Share

Saxton challenges validity of CAF research conclusions

Joe Saxton, driver of ideas, nfpSynergy
News

Saxton challenges validity of CAF research conclusions2

Fundraising | Tania Mason | 25 Sep 2012

Joe Saxton, driver of ideas at research consultancy nfpSynergy, has cast doubt on some of the conclusions drawn by Charities Aid Foundation in its report last week on the growing generation gap in giving.

Saxton has also accused CAF of tacking its longstanding policy campaigns onto the back of the report, when they don’t all have relevance to the subject.

He told civilsociety.co.uk that he plans to write an open letter to CAF chief executive John Low challenging the validity of the analysis.

CAF’s report, published on Friday, suggested that people in their 20s and 30s today are much less likely to give to charity than those of the same age a generation ago, and that people over 60 are increasingly shouldering the burden of supplying voluntary donations to the sector.

It warned that the findings foretell of a looming “crisis in giving” and implored the sector and the government to work together on ways of tackling the problem.  Its five key suggestions were: introducing children to charities at school; encouraging young people to become trustees; restructuring payroll giving; introducing lifetime legacies; and creating an online gift aid declaration.

The report received widespread media coverage, including on Friday’s Today programme on Radio 4.

But Saxton says the angle promoted by CAF doesn’t always match the findings.

He highlighted a chart in the report that shows that giving as a percentage of total spending, by age group, had not changed for the under-30s from 1980 to 2010.  But because the figure for the over-75s had increased from 0.57 per cent in 1980 to 1.54 per cent in 2010, CAF had characterised this as younger people being less generous because older people were giving more.

Prompts 'unfamiliar to younger donors'

Saxton also claimed that the examples of charitable giving that were used to prompt people’s recollection of whether they gave or not, would have triggered responses much more readily from older people than younger ones.  These included phrases such as “blind box”, “cancer league”, “Gold Heart (charity)”, “missionary box”, "mothers’ union collection", “candles (church)” and “sponsor money”.

“There was no Children in Need, Comic Relief, JustGiving, or text message donation,” Saxton said. “It’s a list that is guaranteed to resonate more with an older audience than a younger one.”

He also said that the research is based on giving by households, rather than individuals, yet it doesn’t appear to take into account the steady increase in single-person households over the last three decades. 

“If you knocked on doors in 1980, the chances of there being someone in the household that gave to charity would have been more likely simply because there were more people in the house then.”

CAF’s policy solutions ‘just its usual agenda’

And he criticised most of CAF’s ideas for tackling the problem as unfocused.  Introducing an online gift aid declaration would do nothing to prompt people to give more, it would simply increase the amount the government gives in tax relief.  Introducing lifetime legacies would unlock more giving from older people, not younger ones.  Encouraging young trustees would not boost donations. And when calling for reforms to embed a stronger culture of workplace giving, CAF should have been transparent about its ownership of the UK’s biggest payroll giving scheme Give As You Earn.

“They’re peddling an agenda that isn’t based on the research and the agenda looks suspiciously like the same agenda they've always had,” said Saxton.

CAF: Younger people are contributing a lesser share

But CAF insisted that the results clearly show that the gap between the donations made by the over-60s and the under-30s has widened during the last 30 years.

Hannah Terry, head of policy and campaigns, said: “If you look at total giving coming from different age groups in each year from 1978 to 2010, all of the age groups under 60 contributed a smaller share of total donations in 2010 compared to 1978, while the opposite is true among the over-60s.

“The share coming from the under-30s fell from 8 per cent in 1980 to 3 per cent in 2010, while the share coming from the over-75s grew from 9 per cent in 1980 to 21 per cent in 2010.”

Terrey added that CAF is dedicated to promoting giving and supporting civil society, and felt it was important that the research be shared so the issues could be debated. 

CAF: ‘No silver bullet’

“We have put forward five key measures we think could help to reverse the tide but there is no silver bullet. We are delighted if people debate the findings and table their own proposals for reform if they think they could make a difference.

“If people start to think more about how we can engage younger generations with giving, and the work of charities, then the sector will have been usefully assisted.”

 

Peter Maple
Director Charity Fundraising Courses
London South Bank University
27 Sep 2012

Joe is bang on here. The baby boomer cohort is huge and therefore strongly weights any giving analysis. It's not that generation X and Y is giving less but simply that there are far more baby boomers!

The gap between older and younger givers has always been there but there is little evidence to suggest, in real terms, that it is widening. That said there is some interesting stuff in the report that fundraisers would do well to note and think about.

DAME HILARY BLUME
Director
Charities Advisory Trust
25 Sep 2012

still unclear as to whether CAF report is measuring amounts given, no. of donations or no. of people giving.
Have asked for clarification.
Ways younger people give (eg. text) inclines to smaller amounts.
If there is any more fund-raising done in schools there won't be time for reading and writing, never mind sports!

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Free eNews

Finsbury Park Mosque told its bank account will be closed by HSBC

30 Jul 2014

It has emerged that other Muslim organisations, including the Finsbury Park Mosque, as well as individuals...

Syria and Haiyan appeals boost Oxfam income by 6 per cent

30 Jul 2014

Oxfam’s total income rose by more than £21m to £389m in the year to March 2014, according to its annual...

Man admits stealing £300,000 from collections for Help for Heroes

29 Jul 2014

A man has admitted pocketing £300,000 donated by members of the public who believed it would go to Help...

Commission investigates charity over concerns it was used for private benefit

29 Jul 2014

The Charity Commission has opened a statutory inquiry into grant-giver the Catalyst Trust over concerns...

PTA-UK: Big Society Network chief was confident of funding

28 Jul 2014

PTA-UK has revealed that it turned down an invitation from Big Society Network to be a partner in its...

Big Society Network chair’s company gave £64k to Conservative Party

28 Jul 2014

A company owned by the chair of Big Society Network donated services totalling more than £54,000 to the...

Online donations forms are too long and cost charities donations, finds report

28 Jul 2014

One third of leading charity websites require potential donors to complete more than 20 actions before...

Greenpeace video removed from YouTube following copyright claim

14 Jul 2014

A campaign video by Greenpeace against Lego’s relationship with Shell has been subject to a copyright...

Oxfam advert removed after appearing before extremist videos

10 Jul 2014

Oxfam has removed one of its adverts from YouTube after it was shown on channels showing content from...

Join the discussion

Twitter button

@CSFundraising