Share

Camelot will not appeal Health Lottery judgment, urging political action instead

Camelot
News

Camelot will not appeal Health Lottery judgment, urging political action instead1

Fundraising | Tania Mason | 24 Sep 2012

Camelot has decided not to appeal against last month’s High Court judgment refusing permission for a judicial review of the Gambling Commission’s regulation of the Health Lottery.

Instead, it has called on Prime Minister David Cameron to take action against the Health Lottery's activities.

The National Lottery operator says it recognises that proceeding with the appeal would only delay the political action needed to close the “loophole” in the Gambling Act which it claims has allowed the Health Lottery to operate as a national brand and so position itself as a direct rival to the National Lottery.

The Health Lottery denies that it operates nationally.

Camelot Group CEO Dianne Thompson has today written to the Prime Minister telling him that the company will withdraw its application for leave to appeal, even though its lawyers have advised it has “clear grounds” for appeal.

She said the Health Lottery’s recent announcement that it is to launch a mid-week draw next month only serves to “underline the urgency with which the government needs to act to ensure that the law mirrors the intention and will of Parliament that there should be only one National Lottery”.

Thompson: Incentive for more 'industrial-scale society lotteries'

She said: “As we have warned all along, time is of the essence – the longer the period of political inaction, the more incentive there is for other commercial operators to establish similar industrial-scale society lotteries that would effectively cannibalise National Lottery sales and returns to good causes.

“Now there is no longer any legal impediment to political action, we are urging the government to take swift action to protect the National Lottery and the significant contribution it makes to society.”

Camelot said that both the High Court judgment and the Gambling Commission’s own evidence agreed that political action was needed if the Health Lottery was to be stopped from operating in its current format.  The judgment stated: “The question whether multiple society lotteries should be permitted is a political question, to be determined by the government or Parliament."

Health Lottery: Camelot knows it would lose

But the Health Lottery suggested that Camelot knew an appeal would not succeed.  A spokeswoman said: “The High Court was quite clear when it rejected Camelot’s call for judicial review of the Health Lottery that it believed Camelot’s case had no reasonable chance of success and that the Health Lottery was an entirely lawful structure.
 
"By now calling on the Prime Minister to close down the Health Lottery in this way, having lost the legal arguments, Camelot is seeking to shut off a vital pipeline of funding that has helped health-related charities in every part of Great Britain at a time when charities and local projects are struggling more than ever to raise funds."

The Health Lottery has so far raised over £24m for health charities.

The spokeswoman added: "Camelot enjoyed record sales of £6.5bn last year and is enjoying continued growth. Our sales are less than 2 per cent of theirs and we are surprised that Camelot continues its attempts to close down a far smaller lottery operator, which in any case has an entirely different and regionally-focused structure.”


 

Muriel Simmons
Chairman
AlllergyUK
24 Sep 2012

The public will clearly demonstrate whether they want the Health Lottery to suceed. It could be that the public feel increasingly remote from the decision making process of the National Lottery and where it spends its money.
Cut backs in the health service affect everyone and I suspect that Camelot recognise that the public will vote with their money when they enter the store to buy their lottery ticket. Maybe the answer is for the National Lottery to guarantee a good percentage of their income will be donated to health causes.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Access Foundation to invest endowment in social investment

24 Aug 2016

Access: the Foundation for Social Investment has announced it will put its endowment from the Cabinet...

Charity investigated after it did not know its own income

23 Aug 2016

The Charity Commission has opened an inquiry into a charity that underestimated its own annual income...

Charities ask Treasury for clarity on EU funding for the sector

22 Aug 2016

Charity representative bodies have written to the Treasury seeking assurances about European Union funding....

Association of Charitable Foundations' chief executive will step down this year

25 Aug 2016

David Emerson is stepping down as chief executive of the Association of Charitable Foundations later this...

Charity Commission should ‘avoid the temptation to look tough’ when it starts disqualifying trustees

24 Aug 2016

Other infrastructure bodies have joined NCVO in raising concerns about how the Charity Commission might...

New Commission powers ‘threaten the independence of charities’, NCVO warns

23 Aug 2016

Some of the Charity Commission’s new powers “threaten the independence of charities”, NCVO has said...

Free HR system to launch for charities

25 Aug 2016

A free human resources system designed for charities will launch next month and is currently being trialled...

RSPCA ranked fourth in global charity social media brand index

19 Aug 2016

A new social media index has said that the RSPCA has the fourth best digital charity brand globally, with...

Charity Commission retracts story which indicated it would no longer publish all accounts

18 Aug 2016

The Charity Commission has published a news story announcing it will no longer display documents received...

Join the discussion

Twitter button

@CSFundraising