Share

WRVS falls foul of ‘Fundraising Promise’ in costs complaint

WRVS falls foul of ‘Fundraising Promise’ in costs complaint
News

WRVS falls foul of ‘Fundraising Promise’ in costs complaint

Fundraising | Celina Ribeiro | 3 Oct 2012

The Fundraising Standards Board has ruled that the WRVS broke the ‘Fundraising Promise’ by failing to provide a complainant with “clear and definitive” information about the costs of a prize draw fundraising appeal.

The FRSB adjudication, released this morning, found that the WRVS campaign was not in breach of the Institute of Fundraising’s codes of practice on either direct mail or lotteries and raffles, but nevertheless breached the ‘Fundraising Promise’ – the agreement to which FRSB members sign up.  

While dismissing a host of other issues raised by the single complainant, the FRSB did find that WRVS had not been clear enough in its explanation of the costs of the campaign. WRVS has since, at the FRSB board’s request, responded to the complainant’s question about the campaign costs more clearly.

The FRSB also had concern that the charity did not refer the complainant to the FRSB as a regulator of fundraising complaints and has recommended that WRVS make clear the FRSB’s role when facing complaints in the future.

The WRVS said it was disappointed with the ruling, but that it was always working to improve its processes.

WRVS chief executive David McCullough said that the FRSB adjudication followed “a long process during which the charity repeatedly attempted to resolve the matter with the complainant through written communication and with offers to meet in person”.

He said: “The charity prides itself on its high standards of fundraising and in being open and honest and has since undertaken a thorough review of its complaints procedure to ensure full compliancy with FRSB guidelines.  In addition, a FAQ for members of the public providing clarification on the prize draw appeal has been developed and is available on request as well as on our website.”

FRSB recommends addition to Institute codes


The FRSB has also now written to the Institute of Fundraising recommending an addition to its codes of practice on raffles and lotteries. The Institute, which is presently rolling all its codes of fundraising into one document, should make it a requirement of the raffles code that charities comply with the British Code of Advertising, Sales, Promotion and Direct Marketing. 

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Free eNews

Crime prevention charity will challenge rate relief decision

17 May 2013

The Public Safety Charitable Trust plans to appeal this week’s High Court ruling that it cannot claim...

Centre for Social Impact Bonds launches new tools

17 May 2013

The Cabinet Office’s Centre for Social Impact Bonds has developed two new tools to assist the development...

New Sorp cleared for sector consultation

17 May 2013

The Financial Reporting Council, which oversees financial reporting in the UK and Ireland, yesterday agreed...

Charity governance is stuck in the past, finds leadership review

16 May 2013

While management in the charity sector has changed significantly in the past few decades, a reluctance...

Charities urged to end unpaid internships

15 May 2013

The union Unite and Intern Aware have called on charities to stop unpaid internships, saying it...

Roald Dahl charity seeks sector's views on new strategy

15 May 2013

As Roald Dahl's Marvellous Children's Charity seeks to expand its remit to provide support to any child...

Sector needs a 'data manifesto', says leadership review

17 May 2013

The voluntary sector should create a “data manifesto” that identifies who holds data about the sector...

Charity governance is stuck in the past, finds leadership review

16 May 2013

While management in the charity sector has changed significantly in the past few decades, a reluctance...

Your picks of the week

13 May 2013

Your CivilSociety rounds-up the most read stories from the previous week.

Join the discussion

Twitter button

@CSFundraising