Share

Camelot loses High Court challenge to Health Lottery, but will appeal

Camelot loses High Court challenge to Health Lottery, but will appeal
News

Camelot loses High Court challenge to Health Lottery, but will appeal 3

Fundraising | Celina Ribeiro | 22 Aug 2012

The High Court has dismissed a claim by the National Lottery operator against the Gambling Commission, finding this morning that the Commission was correct in licensing the Health Lottery.

The Health Lottery has declared the decision a “victory” for the society lotteries it raises funds for and a “triumph for the society lottery sector as a whole”, but Camelot has already announced its intention to lodge papers with the Court of Appeal.

Lord Justice Stanley Burnton and Justice Kenneth Parker agreed that the Camelot claim against the Gambling Commission’s decision was out of time and that, in any case, its case had no “real prospect of success”.

Camelot had taken the Gambling Commission to court over its licensing of the Health Lottery, which started selling tickets in October last year. The National Lottery operator argued that the Health Lottery in effect acted as a national lottery, of which legislation dictates there is only supposed to be one in the UK. But the Gambling Commission countered that the Health Lottery structure, which involves nationwide tickets sales but is the result of 51 linked society lotteries, is permitted by law, and that any confusion over such linked lotteries should be cleared up by the government, not the courts.

In handing down his decision, Lord Justice Burnton said: “I agree with the Commission that the question whether multiple society lotteries should be permitted is a political question, to be determined by the government or parliament. Multiple society lotteries are not prohibited by the [Gambling] Act [2005].”

Following the release of the judgement this morning, Camelot released a statement in which it said it was disappointed with what it called “a legally-flawed and unfair decision by the court”.

Camelot calls for lottery 'loophole' closure

Dianne Thompson, Camelot chief executive, said government must now act “immediately” to clarify the law so as to prevent other, similar multi-society lotteries being set up and “effectively cannibalise National Lottery sales and return to good causes”. Earlier this year Camelot claimed that the National Lottery was losing £1m a week due to the Health Lottery, but a report released during the course of the High Court action suggested that the Health Lottery was taking at most £300,000 from the National Lottery’s weekly sales.

“It is now imperative that the government acts to close this loophole and to ensure that the law mirrors the intention and will of parliament that there should be only one National Lottery,” she said.

Health Lottery: ‘Complete vindication’


The Health Lottery, however, says that the decision has been a boon for the society lottery sector, which it says raised £168m last year for good causes. The Health Lottery has raised around £23m, and announced at launch aspirations to return £50m a year to health causes. The Health Lottery has been under fire from Camelot, and some commentators in the sector, since launching last October.

Richard Desmond, chairman of Northern and Shell which owns the Health Lottery said: “The High Court’s judgement today is a complete vindication of all the hard work that has gone into launching the Health Lottery.

“If Camelot had succeeded in this case they would have shut down lifeline funding to hundreds of health projects and charities, and the charity sector would have lost out badly. I am thrilled that the Court has seen through their tactics and we can get back to work.”

'Limited impact' on society lottery sector


The Lotteries Council chairman Clive Mollett said that it is unlikely that the ruling will unleash a flood of copycat multi-society lotteries.

“The fact of the matter is the Health Lottery has been lawfully established, it is operating in a legal manner, but quite clearly the proceeds that have been derived so far are far short of expectations, so I don’t think its likely to have any impact on what’s happening in the society lottery arena - other than the fact that obviously it’s created a great deal of negative feedback from Camelot which is trying to defend their position,” he told civilsociety.co.uk.

Camelot has no interest whatever in society lotteries, and it has always been quite hostile to what we’re trying to do from a fundraising perspective.” 

ASA ruling

The Health Lottery was subject to another adjudication today, with the Advertising Standards Authority ruling that its television advert which featured the text that players could win 'up to £1/4m' fell foul of advertising rules. Two individuals complained that this was not the typical jackpot. 

The Health Lottery had argued that it was possible to win £250,000 and that this had been paid out once, two months prior to the ad airing. It said that the advertisement was for the lottery generally and not a particular draw. The ASA, however,  judged that the ad was misleading and told the Health Lottery not to run ads implying larger than usual jackpots could be won. 

Gordon Hunter
23 Aug 2012

So, they're not willing to answer the question?

Celina Ribeiro
Editor
Fundraising magazine, Civil Society
22 Aug 2012

Gordon,

Camelot tells me the funding of the court case have come out of the company's own profits, and has not impacted on its payouts to the National Lottery good causes.

Gordon Hunter
Director
Lincolnshire Community Foundation
22 Aug 2012

Could we be told how much the case has cost BIG so far and how much they are willing to spend on an appeal?

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Tags

Free eNews

Your picks of the week

20 May 2013

Your CivilSociety rounds-up the most read stories from the previous week.

Crime prevention charity will challenge rate relief decision

17 May 2013

The Public Safety Charitable Trust plans to appeal this week’s High Court ruling that it cannot claim...

Charities told using 'social enterprise' brand will help them win funding

17 May 2013

St Andrew’s Healthcare, one of the largest charities in the UK, has been told by commissioners that...

DWP told to publish names of organisations involved in workfare

20 May 2013

The Information Tribunal has ruled that the Department for Work and Pensions must publish the names of...

Civil society merger of the year

20 May 2013

An impressive array of sector leaders turned out in all their finery on Saturday to attend the wedding...

Comic Relief appoints BBC Worldwide chief as new chairman

20 May 2013

Peter Bennett-Jones has decided to step down as chairman of Comic Relief after 15 years at the helm.

Your picks of the week

20 May 2013

Your CivilSociety rounds-up the most read stories from the previous week.

Sector needs a 'data manifesto', says leadership review

17 May 2013

The voluntary sector should create a “data manifesto” that identifies who holds data about the sector...

Charity governance is stuck in the past, finds leadership review

16 May 2013

While management in the charity sector has changed significantly in the past few decades, a reluctance...

Join the discussion

Twitter button

@CSFundraising