Share

Fraud worries override concerns about small charity access to small donations scheme

Fraud worries override concerns about small charity access to small donations scheme
News

Fraud worries override concerns about small charity access to small donations scheme 2

Fundraising | Celina Ribeiro | 16 Aug 2012

Widespread concerns that linking a charity’s gift aid record to its ability to claim grants from the Gift Aid Small Donations Scheme will disadvantage small charities were overruled by government, which has argued that the measures are necessary to combat fraud.

The Small Charitable Donations Bill, which will enable charities to claim gift aid-style grants (rather than tax relief) on small donations of up to £5,000, was heralded at its inception as enabling small charities to leverage their donations as large charities do.

The report on the consultation about the Bill, which was introduced in June, however, found that many charities shared the concerns voiced by sector leaders about the scheme and fear the bureaucracy involved could deter small charities from utilising the scheme.  

The research paper on the Bill, released by the government this week, revealed that two aspects of the proposed scheme caused charities particular consternation: that the amount a charity can claim from the Gift Aid Small Donations Scheme cannot exceed double the amount they claim in gift aid; and that only charities and community amateur sports clubs which have successfully made gift aid claims in three of the previous seven years are eligible for the scheme.

The department’s own summary of responses to the Bill said that a majority felt that the requirement that charities have their small donations claim matched to their gift aid claims is “an unfair concept and a barrier”. Respondents to the consultation argued it might “disadvantage small charities without regular income on which gift aid is claimed, poorer charities in poorer areas, charities that rely heavily on street collections and those, such as mental health charities, where a lot of donors are not taxpayers”.

“Most respondents” also opposed the test for eligibility being based on previous gift aid claims, again arguing that this would deter small charities from using the scheme, the report revealed.

However, both of these elements have made it into the bill. The government has responded that both elements are required to prevent against the possibility of fraud.

The number of charities claiming small amounts of gift aid relief (less than £1,000) has fallen over recent years, still hovering lower than 2005/06 levels. In contrast the number of charities which claim gift aid repayments valued at more than £1m has steadily increased, and in 2011/2012 nearly a third more charities are claiming gift aid at these levels than in 2005/2006. 

The Scheme is due to take effect in April next year. 

Tania Cohen
Freelance Consultant
Various Charities
16 Aug 2012

There is still time to have your say on the Bill by making your comments directly to the Government on the Public Reading Stage website before 23rd August. For more information on how you can get involved, see http://www.institute-of-fundraising.org.uk/policy-and-campaigns/campaigns/small-charitable-donation-bill/

The 3 year eligibility is clause 2(1) and the matching condition is 1(4). The Public Reading Stage website looks complicated but is actually easy to add your comments to. Have your say!

Mike Wade
Director of Fundraising and Communications
NDCS
16 Aug 2012

There is a wider issue going on here. As someone who was heavily involved in the development of the existing Gift Aid scheme back in 1999, there was a real desire from Goverment back then to develop something that would work. At times this meant ministers standing up to internal lobbyists who wanted to sacrifice ease of use in favour of more and more "safeguards". Overall, I think we struck a good balance.

More recently, we are seeing a recurring theme of clamping down, making Gift Aid less and less user friendly. Whether it is lengthy footnotes about "all charities I give to"; footnotes about Council Tax; or excluding the very charities who have most to gain from the small donations scheme which was meant to have been designed with them in mind - all the indicators point to a worrying and fundamental shift in approach.

I suspect the Government will hide behind "needing to safeguard the donor", given that the donor is theoretically liable for any misclaimed tax. Fine - let's change that one (as the charity sector pretty much universally argued back in 1999) and make the charities liable for any misclaimed tax. It's only money they shouldn't have had in the first place anyway.

Any thoughts?

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Free eNews

Specialist Work Programme providers should get more funding for new services, say MPs

21 May 2013

The Department for Work and Pensions should use some of the money it has saved on outcome payments in...

Commission reissues business rate relief warning

21 May 2013

The Charity Commission has reissued an alert for charities about the risks of entering tenancy agreements...

Government to provide support to charities bidding for rehabilitation contracts

21 May 2013

The Cabinet Office and the Ministry of Justice plan to develop a tool which will help charities and social...

16 philanthropists join CRUK £100m fundraising board

21 May 2013

Cancer Research UK has signed up 16 high-flying philanthropists to the development board to lead its £100m...

DWP told to publish names of organisations involved in workfare

20 May 2013

The Information Tribunal has ruled that the Department for Work and Pensions must publish the names of...

Civil society merger of the year

20 May 2013

An impressive array of sector leaders turned out in all their finery on Saturday to attend the wedding...

Your picks of the week

20 May 2013

Your CivilSociety rounds-up the most read stories from the previous week.

Sector needs a 'data manifesto', says leadership review

17 May 2013

The voluntary sector should create a “data manifesto” that identifies who holds data about the sector...

Charity governance is stuck in the past, finds leadership review

16 May 2013

While management in the charity sector has changed significantly in the past few decades, a reluctance...

Join the discussion

Twitter button

@CSFundraising