim...
17 May 2013
The Cabinet Office’s Centre for Social Impact Bonds has developed two new tools to assist the development...
17 May 2013
The Financial Reporting Council, which oversees financial reporting in the UK and Ireland, yesterday agreed...
16 May 2013
While management in the charity sector has changed significantly in the past few decades, a reluctance...
15 May 2013
The union Unite and Intern Aware have called on charities to stop unpaid internships, saying it...
15 May 2013
As Roald Dahl's Marvellous Children's Charity seeks to expand its remit to provide support to any child...
17 May 2013
The voluntary sector should create a “data manifesto” that identifies who holds data about the sector...
16 May 2013
While management in the charity sector has changed significantly in the past few decades, a reluctance...
13 May 2013
Your CivilSociety rounds-up the most read stories from the previous week.
Corporate Partnerships Survey 2012
from £35.00
BUY NOW
2012 Charity Shops Survey
from £75.00
BUY NOW
Fundraising (with optional website)
from £89.00
BUY NOW